英国最高法院最近对通用动力诉利比亚案的判决:棘手的案件(并不总是)产生糟糕的法律

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW

Journal of International Arbitration Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.54648/joia2022012

Michael Howe

{"title":"英国最高法院最近对通用动力诉利比亚案的判决:棘手的案件(并不总是)产生糟糕的法律","authors":"Michael Howe","doi":"10.54648/joia2022012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In General Dynamics v. Libya, the UK Supreme Court was asked to decide whether the only means for serving on a sovereign state an order enforcing an international arbitral award under the New York Convention was via diplomatic channels. The Supreme Court decided, by a bare majority, that service via diplomatic channels was mandatory. This case note reviews and analyses the Supreme Court’s decision.\nState Immunity, Service, Proceedings, Sovereign State, Enforcement Order, Hard Cases, UK Supreme Court","PeriodicalId":43527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Arbitration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case Note on the UK Supreme Court’s Recent Decision in General Dynamics v. Libya: Hard Cases (Don’t Always) Make Bad Law\",\"authors\":\"Michael Howe\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/joia2022012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In General Dynamics v. Libya, the UK Supreme Court was asked to decide whether the only means for serving on a sovereign state an order enforcing an international arbitral award under the New York Convention was via diplomatic channels. The Supreme Court decided, by a bare majority, that service via diplomatic channels was mandatory. This case note reviews and analyses the Supreme Court’s decision.\\nState Immunity, Service, Proceedings, Sovereign State, Enforcement Order, Hard Cases, UK Supreme Court\",\"PeriodicalId\":43527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Arbitration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Arbitration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2022012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2022012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在通用动力诉利比亚案中，英国最高法院被要求裁定，根据《纽约公约》向主权国家执行国际仲裁裁决的命令是否只能通过外交渠道。最高法院以微弱多数裁定，通过外交渠道送达是强制性的。本案例笔记回顾并分析了最高法院的判决。国家豁免，服务，诉讼，主权国家，执行命令，疑难案件，英国最高法院

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Case Note on the UK Supreme Court’s Recent Decision in General Dynamics v. Libya: Hard Cases (Don’t Always) Make Bad Law

In General Dynamics v. Libya, the UK Supreme Court was asked to decide whether the only means for serving on a sovereign state an order enforcing an international arbitral award under the New York Convention was via diplomatic channels. The Supreme Court decided, by a bare majority, that service via diplomatic channels was mandatory. This case note reviews and analyses the Supreme Court’s decision. State Immunity, Service, Proceedings, Sovereign State, Enforcement Order, Hard Cases, UK Supreme Court

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of International Arbitration LAW-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

50.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its 1984 launch, the Journal of International Arbitration has established itself as a thought provoking, ground breaking journal aimed at the specific requirements of those involved in international arbitration. Each issue contains in depth investigations of the most important current issues in international arbitration, focusing on business, investment, and economic disputes between private corporations, State controlled entities, and States. The new Notes and Current Developments sections contain concise and critical commentary on new developments. The journal’s worldwide coverage and bimonthly circulation give it even more immediacy as a forum for original thinking, penetrating analysis and lively discussion of international arbitration issues from around the globe.