选择严重哮喘生物疗法的实用指南

IF 2.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Breathe Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1183/20734735.0144-2021
J. Kavanagh, A. Hearn, D. Jackson
{"title":"选择严重哮喘生物疗法的实用指南","authors":"J. Kavanagh, A. Hearn, D. Jackson","doi":"10.1183/20734735.0144-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are now several monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies (“biologics”) available to treat severe asthma. Omalizumab is an anti-IgE mAb and is licensed in severe allergic asthma. Current evidence suggests it may decrease exacerbations by augmenting deficient antiviral immune responses in asthma. Like all other biologics, clinical efficacy is greatest in those with elevated T2 biomarkers. Three biologics target the interleukin (IL)-5–eosinophil pathway, including mepolizumab and reslizumab that target IL-5 itself, and benralizumab that targets the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R-α). These drugs all reduce the exacerbation rate in those with raised blood eosinophil counts. Mepolizumab and benralizumab have also demonstrated steroid-sparing efficacy. Reslizumab is the only biologic that is given intravenously rather than by the subcutaneous route. Dupilumab targets the IL-4 receptor and like mepolizumab and benralizumab is effective at reducing exacerbation rate as well as oral corticosteroid requirements. It is also effective for the treatment of nasal polyposis and atopic dermatitis. Tezepelumab is an anti-TSLP (thymic stromal lymphopoietin) mAb that has recently completed phase 3 trials demonstrating significant reductions in exacerbation rate even at lower T2 biomarker thresholds. Many patients with severe asthma qualify for more than one biologic. To date, there are no head-to-head trials to aid physicians in this choice. However, post-hoc analyses have identified certain clinical characteristics that are associated with superior responses to some therapies. The presence of allergic and/or eosinophilic comorbidities, such as atopic dermatitis, nasal polyposis or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, that may additionally benefit by the choice of biologic should also be taken into consideration, as should patient preferences which may include dosing frequency. To date, all biologics have been shown to have excellent safety profiles. Biologic therapies target T2 inflammatory pathways and elevated FENO and/or blood eosinophil counts are associated with greater clinical efficacy. Choice of drug will depend on individual patient characteristics and preferences. https://bit.ly/3lHOsSQ","PeriodicalId":9292,"journal":{"name":"Breathe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pragmatic guide to choosing biologic therapies in severe asthma\",\"authors\":\"J. Kavanagh, A. Hearn, D. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/20734735.0144-2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are now several monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies (“biologics”) available to treat severe asthma. Omalizumab is an anti-IgE mAb and is licensed in severe allergic asthma. Current evidence suggests it may decrease exacerbations by augmenting deficient antiviral immune responses in asthma. Like all other biologics, clinical efficacy is greatest in those with elevated T2 biomarkers. Three biologics target the interleukin (IL)-5–eosinophil pathway, including mepolizumab and reslizumab that target IL-5 itself, and benralizumab that targets the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R-α). These drugs all reduce the exacerbation rate in those with raised blood eosinophil counts. Mepolizumab and benralizumab have also demonstrated steroid-sparing efficacy. Reslizumab is the only biologic that is given intravenously rather than by the subcutaneous route. Dupilumab targets the IL-4 receptor and like mepolizumab and benralizumab is effective at reducing exacerbation rate as well as oral corticosteroid requirements. It is also effective for the treatment of nasal polyposis and atopic dermatitis. Tezepelumab is an anti-TSLP (thymic stromal lymphopoietin) mAb that has recently completed phase 3 trials demonstrating significant reductions in exacerbation rate even at lower T2 biomarker thresholds. Many patients with severe asthma qualify for more than one biologic. To date, there are no head-to-head trials to aid physicians in this choice. However, post-hoc analyses have identified certain clinical characteristics that are associated with superior responses to some therapies. The presence of allergic and/or eosinophilic comorbidities, such as atopic dermatitis, nasal polyposis or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, that may additionally benefit by the choice of biologic should also be taken into consideration, as should patient preferences which may include dosing frequency. To date, all biologics have been shown to have excellent safety profiles. Biologic therapies target T2 inflammatory pathways and elevated FENO and/or blood eosinophil counts are associated with greater clinical efficacy. Choice of drug will depend on individual patient characteristics and preferences. https://bit.ly/3lHOsSQ\",\"PeriodicalId\":9292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breathe\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breathe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0144-2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breathe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0144-2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

现在有几种单克隆抗体(mAb)疗法(“生物制剂”)可用于治疗严重哮喘。Omalizumab是一种抗ige单抗,被批准用于治疗严重过敏性哮喘。目前的证据表明,它可能通过增强哮喘中缺乏的抗病毒免疫反应来减少病情恶化。与所有其他生物制剂一样,T2生物标志物升高的患者的临床疗效最大。三种靶向白细胞介素(IL)-5 -嗜酸粒细胞途径的生物制剂,包括靶向IL-5本身的mepolizumab和reslizumab,以及靶向IL-5受体(IL- 5r -α)的benralizumab。这些药物都能降低嗜酸性粒细胞升高患者的恶化率。Mepolizumab和benralizumab也显示出类固醇节约功效。瑞珠单抗是唯一一种静脉给药而非皮下给药的生物制剂。Dupilumab靶向IL-4受体,与mepolizumab和benralizumab一样,Dupilumab在降低恶化率和口服皮质类固醇需求方面有效。对鼻息肉病、特应性皮炎也有疗效。Tezepelumab是一种抗tslp(胸腺基质淋巴生成素)单抗,最近完成的3期试验显示,即使在较低的T2生物标志物阈值下,恶化率也显著降低。许多严重哮喘患者有资格使用一种以上的生物制剂。到目前为止,还没有面对面的试验来帮助医生做出这种选择。然而,事后分析已经确定了某些临床特征,这些特征与某些治疗的良好反应有关。应考虑是否存在过敏性和/或嗜酸性粒细胞合并症,如特应性皮炎、鼻息肉病或嗜酸性粒细胞肉芽肿伴多血管炎,这些合并症可能会因生物制剂的选择而受益,患者的偏好也可能包括给药频率。迄今为止,所有的生物制剂都被证明具有良好的安全性。生物疗法针对T2炎症途径,升高的FENO和/或血嗜酸性粒细胞计数与更高的临床疗效相关。药物的选择取决于个体患者的特点和偏好。https://bit.ly/3lHOsSQ
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pragmatic guide to choosing biologic therapies in severe asthma
There are now several monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies (“biologics”) available to treat severe asthma. Omalizumab is an anti-IgE mAb and is licensed in severe allergic asthma. Current evidence suggests it may decrease exacerbations by augmenting deficient antiviral immune responses in asthma. Like all other biologics, clinical efficacy is greatest in those with elevated T2 biomarkers. Three biologics target the interleukin (IL)-5–eosinophil pathway, including mepolizumab and reslizumab that target IL-5 itself, and benralizumab that targets the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R-α). These drugs all reduce the exacerbation rate in those with raised blood eosinophil counts. Mepolizumab and benralizumab have also demonstrated steroid-sparing efficacy. Reslizumab is the only biologic that is given intravenously rather than by the subcutaneous route. Dupilumab targets the IL-4 receptor and like mepolizumab and benralizumab is effective at reducing exacerbation rate as well as oral corticosteroid requirements. It is also effective for the treatment of nasal polyposis and atopic dermatitis. Tezepelumab is an anti-TSLP (thymic stromal lymphopoietin) mAb that has recently completed phase 3 trials demonstrating significant reductions in exacerbation rate even at lower T2 biomarker thresholds. Many patients with severe asthma qualify for more than one biologic. To date, there are no head-to-head trials to aid physicians in this choice. However, post-hoc analyses have identified certain clinical characteristics that are associated with superior responses to some therapies. The presence of allergic and/or eosinophilic comorbidities, such as atopic dermatitis, nasal polyposis or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, that may additionally benefit by the choice of biologic should also be taken into consideration, as should patient preferences which may include dosing frequency. To date, all biologics have been shown to have excellent safety profiles. Biologic therapies target T2 inflammatory pathways and elevated FENO and/or blood eosinophil counts are associated with greater clinical efficacy. Choice of drug will depend on individual patient characteristics and preferences. https://bit.ly/3lHOsSQ
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breathe
Breathe RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信