应用于盖驱动腔体流动的各种数值方法的比较:耦合算法,交错网格与并置网格,以及FUDS与SUDS

IF 3.4 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. A. Boroujerdi, M. Hamzeh
{"title":"应用于盖驱动腔体流动的各种数值方法的比较:耦合算法,交错网格与并置网格,以及FUDS与SUDS","authors":"A. A. Boroujerdi,&nbsp;M. Hamzeh","doi":"10.1186/s40712-019-0104-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The effectiveness of different methods, schemes, algorithms, and approaches is of substantial challenging problems in numerical modeling of transport phenomena. In the present paper, a lid-driven cavity problem is modeled via two basically different approaches of spatial discretization: collocated and staggered. The non-dimensionalized governing equations are semi-discretized by using a finite volume approach. Then, the full discretization is performed in each of collocated and staggered grids, separately. Upwind and central difference schemes are implemented in order to discretize the convective and diffusion terms of equations, respectively. After mesh independency study, the performances of collocated and staggered grids in comparison with the reference benchmark are presented. Next, the effectiveness of the first and the second order upwind schemes are presented, as well as different coupling algorithms of SIMPLE, SIMPLEC, and SIMPLER. Finally, an overall comparison of the methods is provided and acceptable agreements with benchmark are attained.</p>","PeriodicalId":592,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40712-019-0104-7","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of varieties of numerical methods applied to lid-driven cavity flow: coupling algorithms, staggered grid vs. collocated grid, and FUDS vs. SUDS\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Boroujerdi,&nbsp;M. Hamzeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40712-019-0104-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The effectiveness of different methods, schemes, algorithms, and approaches is of substantial challenging problems in numerical modeling of transport phenomena. In the present paper, a lid-driven cavity problem is modeled via two basically different approaches of spatial discretization: collocated and staggered. The non-dimensionalized governing equations are semi-discretized by using a finite volume approach. Then, the full discretization is performed in each of collocated and staggered grids, separately. Upwind and central difference schemes are implemented in order to discretize the convective and diffusion terms of equations, respectively. After mesh independency study, the performances of collocated and staggered grids in comparison with the reference benchmark are presented. Next, the effectiveness of the first and the second order upwind schemes are presented, as well as different coupling algorithms of SIMPLE, SIMPLEC, and SIMPLER. Finally, an overall comparison of the methods is provided and acceptable agreements with benchmark are attained.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40712-019-0104-7\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40712-019-0104-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40712-019-0104-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

不同的方法、方案、算法和方法的有效性是输运现象数值模拟中具有实质性挑战性的问题。在本文中,通过两种基本不同的空间离散方法:配位和交错,对盖驱动空腔问题进行了建模。采用有限体积法对无量纲化控制方程进行半离散化。然后,分别对并置网格和交错网格进行完全离散化。采用逆风差分格式和中心差分格式分别实现对流项和扩散项的离散化。通过对网格独立性的研究,给出了并置网格和交错网格的性能与参考基准的比较。其次,介绍了一阶和二阶迎风方案的有效性,以及SIMPLE、SIMPLEC和SIMPLE三种不同的耦合算法。最后,对几种方法进行了综合比较,得到了与基准比较较为一致的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of varieties of numerical methods applied to lid-driven cavity flow: coupling algorithms, staggered grid vs. collocated grid, and FUDS vs. SUDS

Comparison of varieties of numerical methods applied to lid-driven cavity flow: coupling algorithms, staggered grid vs. collocated grid, and FUDS vs. SUDS

The effectiveness of different methods, schemes, algorithms, and approaches is of substantial challenging problems in numerical modeling of transport phenomena. In the present paper, a lid-driven cavity problem is modeled via two basically different approaches of spatial discretization: collocated and staggered. The non-dimensionalized governing equations are semi-discretized by using a finite volume approach. Then, the full discretization is performed in each of collocated and staggered grids, separately. Upwind and central difference schemes are implemented in order to discretize the convective and diffusion terms of equations, respectively. After mesh independency study, the performances of collocated and staggered grids in comparison with the reference benchmark are presented. Next, the effectiveness of the first and the second order upwind schemes are presented, as well as different coupling algorithms of SIMPLE, SIMPLEC, and SIMPLER. Finally, an overall comparison of the methods is provided and acceptable agreements with benchmark are attained.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信