大流行期间的多元文化崇拜运动

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Karen Campbell
{"title":"大流行期间的多元文化崇拜运动","authors":"Karen Campbell","doi":"10.1080/0458063X.2022.2026177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There can be no doubt that the 2020 global pandemic excavated many rudimentary principles. It highlighted humanity’s global interconnectedness and interdependence both biologically, scientifically, and economically. Yet, it also exposed the cruel underbelly of global systems that protected dominant voices at the expense of the vulnerable. In theory, the communities best placed to handle the pandemic with agility were diaspora communities that already operated within glocal yet also borderless, multicultural, transnational, and multidirectional territories. The church as the body of Christ should have the capacity to do the same. Yet without self-critical vigilance, congregations that function within the name of multiculturalism can also fall prey to a dynamic where dominant voices temper and constrain minority voices. How then can a worshiping community, romanced by the notion of hybridity, sustain true, equitable multicultural worship in a way that is not valorized or endorsed by hierarchy in such times as these? This paper describes two urban multicultural worshiping communities from a postcolonial perspective. One is Church of the Servant, Grand Rapids, Michigan, in the Christian Reformed Church of North America. The second is Galway United Methodist and Presbyterian Church in Ireland. These congregations are both reformed, liturgical, urban, and have similar sympathies toward asylum seekers, refugees, and migrant workers. This description will consider worship transitions negotiated in response to the social restrictions enforced through the pandemic and how they celebrated the subaltern wisdom, creativity, and even resistance to dominant supposed “norms” in the worship space. A helpful tool for analyzing the drift toward multicultural worship is Ian Collinge’s “Moving from monocultural to multicultural worship” which identifies five positions toward multiculturalism: inherited, independent, inclusive, integrated, and innovative fusion. In inherited, there is unity without diversity. Independent groups have diversity without unity––the church is separated into ethno-linguistic congregations. Inclusive music is where there is unity with invited diversity: different groups are invited to sing songs in their own style. Integrated music is unity with blended diversity where cultures attempt to learn each other’s songs. The final position is of innovative fusion where church musicians learn new music together, exercising a blended approach to culturally conscious worship. This paper will attempt to locate each congregation on Collinge’s spectrum before and then during the pandemic to identify shifts that have taken place. Sites of contrapuntality will also be identified according to Edward Said’s use of the term which uncovers juxtapositions that reveal colonial implications.","PeriodicalId":53923,"journal":{"name":"Liturgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Movements toward Multicultural Worship during a Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Karen Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0458063X.2022.2026177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There can be no doubt that the 2020 global pandemic excavated many rudimentary principles. It highlighted humanity’s global interconnectedness and interdependence both biologically, scientifically, and economically. Yet, it also exposed the cruel underbelly of global systems that protected dominant voices at the expense of the vulnerable. In theory, the communities best placed to handle the pandemic with agility were diaspora communities that already operated within glocal yet also borderless, multicultural, transnational, and multidirectional territories. The church as the body of Christ should have the capacity to do the same. Yet without self-critical vigilance, congregations that function within the name of multiculturalism can also fall prey to a dynamic where dominant voices temper and constrain minority voices. How then can a worshiping community, romanced by the notion of hybridity, sustain true, equitable multicultural worship in a way that is not valorized or endorsed by hierarchy in such times as these? This paper describes two urban multicultural worshiping communities from a postcolonial perspective. One is Church of the Servant, Grand Rapids, Michigan, in the Christian Reformed Church of North America. The second is Galway United Methodist and Presbyterian Church in Ireland. These congregations are both reformed, liturgical, urban, and have similar sympathies toward asylum seekers, refugees, and migrant workers. This description will consider worship transitions negotiated in response to the social restrictions enforced through the pandemic and how they celebrated the subaltern wisdom, creativity, and even resistance to dominant supposed “norms” in the worship space. A helpful tool for analyzing the drift toward multicultural worship is Ian Collinge’s “Moving from monocultural to multicultural worship” which identifies five positions toward multiculturalism: inherited, independent, inclusive, integrated, and innovative fusion. In inherited, there is unity without diversity. Independent groups have diversity without unity––the church is separated into ethno-linguistic congregations. Inclusive music is where there is unity with invited diversity: different groups are invited to sing songs in their own style. Integrated music is unity with blended diversity where cultures attempt to learn each other’s songs. The final position is of innovative fusion where church musicians learn new music together, exercising a blended approach to culturally conscious worship. This paper will attempt to locate each congregation on Collinge’s spectrum before and then during the pandemic to identify shifts that have taken place. Sites of contrapuntality will also be identified according to Edward Said’s use of the term which uncovers juxtapositions that reveal colonial implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liturgy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liturgy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2022.2026177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liturgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2022.2026177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毫无疑问,2020年的全球大流行挖掘了许多基本原则。它强调了人类在生物、科学和经济方面的全球相互联系和相互依存。然而,它也暴露了全球体系的残酷弱点,即以牺牲弱势群体为代价来保护占主导地位的声音。理论上,最有能力灵活应对大流行的社区是那些已经在全球、当地但也在无国界、多元文化、跨国和多方位领域内开展活动的侨民社区。教会作为基督的身体,应该有能力这样做。然而,如果没有自我批判的警惕,以多元文化主义的名义运作的会众也可能成为一种动态的牺牲品,在这种动态中,占主导地位的声音会压制和约束少数人的声音。那么,在这样的时代,一个被混杂概念所浪漫化的礼拜社区,如何以一种不受等级制度推崇或认可的方式,维持真正、公平的多元文化崇拜呢?本文从后殖民视角描述了两个城市多元文化礼拜社区。其中一个是北美归正教会的仆人教会,位于密歇根州大急流城。第二个是爱尔兰的戈尔韦联合卫理公会和长老会。这些会众都是改革的,礼拜的,城市的,并且对寻求庇护者,难民和移民工人有类似的同情。本描述将考虑为应对大流行期间实施的社会限制而协商的崇拜过渡,以及他们如何庆祝次等智慧,创造力,甚至抵制崇拜空间中占主导地位的所谓“规范”。伊恩·科林奇的《从单一文化到多元文化崇拜》是分析多元文化崇拜趋势的一个有用工具,他指出了多元文化主义的五种立场:继承、独立、包容、整合和创新融合。在继承中,没有多样性就有统一。独立的团体有多样性,但没有统一性——教会被分成不同民族语言的会众。包容性音乐是在邀请多样性的同时保持统一:不同的群体被邀请以自己的风格演唱歌曲。融合音乐是融合多样性的统一,不同文化试图学习彼此的歌曲。最后一个位置是创新的融合,教会音乐家一起学习新的音乐,运用一种混合的方法来进行文化意识的崇拜。本文将尝试在大流行之前和期间确定每个聚集在Collinge谱上的位置,以确定已经发生的变化。对位的地点也将根据爱德华·赛义德对这个术语的使用来确定它揭示了揭示殖民含义的并置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Movements toward Multicultural Worship during a Pandemic
There can be no doubt that the 2020 global pandemic excavated many rudimentary principles. It highlighted humanity’s global interconnectedness and interdependence both biologically, scientifically, and economically. Yet, it also exposed the cruel underbelly of global systems that protected dominant voices at the expense of the vulnerable. In theory, the communities best placed to handle the pandemic with agility were diaspora communities that already operated within glocal yet also borderless, multicultural, transnational, and multidirectional territories. The church as the body of Christ should have the capacity to do the same. Yet without self-critical vigilance, congregations that function within the name of multiculturalism can also fall prey to a dynamic where dominant voices temper and constrain minority voices. How then can a worshiping community, romanced by the notion of hybridity, sustain true, equitable multicultural worship in a way that is not valorized or endorsed by hierarchy in such times as these? This paper describes two urban multicultural worshiping communities from a postcolonial perspective. One is Church of the Servant, Grand Rapids, Michigan, in the Christian Reformed Church of North America. The second is Galway United Methodist and Presbyterian Church in Ireland. These congregations are both reformed, liturgical, urban, and have similar sympathies toward asylum seekers, refugees, and migrant workers. This description will consider worship transitions negotiated in response to the social restrictions enforced through the pandemic and how they celebrated the subaltern wisdom, creativity, and even resistance to dominant supposed “norms” in the worship space. A helpful tool for analyzing the drift toward multicultural worship is Ian Collinge’s “Moving from monocultural to multicultural worship” which identifies five positions toward multiculturalism: inherited, independent, inclusive, integrated, and innovative fusion. In inherited, there is unity without diversity. Independent groups have diversity without unity––the church is separated into ethno-linguistic congregations. Inclusive music is where there is unity with invited diversity: different groups are invited to sing songs in their own style. Integrated music is unity with blended diversity where cultures attempt to learn each other’s songs. The final position is of innovative fusion where church musicians learn new music together, exercising a blended approach to culturally conscious worship. This paper will attempt to locate each congregation on Collinge’s spectrum before and then during the pandemic to identify shifts that have taken place. Sites of contrapuntality will also be identified according to Edward Said’s use of the term which uncovers juxtapositions that reveal colonial implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liturgy
Liturgy RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信