在一家大型三级中心建立专门的外部头畸形诊所后的产科结果:一项为期3年的前瞻性队列研究

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
K. Papadakis, S. Myriknas, L. Kidd, Natasha Singh
{"title":"在一家大型三级中心建立专门的外部头畸形诊所后的产科结果:一项为期3年的前瞻性队列研究","authors":"K. Papadakis, S. Myriknas, L. Kidd, Natasha Singh","doi":"10.14390/jsshp.hrp2020-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: External cephalic version (ECV) is the main intervention for facilitating vaginal birth without increasing intrapartum mortality and neonatal morbidity in term breech pregnancies. We appraise the hypothesis that the introduction of a specialised ECV clinic reduces preventable caesareans without compromising neonatal well-being. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study over a period of 3 years. Data were collected via attendance in the ECV clinic and women were followed up until the delivery and the postnatal period. Obstetric and neonatal notes were reviewed in order to assess obstetric data and fetal outcomes. Results: 181 suitable women with singleton pregnancy were included in our sample, from which 28 opted for elective caesarean delivery. 81% of the eligible women underwent an ECV. From the 120 ECVs performed, 78 women were nulliparous and 42 multiparous. The ECV was successful in a total of 64 cases (54%), 49% in nulliparous and 62% in multiparous women. Following that, 78% delivered vaginally of which 25% needed instrumental delivery. There were not any adverse events during the ECVs and no woman underwent emergency caesarean section for fetal distress due to the procedure. Conclusion: Our experience favours the ECV clinic, as it improves vaginal delivery rates with no obvious maternal and neonatal compromise. Cost-effectiveness and maternal satisfaction levels remain unknown. There is still room for improvement in detection, uptake and success ECV rates.","PeriodicalId":42505,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetric outcomes after instituting a dedicated External Cephalic Version clinic in a large tertiary centre: a 3-year prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"K. Papadakis, S. Myriknas, L. Kidd, Natasha Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.14390/jsshp.hrp2020-010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: External cephalic version (ECV) is the main intervention for facilitating vaginal birth without increasing intrapartum mortality and neonatal morbidity in term breech pregnancies. We appraise the hypothesis that the introduction of a specialised ECV clinic reduces preventable caesareans without compromising neonatal well-being. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study over a period of 3 years. Data were collected via attendance in the ECV clinic and women were followed up until the delivery and the postnatal period. Obstetric and neonatal notes were reviewed in order to assess obstetric data and fetal outcomes. Results: 181 suitable women with singleton pregnancy were included in our sample, from which 28 opted for elective caesarean delivery. 81% of the eligible women underwent an ECV. From the 120 ECVs performed, 78 women were nulliparous and 42 multiparous. The ECV was successful in a total of 64 cases (54%), 49% in nulliparous and 62% in multiparous women. Following that, 78% delivered vaginally of which 25% needed instrumental delivery. There were not any adverse events during the ECVs and no woman underwent emergency caesarean section for fetal distress due to the procedure. Conclusion: Our experience favours the ECV clinic, as it improves vaginal delivery rates with no obvious maternal and neonatal compromise. Cost-effectiveness and maternal satisfaction levels remain unknown. There is still room for improvement in detection, uptake and success ECV rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14390/jsshp.hrp2020-010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14390/jsshp.hrp2020-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在不增加足月臀位妊娠产时死亡率和新生儿发病率的情况下,头外翻转(ECV)是促进阴道分娩的主要干预措施。我们评估了这样一种假设,即引入专门的ECV诊所可以在不影响新生儿健康的情况下减少可预防的剖腹产。方法:这是一项为期3年的前瞻性队列研究。通过在ECV诊所就诊收集数据,并对女性进行随访,直到分娩和产后。对产科和新生儿记录进行了审查,以评估产科数据和胎儿结局。结果:181名适合单胎妊娠的女性被纳入我们的样本,其中28人选择了选择性剖腹产。81%符合条件的妇女接受了ECV。在120例ECV中,78例为未产妇,42例为多胎。ECV在总共64例(54%)中成功,在未产妇中成功49%,在多胎妇女中成功62%。之后,78%通过阴道分娩,其中25%需要器械分娩。ECVs期间没有发生任何不良事件,也没有女性因该手术导致胎儿窘迫而接受紧急剖腹产手术。结论:我们的经验有利于ECV临床,因为它可以提高阴道分娩率,而不会对产妇和新生儿造成明显的损害。成本效益和产妇满意度仍然未知。ECV的检测率、吸收率和成功率仍有提高的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstetric outcomes after instituting a dedicated External Cephalic Version clinic in a large tertiary centre: a 3-year prospective cohort study
Aim: External cephalic version (ECV) is the main intervention for facilitating vaginal birth without increasing intrapartum mortality and neonatal morbidity in term breech pregnancies. We appraise the hypothesis that the introduction of a specialised ECV clinic reduces preventable caesareans without compromising neonatal well-being. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study over a period of 3 years. Data were collected via attendance in the ECV clinic and women were followed up until the delivery and the postnatal period. Obstetric and neonatal notes were reviewed in order to assess obstetric data and fetal outcomes. Results: 181 suitable women with singleton pregnancy were included in our sample, from which 28 opted for elective caesarean delivery. 81% of the eligible women underwent an ECV. From the 120 ECVs performed, 78 women were nulliparous and 42 multiparous. The ECV was successful in a total of 64 cases (54%), 49% in nulliparous and 62% in multiparous women. Following that, 78% delivered vaginally of which 25% needed instrumental delivery. There were not any adverse events during the ECVs and no woman underwent emergency caesarean section for fetal distress due to the procedure. Conclusion: Our experience favours the ECV clinic, as it improves vaginal delivery rates with no obvious maternal and neonatal compromise. Cost-effectiveness and maternal satisfaction levels remain unknown. There is still room for improvement in detection, uptake and success ECV rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信