用ahp法评价加约黑莓阿拉比卡咖啡的感官

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
R. Fadhil, S. Safrizal, P. Navisah
{"title":"用ahp法评价加约黑莓阿拉比卡咖啡的感官","authors":"R. Fadhil, S. Safrizal, P. Navisah","doi":"10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-3-58-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As other peaberrys, Gayo peaberry arabica coffee is very attractive because it has single larger and rounder seed. It is believed that the peaberry has superior flavor profile such as more fragrant aroma, stronger flavor, and denser than other arabica coffees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Gayo peaberry arabica coffee by using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. Three varieties of Gayo peaberry arabica coffee were investigated i.e., Tim-tim, Bor-bor, and P88, while the processing method used were semi-wash and fully-wash methods. The sensory parameters observed included fragrance, flavor, acidity, body, and sweetness. The results showed that flavor (0.338) was the most important criterion than other taste criteria (fragrance 0.241; sweetness 0.196; acidity 0.115; and body 0.111). The variety that had the highest product acceptance rate was the Tim-tim variety processed by a full-wash method with a value of 0.203. The overall result of data analysis was acceptable because it had a consistency ratio below 0.1 (10%).","PeriodicalId":21854,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SENSORY EVALUATION OF GAYO PEABERRY ARABICA COFFEE BY USING THE AHP METHOD\",\"authors\":\"R. Fadhil, S. Safrizal, P. Navisah\",\"doi\":\"10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-3-58-70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As other peaberrys, Gayo peaberry arabica coffee is very attractive because it has single larger and rounder seed. It is believed that the peaberry has superior flavor profile such as more fragrant aroma, stronger flavor, and denser than other arabica coffees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Gayo peaberry arabica coffee by using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. Three varieties of Gayo peaberry arabica coffee were investigated i.e., Tim-tim, Bor-bor, and P88, while the processing method used were semi-wash and fully-wash methods. The sensory parameters observed included fragrance, flavor, acidity, body, and sweetness. The results showed that flavor (0.338) was the most important criterion than other taste criteria (fragrance 0.241; sweetness 0.196; acidity 0.115; and body 0.111). The variety that had the highest product acceptance rate was the Tim-tim variety processed by a full-wash method with a value of 0.203. The overall result of data analysis was acceptable because it had a consistency ratio below 0.1 (10%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":21854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-3-58-70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-3-58-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

和其他豆一样,Gayo阿拉比卡豆咖啡非常有吸引力,因为它有一个更大、更圆的种子。据信,与其他阿拉比卡咖啡相比,这种咖啡具有更香、更浓、更浓的风味。本研究采用层次分析法(AHP)对Gayo豆阿拉比卡咖啡进行评价。研究了三个品种的Gayo peaberry arabica咖啡,即Tim Tim、Bor Bor和P88,所用的加工方法为半洗涤和全洗涤。观察到的感官参数包括香味、风味、酸度、身体和甜味。结果表明,风味(0.338)是最重要的标准,而不是其他口味标准(香味0.241;甜味0.196;酸度0.115;酒体0.111)。产品合格率最高的品种是采用全洗法加工的蒂姆品种,其值为0.203。数据分析的总体结果是可以接受的,因为它的一致性比率低于0.1(10%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SENSORY EVALUATION OF GAYO PEABERRY ARABICA COFFEE BY USING THE AHP METHOD
As other peaberrys, Gayo peaberry arabica coffee is very attractive because it has single larger and rounder seed. It is believed that the peaberry has superior flavor profile such as more fragrant aroma, stronger flavor, and denser than other arabica coffees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Gayo peaberry arabica coffee by using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. Three varieties of Gayo peaberry arabica coffee were investigated i.e., Tim-tim, Bor-bor, and P88, while the processing method used were semi-wash and fully-wash methods. The sensory parameters observed included fragrance, flavor, acidity, body, and sweetness. The results showed that flavor (0.338) was the most important criterion than other taste criteria (fragrance 0.241; sweetness 0.196; acidity 0.115; and body 0.111). The variety that had the highest product acceptance rate was the Tim-tim variety processed by a full-wash method with a value of 0.203. The overall result of data analysis was acceptable because it had a consistency ratio below 0.1 (10%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture
Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信