来自编辑器

IF 0.2 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS

ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/are.2022.0004

R. Woodard, A. Hooper, Nick Ollivère, R. Matera, A. Peterson

{"title":"来自编辑器","authors":"R. Woodard, A. Hooper, Nick Ollivère, R. Matera, A. Peterson","doi":"10.1353/are.2022.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper concerns the episode of Aristophanes' hiccups in Plato's Symposium. The sequence is typically understood to be not merely a comic aside but rather a means by which Aristophanes offers commentary on the claims of the other speakers in the dialogue. But where scholars have focused on the significance of this passage concerning Eryximachus's account of Eros, I argue that the hiccups episode also serves as a critique of Pausanias's speech. Particularly, I suggest that the hiccups episode serves as a critique of the sophistic elements of Pausanias's account of Eros.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"55 1","pages":"101 - 119 - 121 - 148 - 149 - 175 - 177 - 207 - 95 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the Editor\",\"authors\":\"R. Woodard, A. Hooper, Nick Ollivère, R. Matera, A. Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/are.2022.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This paper concerns the episode of Aristophanes' hiccups in Plato's Symposium. The sequence is typically understood to be not merely a comic aside but rather a means by which Aristophanes offers commentary on the claims of the other speakers in the dialogue. But where scholars have focused on the significance of this passage concerning Eryximachus's account of Eros, I argue that the hiccups episode also serves as a critique of Pausanias's speech. Particularly, I suggest that the hiccups episode serves as a critique of the sophistic elements of Pausanias's account of Eros.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 119 - 121 - 148 - 149 - 175 - 177 - 207 - 95 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2022.0004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2022.0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文关注柏拉图《会饮篇》中阿里斯托芬打嗝的情节。这个顺序通常被理解为不仅仅是一个喜剧的旁白，而是阿里斯托芬对对话中其他说话人的主张进行评论的一种方式。但学者们关注的是这段关于厄律克西马库对厄洛斯的描述的意义，我认为打嗝的情节也可以作为对包萨尼亚演讲的批评。特别地，我认为打嗝这一段是对包萨尼亚对爱神的描述中诡辩元素的批判。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

From the Editor

Abstract:This paper concerns the episode of Aristophanes' hiccups in Plato's Symposium. The sequence is typically understood to be not merely a comic aside but rather a means by which Aristophanes offers commentary on the claims of the other speakers in the dialogue. But where scholars have focused on the significance of this passage concerning Eryximachus's account of Eros, I argue that the hiccups episode also serves as a critique of Pausanias's speech. Particularly, I suggest that the hiccups episode serves as a critique of the sophistic elements of Pausanias's account of Eros.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ARETHUSA CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.