《现代美德:玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特与异议传统

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY

International Journal of Philosophy and Theology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21692327.2023.2182823

Anne Guillard

{"title":"《现代美德:玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特与异议传统","authors":"Anne Guillard","doi":"10.1080/21692327.2023.2182823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"argues for the relevance of Mary Wollstonecraft’s intellectual legacy for the contemporary debate on ethics. The study is based on the whole of Wollstonecraft’s literary corpus and is characterized by its interdisciplinary openings, highlighting in particular the theological background of the English feminist’s texts. The author succeeds in capturing a reality that has often been missed in commentaries on Wollstonecraft’s protean thought: the theological underpinning of her argument for women’s rights","PeriodicalId":42052,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Philosophy and Theology","volume":"84 1","pages":"92 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Virtue: Mary Wollstonecraft and a Tradition of Dissent\",\"authors\":\"Anne Guillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21692327.2023.2182823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"argues for the relevance of Mary Wollstonecraft’s intellectual legacy for the contemporary debate on ethics. The study is based on the whole of Wollstonecraft’s literary corpus and is characterized by its interdisciplinary openings, highlighting in particular the theological background of the English feminist’s texts. The author succeeds in capturing a reality that has often been missed in commentaries on Wollstonecraft’s protean thought: the theological underpinning of her argument for women’s rights\",\"PeriodicalId\":42052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Philosophy and Theology\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"92 - 95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Philosophy and Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2023.2182823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Philosophy and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2023.2182823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

认为玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特的思想遗产与当代伦理辩论的相关性。本研究以沃斯通克拉夫特的整个文学语料库为基础，具有跨学科的开放性，特别突出了英国女权主义者文本的神学背景。作者成功地捕捉到了一个现实，而这个现实在对沃斯通克拉夫特多变思想的评论中经常被忽略：她主张妇女权利的神学基础

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Modern Virtue: Mary Wollstonecraft and a Tradition of Dissent

argues for the relevance of Mary Wollstonecraft’s intellectual legacy for the contemporary debate on ethics. The study is based on the whole of Wollstonecraft’s literary corpus and is characterized by its interdisciplinary openings, highlighting in particular the theological background of the English feminist’s texts. The author succeeds in capturing a reality that has often been missed in commentaries on Wollstonecraft’s protean thought: the theological underpinning of her argument for women’s rights

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Philosophy and Theology PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Journal of Philosophy and Theology publishes scholarly articles and reviews that concern the intersection between philosophy and theology. It aims to stimulate the creative discussion between various traditions, for example the analytical and the continental traditions. Articles should exhibit high-level scholarship but should be readable for those coming from other philosophical traditions. Fields of interest are: philosophy, especially philosophy of religion, metaphysics, and philosophical ethics, and systematic theology, for example fundamental theology, dogmatic and moral theology. Contributions focusing on the history of these disciplines are also welcome, especially when they are relevant to contemporary discussions.