激进经验主义:威廉·詹姆斯和吉勒·德勒兹

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
J. Stuhr
{"title":"激进经验主义:威廉·詹姆斯和吉勒·德勒兹","authors":"J. Stuhr","doi":"10.1163/18758185-bja10026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBoth William James and Gilles Deleuze labeled their philosophies \"radical empiricism.\" In this context, this essay explores the similarities and differences between James's radical empiricism (particularly as it is present early inches Principles of Psychology) and Deleuze's \"transcendental empiricism\" (particularly as set forth in The Logic of Sense). These accounts then inform a view of philosophy understood as a creative art. This art demands flexible habits--what James termed \"genius\"--in a changing world. Accordingly, radically empirical accounts of creativity and genius are sketched.","PeriodicalId":42794,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Pragmatism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radical Empiricism: William James and Gilles Deleuze\",\"authors\":\"J. Stuhr\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18758185-bja10026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nBoth William James and Gilles Deleuze labeled their philosophies \\\"radical empiricism.\\\" In this context, this essay explores the similarities and differences between James's radical empiricism (particularly as it is present early inches Principles of Psychology) and Deleuze's \\\"transcendental empiricism\\\" (particularly as set forth in The Logic of Sense). These accounts then inform a view of philosophy understood as a creative art. This art demands flexible habits--what James termed \\\"genius\\\"--in a changing world. Accordingly, radically empirical accounts of creativity and genius are sketched.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Pragmatism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Pragmatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-bja10026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Pragmatism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-bja10026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

威廉·詹姆斯和吉尔·德勒兹都把他们的哲学称为“激进的经验主义”。在这种背景下,本文探讨了詹姆斯的激进经验主义(特别是在早期的《心理学原理》中)和德勒兹的“先验经验主义”(特别是在《感觉的逻辑》中所阐述的)之间的异同。这些描述告诉我们,哲学被理解为一种创造性的艺术。这门艺术需要灵活的习惯——詹姆斯称之为“天才”——在不断变化的世界中。因此,创造性和天才的根本经验的叙述是素描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radical Empiricism: William James and Gilles Deleuze
Both William James and Gilles Deleuze labeled their philosophies "radical empiricism." In this context, this essay explores the similarities and differences between James's radical empiricism (particularly as it is present early inches Principles of Psychology) and Deleuze's "transcendental empiricism" (particularly as set forth in The Logic of Sense). These accounts then inform a view of philosophy understood as a creative art. This art demands flexible habits--what James termed "genius"--in a changing world. Accordingly, radically empirical accounts of creativity and genius are sketched.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信