劳动力份额与收入不平等:1990-2015年期间的一些经验证据

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
I. Erauskin
{"title":"劳动力份额与收入不平等:1990-2015年期间的一些经验证据","authors":"I. Erauskin","doi":"10.1108/aea-04-2020-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to analyze empirically the relationship between the labor share and income inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient and by the income shares for different quintiles, during the period 1990–2015 for 62 developed and developing countries.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses panel data techniques to analyze empirically the relationship between the labor share and income inequality.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper finds that a lower labor share is associated with a higher Gini coefficient. A lower labor share is found to be strongly associated with a smaller income share for the lowest two quintiles and larger income share for the highest quintile and weakly associated with a smaller income share for the third and fourth quintiles. Moreover, this paper finds that the lower the quintile, the stronger the impact of the labor share on the income share of the quintile.\n\n\nSocial implications\nPolicymakers should take into account the evolution of the labor share. Public policies that improve labor market outcomes, such as those aimed to promote participation in the labor market and strengthen the human capital of low-income groups, seem necessary to prevent the rise in economic inequalities. Moreover, as the digital transformation of society progresses, policies to promote skill deepening may have an important role in reversing excessive inequalities.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nHow changes in the labor share are associated with changes in the Gini coefficient, and how this is driven by income shares for different quintiles, for a broad range of countries during the most recent period, has not been comprehensively studied using panel data techniques.\n","PeriodicalId":36191,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/aea-04-2020-0028","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The labor share and income inequality: some empirical evidence for the period 1990-2015\",\"authors\":\"I. Erauskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/aea-04-2020-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to analyze empirically the relationship between the labor share and income inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient and by the income shares for different quintiles, during the period 1990–2015 for 62 developed and developing countries.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study uses panel data techniques to analyze empirically the relationship between the labor share and income inequality.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis paper finds that a lower labor share is associated with a higher Gini coefficient. A lower labor share is found to be strongly associated with a smaller income share for the lowest two quintiles and larger income share for the highest quintile and weakly associated with a smaller income share for the third and fourth quintiles. Moreover, this paper finds that the lower the quintile, the stronger the impact of the labor share on the income share of the quintile.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nPolicymakers should take into account the evolution of the labor share. Public policies that improve labor market outcomes, such as those aimed to promote participation in the labor market and strengthen the human capital of low-income groups, seem necessary to prevent the rise in economic inequalities. Moreover, as the digital transformation of society progresses, policies to promote skill deepening may have an important role in reversing excessive inequalities.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nHow changes in the labor share are associated with changes in the Gini coefficient, and how this is driven by income shares for different quintiles, for a broad range of countries during the most recent period, has not been comprehensively studied using panel data techniques.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Economic Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/aea-04-2020-0028\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Economic Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/aea-04-2020-0028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aea-04-2020-0028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的本文的目的是实证分析1990-2015年期间62个发达国家和发展中国家的劳动份额与收入不平等之间的关系,用基尼系数和不同五分位数的收入份额来衡量。设计/方法论/方法本研究使用面板数据技术实证分析劳动力份额与收入不平等之间的关系。研究发现,劳动力份额越低,基尼系数越高。劳动力份额越低,最低的两个五分位数的收入份额越小,最高的五分位数收入份额越大,第三和第四个五分之一的收入份额就越小。此外,本文发现,五分位数越低,劳动份额对五分位数收入份额的影响越大。社会影响政策制定者应该考虑劳动力份额的演变。改善劳动力市场结果的公共政策,例如旨在促进劳动力市场参与和加强低收入群体人力资本的政策,似乎对防止经济不平等加剧是必要的。此外,随着社会数字化转型的推进,促进技能深化的政策可能在扭转过度不平等方面发挥重要作用。独创性/价值在最近一段时间内,对于广泛的国家来说,劳动力份额的变化如何与基尼系数的变化相关联,以及这是如何由不同五分位数的收入份额驱动的,尚未使用面板数据技术进行全面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The labor share and income inequality: some empirical evidence for the period 1990-2015
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze empirically the relationship between the labor share and income inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient and by the income shares for different quintiles, during the period 1990–2015 for 62 developed and developing countries. Design/methodology/approach This study uses panel data techniques to analyze empirically the relationship between the labor share and income inequality. Findings This paper finds that a lower labor share is associated with a higher Gini coefficient. A lower labor share is found to be strongly associated with a smaller income share for the lowest two quintiles and larger income share for the highest quintile and weakly associated with a smaller income share for the third and fourth quintiles. Moreover, this paper finds that the lower the quintile, the stronger the impact of the labor share on the income share of the quintile. Social implications Policymakers should take into account the evolution of the labor share. Public policies that improve labor market outcomes, such as those aimed to promote participation in the labor market and strengthen the human capital of low-income groups, seem necessary to prevent the rise in economic inequalities. Moreover, as the digital transformation of society progresses, policies to promote skill deepening may have an important role in reversing excessive inequalities. Originality/value How changes in the labor share are associated with changes in the Gini coefficient, and how this is driven by income shares for different quintiles, for a broad range of countries during the most recent period, has not been comprehensively studied using panel data techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economic Analysis
Applied Economic Analysis Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信