基于岩体分类和运动学分析的NH-1A沿线Ramban - Banihal主要边坡稳定性评价

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Amit Jaiswal, A.K. Verma, T.N. Singh
{"title":"基于岩体分类和运动学分析的NH-1A沿线Ramban - Banihal主要边坡稳定性评价","authors":"Amit Jaiswal,&nbsp;A.K. Verma,&nbsp;T.N. Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The network of Himalayan roadways and highways connects some remote regions of valleys or hill slopes, which is vital for India's socio-economic growth. Due to natural and artificial factors, frequency of slope instabilities along the networks has been increasing over last few decades. Assessment of stability of natural and artificial slopes due to construction of these connecting road networks is significant in safely executing these roads throughout the year. Several rock mass classification methods are generally used to assess the strength and deformability of rock mass. This study assesses slope stability along the NH-1A of Ramban district of North Western Himalayas. Various structurally and non-structurally controlled rock mass classification systems have been applied to assess the stability conditions of 14 slopes. For evaluating the stability of these slopes, kinematic analysis was performed along with geological strength index (GSI), rock mass rating (RMR), continuous slope mass rating (CoSMR), slope mass rating (SMR), and Q-slope in the present study. The SMR gives three slopes as completely unstable while CoSMR suggests four slopes as completely unstable. The stability of all slopes was also analyzed using a design chart under dynamic and static conditions by slope stability rating (SSR) for the factor of safety (FoS) of 1.2 and 1 respectively. Q-slope with probability of failure (PoF) 1% gives two slopes as stable slopes. Stable slope angle has been determined based on the Q-slope safe angle equation and SSR design chart based on the FoS. The value ranges given by different empirical classifications were RMR (37–74), GSI (27.3–58.5), SMR (11–59), and CoSMR (3.39–74.56). Good relationship was found among RMR &amp; SSR and RMR &amp; GSI with correlation coefficient (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup>) value of 0.815 and 0.6866, respectively. Lastly, a comparative stability of all these slopes based on the above classification has been performed to identify the most critical slope along this road.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 167-182"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523000902/pdfft?md5=a40b98600511abfdf0ac749240a5d011&pid=1-s2.0-S1674775523000902-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of slope stability through rock mass classification and kinematic analysis of some major slopes along NH-1A from Ramban to Banihal, North Western Himalayas\",\"authors\":\"Amit Jaiswal,&nbsp;A.K. Verma,&nbsp;T.N. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.02.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The network of Himalayan roadways and highways connects some remote regions of valleys or hill slopes, which is vital for India's socio-economic growth. Due to natural and artificial factors, frequency of slope instabilities along the networks has been increasing over last few decades. Assessment of stability of natural and artificial slopes due to construction of these connecting road networks is significant in safely executing these roads throughout the year. Several rock mass classification methods are generally used to assess the strength and deformability of rock mass. This study assesses slope stability along the NH-1A of Ramban district of North Western Himalayas. Various structurally and non-structurally controlled rock mass classification systems have been applied to assess the stability conditions of 14 slopes. For evaluating the stability of these slopes, kinematic analysis was performed along with geological strength index (GSI), rock mass rating (RMR), continuous slope mass rating (CoSMR), slope mass rating (SMR), and Q-slope in the present study. The SMR gives three slopes as completely unstable while CoSMR suggests four slopes as completely unstable. The stability of all slopes was also analyzed using a design chart under dynamic and static conditions by slope stability rating (SSR) for the factor of safety (FoS) of 1.2 and 1 respectively. Q-slope with probability of failure (PoF) 1% gives two slopes as stable slopes. Stable slope angle has been determined based on the Q-slope safe angle equation and SSR design chart based on the FoS. The value ranges given by different empirical classifications were RMR (37–74), GSI (27.3–58.5), SMR (11–59), and CoSMR (3.39–74.56). Good relationship was found among RMR &amp; SSR and RMR &amp; GSI with correlation coefficient (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup>) value of 0.815 and 0.6866, respectively. Lastly, a comparative stability of all these slopes based on the above classification has been performed to identify the most critical slope along this road.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 167-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523000902/pdfft?md5=a40b98600511abfdf0ac749240a5d011&pid=1-s2.0-S1674775523000902-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523000902\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523000902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

喜马拉雅山公路和高速公路网连接着一些偏远地区的山谷或山坡,对印度的社会经济发展至关重要。过去几十年来,由于自然和人为因素,公路网沿线斜坡失稳的频率不断增加。评估因修建这些连接道路网而造成的天然和人工斜坡的稳定性,对于全年安全地修建这些道路意义重大。一般采用几种岩体分类方法来评估岩体的强度和变形能力。本研究对喜马拉雅山脉西北部兰班地区 NH-1A 公路沿线的边坡稳定性进行了评估。在评估 14 个斜坡的稳定性条件时,采用了各种结构和非结构控制岩体分类系统。为评估这些斜坡的稳定性,本研究在进行运动学分析的同时,还采用了地质强度指数 (GSI)、岩体等级 (RMR)、连续斜坡岩体等级 (CoSMR)、斜坡岩体等级 (SMR) 和 Q 斜坡。其中,SMR 表明三个斜坡完全不稳定,而 CoSMR 表明四个斜坡完全不稳定。在动态和静态条件下,还使用斜坡稳定性等级(SSR)设计图分析了所有斜坡的稳定性,安全系数(FoS)分别为 1.2 和 1。Q-斜坡的破坏概率(PoF)为 1%,因此有两个斜坡为稳定斜坡。稳定斜坡角是根据 Q 斜坡安全角公式和安全系 数设计图确定的。不同经验分类给出的数值范围分别为 RMR(37-74)、GSI(27.3-58.5)、SMR(11-59)和 CoSMR(3.39-74.56)。在 RMR & SSR 和 RMR & GSI 之间发现了良好的关系,相关系数(R2)分别为 0.815 和 0.6866。最后,根据上述分类对所有这些斜坡的稳定性进行了比较,以确定该道路沿线最危险的斜坡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of slope stability through rock mass classification and kinematic analysis of some major slopes along NH-1A from Ramban to Banihal, North Western Himalayas

The network of Himalayan roadways and highways connects some remote regions of valleys or hill slopes, which is vital for India's socio-economic growth. Due to natural and artificial factors, frequency of slope instabilities along the networks has been increasing over last few decades. Assessment of stability of natural and artificial slopes due to construction of these connecting road networks is significant in safely executing these roads throughout the year. Several rock mass classification methods are generally used to assess the strength and deformability of rock mass. This study assesses slope stability along the NH-1A of Ramban district of North Western Himalayas. Various structurally and non-structurally controlled rock mass classification systems have been applied to assess the stability conditions of 14 slopes. For evaluating the stability of these slopes, kinematic analysis was performed along with geological strength index (GSI), rock mass rating (RMR), continuous slope mass rating (CoSMR), slope mass rating (SMR), and Q-slope in the present study. The SMR gives three slopes as completely unstable while CoSMR suggests four slopes as completely unstable. The stability of all slopes was also analyzed using a design chart under dynamic and static conditions by slope stability rating (SSR) for the factor of safety (FoS) of 1.2 and 1 respectively. Q-slope with probability of failure (PoF) 1% gives two slopes as stable slopes. Stable slope angle has been determined based on the Q-slope safe angle equation and SSR design chart based on the FoS. The value ranges given by different empirical classifications were RMR (37–74), GSI (27.3–58.5), SMR (11–59), and CoSMR (3.39–74.56). Good relationship was found among RMR & SSR and RMR & GSI with correlation coefficient (R2) value of 0.815 and 0.6866, respectively. Lastly, a comparative stability of all these slopes based on the above classification has been performed to identify the most critical slope along this road.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
227
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (JRMGE), overseen by the Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, is dedicated to the latest advancements in rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It serves as a platform for global scholars to stay updated on developments in various related fields including soil mechanics, foundation engineering, civil engineering, mining engineering, hydraulic engineering, petroleum engineering, and engineering geology. With a focus on fostering international academic exchange, JRMGE acts as a conduit between theoretical advancements and practical applications. Topics covered include new theories, technologies, methods, experiences, in-situ and laboratory tests, developments, case studies, and timely reviews within the realm of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信