双胞胎和朋友的现实监测和元记忆

E. Krackow, Brianna N. DeLarge, Victoria DiSciullo, E. Deming, Madison G. Gallimore
{"title":"双胞胎和朋友的现实监测和元记忆","authors":"E. Krackow, Brianna N. DeLarge, Victoria DiSciullo, E. Deming, Madison G. Gallimore","doi":"10.1177/02762366221131244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study examined source memory/reality monitoring ability and metamemory accuracy in same-sex twins (n = 60) versus friends (n = 49). Dyads were provided a series of actions and imaginings followed by a reality monitoring and metamemory test that included both reality monitoring questions and appraisals of the likelihood of having made a memory error. There were no significant differences between twins and friends on the number of correct performed action items recalled, but twins were more likely than were friends to confuse whether they or their co-twin was the subject of the imaginings. Friends were more apt than twins to accurately appraise the likelihood of having made a memory error. Implications for twins as eyewitnesses are discussed.","PeriodicalId":89150,"journal":{"name":"Imagination, cognition and personality","volume":"42 1","pages":"399 - 414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reality Monitoring and Metamemory in Twins and Friends\",\"authors\":\"E. Krackow, Brianna N. DeLarge, Victoria DiSciullo, E. Deming, Madison G. Gallimore\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02762366221131244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study examined source memory/reality monitoring ability and metamemory accuracy in same-sex twins (n = 60) versus friends (n = 49). Dyads were provided a series of actions and imaginings followed by a reality monitoring and metamemory test that included both reality monitoring questions and appraisals of the likelihood of having made a memory error. There were no significant differences between twins and friends on the number of correct performed action items recalled, but twins were more likely than were friends to confuse whether they or their co-twin was the subject of the imaginings. Friends were more apt than twins to accurately appraise the likelihood of having made a memory error. Implications for twins as eyewitnesses are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imagination, cognition and personality\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"399 - 414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imagination, cognition and personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366221131244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imagination, cognition and personality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366221131244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究考察了同性双胞胎(n = 60)和朋友(n = 49)的源记忆/现实监测能力和元记忆准确性。二人组被要求进行一系列的动作和想象,然后进行现实监测和元记忆测试,其中包括现实监测问题和对犯记忆错误可能性的评估。双胞胎和朋友之间在正确回忆的动作项目数量上没有显著差异,但双胞胎比朋友更容易混淆他们或他们的孪生兄弟是想象的对象。朋友比双胞胎更容易准确地判断出记忆错误的可能性。对双胞胎作为目击证人的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reality Monitoring and Metamemory in Twins and Friends
The current study examined source memory/reality monitoring ability and metamemory accuracy in same-sex twins (n = 60) versus friends (n = 49). Dyads were provided a series of actions and imaginings followed by a reality monitoring and metamemory test that included both reality monitoring questions and appraisals of the likelihood of having made a memory error. There were no significant differences between twins and friends on the number of correct performed action items recalled, but twins were more likely than were friends to confuse whether they or their co-twin was the subject of the imaginings. Friends were more apt than twins to accurately appraise the likelihood of having made a memory error. Implications for twins as eyewitnesses are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信