葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂钠配药的全国趋势。

IF 0.6 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
M. Fralick, Diana Martins, Mina Tadrous, T. Gomes
{"title":"葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂钠配药的全国趋势。","authors":"M. Fralick, Diana Martins, Mina Tadrous, T. Gomes","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThree large cardiovascular outcome trials have investigated the safety of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.\n\n\nObjective\nTo analyze the nationwide dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors before and after the publication of these trials.\n\n\nMethods\nA cross-sectional study was conducted of monthly prescription dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors from May 23, 2014, to April 30, 2019, using nationwide data for Canada. An autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was fitted to the monthly number of tablets dispensed for each SGLT2 inhibitor; the model included a ramp intervention function at the publication dates of interest to estimate the impact on SGLT2 inhibitor dispensing patterns.\n\n\nResults\nThe rate of canagliflozin and dapagliflozin dispensing declined after publication of results of the empagliflozin cardiovascular trial in September 2015. After publication of results of the canagliflozin trial in June 2017, which indicated a reduction in cardiovascular events and an increase in the risk of lower-limb amputation, canagliflozin remained the most commonly dispensed SGLT2 inhibitor, but its rate of dispensing declined further. In contrast, the rate of empagliflozin dispensing increased, while the rate of dapagliflozin dispensing was unchanged. After publication of the dapagliflozin trial in November 2018, which indicated no clear reduction in cardiovascular events, short-term trends in dispensing of canagliflozin, empagliflozin, and dapagliflozin were largely unaffected.\n\n\nConclusions\nThe cardiovascular outcome trials appeared to have an important impact on the dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors in Canada.","PeriodicalId":51646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","volume":"75 2 1","pages":"104-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide Trends in Dispensing of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"M. Fralick, Diana Martins, Mina Tadrous, T. Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nThree large cardiovascular outcome trials have investigated the safety of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.\\n\\n\\nObjective\\nTo analyze the nationwide dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors before and after the publication of these trials.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nA cross-sectional study was conducted of monthly prescription dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors from May 23, 2014, to April 30, 2019, using nationwide data for Canada. An autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was fitted to the monthly number of tablets dispensed for each SGLT2 inhibitor; the model included a ramp intervention function at the publication dates of interest to estimate the impact on SGLT2 inhibitor dispensing patterns.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nThe rate of canagliflozin and dapagliflozin dispensing declined after publication of results of the empagliflozin cardiovascular trial in September 2015. After publication of results of the canagliflozin trial in June 2017, which indicated a reduction in cardiovascular events and an increase in the risk of lower-limb amputation, canagliflozin remained the most commonly dispensed SGLT2 inhibitor, but its rate of dispensing declined further. In contrast, the rate of empagliflozin dispensing increased, while the rate of dapagliflozin dispensing was unchanged. After publication of the dapagliflozin trial in November 2018, which indicated no clear reduction in cardiovascular events, short-term trends in dispensing of canagliflozin, empagliflozin, and dapagliflozin were largely unaffected.\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nThe cardiovascular outcome trials appeared to have an important impact on the dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors in Canada.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY\",\"volume\":\"75 2 1\",\"pages\":\"104-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

三个大型心血管结局试验研究了葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂钠的安全性。目的分析SGLT2抑制剂临床试验发表前后的全国配药情况。方法使用加拿大全国数据,对2014年5月23日至2019年4月30日期间SGLT2抑制剂每月处方配药情况进行横断面研究。采用自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)模型拟合每个SGLT2抑制剂的月片数;该模型在发表日期包括一个斜坡干预函数,以估计对SGLT2抑制剂分配模式的影响。结果2015年9月恩格列净心血管试验结果公布后,卡格列净和达格列净的配药率下降。2017年6月,卡格列净试验结果公布后,表明心血管事件减少,下肢截肢风险增加,卡格列净仍然是最常用的SGLT2抑制剂,但其配药率进一步下降。相比之下,恩格列净的配药率增加,达格列净的配药率不变。2018年11月发表的达格列净试验表明,心血管事件没有明显减少,但卡格列净、恩格列净和达格列净的配药短期趋势基本未受影响。结论:心血管结局试验似乎对加拿大SGLT2抑制剂的配药有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nationwide Trends in Dispensing of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors.
Background Three large cardiovascular outcome trials have investigated the safety of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Objective To analyze the nationwide dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors before and after the publication of these trials. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted of monthly prescription dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors from May 23, 2014, to April 30, 2019, using nationwide data for Canada. An autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was fitted to the monthly number of tablets dispensed for each SGLT2 inhibitor; the model included a ramp intervention function at the publication dates of interest to estimate the impact on SGLT2 inhibitor dispensing patterns. Results The rate of canagliflozin and dapagliflozin dispensing declined after publication of results of the empagliflozin cardiovascular trial in September 2015. After publication of results of the canagliflozin trial in June 2017, which indicated a reduction in cardiovascular events and an increase in the risk of lower-limb amputation, canagliflozin remained the most commonly dispensed SGLT2 inhibitor, but its rate of dispensing declined further. In contrast, the rate of empagliflozin dispensing increased, while the rate of dapagliflozin dispensing was unchanged. After publication of the dapagliflozin trial in November 2018, which indicated no clear reduction in cardiovascular events, short-term trends in dispensing of canagliflozin, empagliflozin, and dapagliflozin were largely unaffected. Conclusions The cardiovascular outcome trials appeared to have an important impact on the dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors in Canada.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The CJHP is an academic journal that focuses on how pharmacists in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings optimize safe and effective drug use for patients in Canada and throughout the world. The aim of the CJHP is to be a respected international publication serving as a major venue for dissemination of information related to patient-centred pharmacy practice in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings in Canada and throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信