内战时期的奴隶制与自由:拉·波萨梅、拉·洛必达和蒙田

IF 0.1 3区历史学 Q2 HISTORY

Early Modern French Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/20563035.2022.2076316

J. O’Brien

{"title":"内战时期的奴隶制与自由:拉·波萨梅、拉·洛必达和蒙田","authors":"J. O’Brien","doi":"10.1080/20563035.2022.2076316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern ‘neo-Roman' or ‘republican' concept of freedom as liberty from the arbitrary will of another is the starting point for a discussion of three French Renaissance magistrates for whom freedom is paramount political question: La Boétie, L'Hospital, and Montaigne. The first of these sees freedom in ontological terms, the foundation of being as well as of any political system in the form of freedom of expression and amitié. The article shows that that these values are severely tested by the French Wars of Religion. L’Hospital claims that personal and collective liberty is compatible with monarchical rule and submission to the will of another. This attempt to reconcile domination and non-domination is then greatly refined by Montaigne who re-frames the premises of this debate in terms which develop the role of historical figures such as Socrates and Lucan in the defence of individual and civic freedom.","PeriodicalId":40652,"journal":{"name":"Early Modern French Studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"53 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slavery and Freedom in a Time of Civil War: La Boétie, L’Hospital, and Montaigne\",\"authors\":\"J. O’Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20563035.2022.2076316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modern ‘neo-Roman' or ‘republican' concept of freedom as liberty from the arbitrary will of another is the starting point for a discussion of three French Renaissance magistrates for whom freedom is paramount political question: La Boétie, L'Hospital, and Montaigne. The first of these sees freedom in ontological terms, the foundation of being as well as of any political system in the form of freedom of expression and amitié. The article shows that that these values are severely tested by the French Wars of Religion. L’Hospital claims that personal and collective liberty is compatible with monarchical rule and submission to the will of another. This attempt to reconcile domination and non-domination is then greatly refined by Montaigne who re-frames the premises of this debate in terms which develop the role of historical figures such as Socrates and Lucan in the defence of individual and civic freedom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Modern French Studies\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"53 - 69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Modern French Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20563035.2022.2076316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Modern French Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20563035.2022.2076316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

现代“新罗马”或“共和”的自由概念，即从另一个人的任意意志中获得自由，是三位法国文艺复兴时期法官的讨论的起点，对他们来说，自由是最重要的政治问题:La bosamade, L' hospital和Montaigne。第一种是从本体论的角度来看待自由，自由是存在的基础，也是任何政治制度的基础，表现形式是言论和言论自由。文章表明，这些价值观受到了法国宗教战争的严峻考验。洛必达声称，个人和集体自由与君主统治和对他人意志的服从是相容的。这种调和统治和非统治的尝试后来被蒙田大大改进，他重新构建了这场辩论的前提，发展了苏格拉底和卢坎等历史人物在捍卫个人和公民自由方面的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Slavery and Freedom in a Time of Civil War: La Boétie, L’Hospital, and Montaigne

The modern ‘neo-Roman' or ‘republican' concept of freedom as liberty from the arbitrary will of another is the starting point for a discussion of three French Renaissance magistrates for whom freedom is paramount political question: La Boétie, L'Hospital, and Montaigne. The first of these sees freedom in ontological terms, the foundation of being as well as of any political system in the form of freedom of expression and amitié. The article shows that that these values are severely tested by the French Wars of Religion. L’Hospital claims that personal and collective liberty is compatible with monarchical rule and submission to the will of another. This attempt to reconcile domination and non-domination is then greatly refined by Montaigne who re-frames the premises of this debate in terms which develop the role of historical figures such as Socrates and Lucan in the defence of individual and civic freedom.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Early Modern French Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Early Modern French Studies (formerly Seventeenth-Century French Studies) publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original articles in English and French on a broad range of literary, cultural, methodological, and theoretical topics relating to the study of early modern France. The journal has expanded its historical scope and now covers work on the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries. Within this period of French literary and cultural history, the journal particularly welcomes work that relates to the term ''early modern'', as well as work that interrogates it. It continues to publish special issues devoted to particular topics (such as the highly successful 2014 special issue on the cultural history of fans) as well as individual submissions.