扩展大陆架的国际特许权使用费:对加拿大、纽芬兰和Equinor的影响

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
A. Terrell
{"title":"扩展大陆架的国际特许权使用费:对加拿大、纽芬兰和Equinor的影响","authors":"A. Terrell","doi":"10.29173/alr2594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canada’s international obligations under Article 82 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea impose domestic responsibilities to determine which party is to absorb the royalty payments owed to the International Seabed Authority. Currently, uncertainty exists in the royalty regime for projects within Canada’s 200 nautical mile limit waters, with multiple disputes arising between parties to sophisticated contracts. Given the comparatively ambiguous Article 82 language, it is important for Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador, and project proponents to come to a clear conclusion as to who will pay the international royalties. This raises the normative questions of which party should ultimately be paying these royalties, and whether Canada should be shifting its obligations to another party.","PeriodicalId":54047,"journal":{"name":"ALBERTA LAW REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Royalties on the Extended Continental Shelf: Implications for Canada, Newfoundland, and Equinor\",\"authors\":\"A. Terrell\",\"doi\":\"10.29173/alr2594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Canada’s international obligations under Article 82 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea impose domestic responsibilities to determine which party is to absorb the royalty payments owed to the International Seabed Authority. Currently, uncertainty exists in the royalty regime for projects within Canada’s 200 nautical mile limit waters, with multiple disputes arising between parties to sophisticated contracts. Given the comparatively ambiguous Article 82 language, it is important for Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador, and project proponents to come to a clear conclusion as to who will pay the international royalties. This raises the normative questions of which party should ultimately be paying these royalties, and whether Canada should be shifting its obligations to another party.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ALBERTA LAW REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ALBERTA LAW REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALBERTA LAW REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大根据《联合国海洋法公约》第82条承担的国际义务规定了国内责任,以确定哪一方将承担欠国际海底管理局的特许权使用费。目前,加拿大200海里限制水域内项目的特许权使用费制度存在不确定性,复杂合同各方之间出现了多起纠纷。鉴于第82条相对模糊的语言,对于加拿大、纽芬兰和拉布拉多以及项目支持者来说,就谁将支付国际特许权使用费达成明确的结论是很重要的。这就提出了规范问题,即哪一方最终应该支付这些特许权使用费,以及加拿大是否应该将其义务转移给另一方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Royalties on the Extended Continental Shelf: Implications for Canada, Newfoundland, and Equinor
Canada’s international obligations under Article 82 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea impose domestic responsibilities to determine which party is to absorb the royalty payments owed to the International Seabed Authority. Currently, uncertainty exists in the royalty regime for projects within Canada’s 200 nautical mile limit waters, with multiple disputes arising between parties to sophisticated contracts. Given the comparatively ambiguous Article 82 language, it is important for Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador, and project proponents to come to a clear conclusion as to who will pay the international royalties. This raises the normative questions of which party should ultimately be paying these royalties, and whether Canada should be shifting its obligations to another party.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信