{"title":"基于岩体分类和运动学分析的NH-1A沿线Ramban - Banihal主要边坡稳定性评价","authors":"Amit Jaiswal, A.K. Verma, T.N. Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The network of Himalayan roadways and highways connects some remote regions of valleys or hill slopes, which is vital for India's socio-economic growth. Due to natural and artificial factors, frequency of slope instabilities along the networks has been increasing over last few decades. Assessment of stability of natural and artificial slopes due to construction of these connecting road networks is significant in safely executing these roads throughout the year. Several rock mass classification methods are generally used to assess the strength and deformability of rock mass. This study assesses slope stability along the NH-1A of Ramban district of North Western Himalayas. Various structurally and non-structurally controlled rock mass classification systems have been applied to assess the stability conditions of 14 slopes. For evaluating the stability of these slopes, kinematic analysis was performed along with geological strength index (GSI), rock mass rating (RMR), continuous slope mass rating (CoSMR), slope mass rating (SMR), and Q-slope in the present study. The SMR gives three slopes as completely unstable while CoSMR suggests four slopes as completely unstable. The stability of all slopes was also analyzed using a design chart under dynamic and static conditions by slope stability rating (SSR) for the factor of safety (FoS) of 1.2 and 1 respectively. Q-slope with probability of failure (PoF) 1% gives two slopes as stable slopes. Stable slope angle has been determined based on the Q-slope safe angle equation and SSR design chart based on the FoS. The value ranges given by different empirical classifications were RMR (37–74), GSI (27.3–58.5), SMR (11–59), and CoSMR (3.39–74.56). Good relationship was found among RMR & SSR and RMR & GSI with correlation coefficient (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup>) value of 0.815 and 0.6866, respectively. Lastly, a comparative stability of all these slopes based on the above classification has been performed to identify the most critical slope along this road.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 167-182"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523000902/pdfft?md5=a40b98600511abfdf0ac749240a5d011&pid=1-s2.0-S1674775523000902-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of slope stability through rock mass classification and kinematic analysis of some major slopes along NH-1A from Ramban to Banihal, North Western Himalayas\",\"authors\":\"Amit Jaiswal, A.K. Verma, T.N. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.02.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The network of Himalayan roadways and highways connects some remote regions of valleys or hill slopes, which is vital for India's socio-economic growth. Due to natural and artificial factors, frequency of slope instabilities along the networks has been increasing over last few decades. Assessment of stability of natural and artificial slopes due to construction of these connecting road networks is significant in safely executing these roads throughout the year. Several rock mass classification methods are generally used to assess the strength and deformability of rock mass. This study assesses slope stability along the NH-1A of Ramban district of North Western Himalayas. Various structurally and non-structurally controlled rock mass classification systems have been applied to assess the stability conditions of 14 slopes. For evaluating the stability of these slopes, kinematic analysis was performed along with geological strength index (GSI), rock mass rating (RMR), continuous slope mass rating (CoSMR), slope mass rating (SMR), and Q-slope in the present study. The SMR gives three slopes as completely unstable while CoSMR suggests four slopes as completely unstable. The stability of all slopes was also analyzed using a design chart under dynamic and static conditions by slope stability rating (SSR) for the factor of safety (FoS) of 1.2 and 1 respectively. Q-slope with probability of failure (PoF) 1% gives two slopes as stable slopes. Stable slope angle has been determined based on the Q-slope safe angle equation and SSR design chart based on the FoS. The value ranges given by different empirical classifications were RMR (37–74), GSI (27.3–58.5), SMR (11–59), and CoSMR (3.39–74.56). Good relationship was found among RMR & SSR and RMR & GSI with correlation coefficient (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup>) value of 0.815 and 0.6866, respectively. Lastly, a comparative stability of all these slopes based on the above classification has been performed to identify the most critical slope along this road.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 167-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523000902/pdfft?md5=a40b98600511abfdf0ac749240a5d011&pid=1-s2.0-S1674775523000902-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523000902\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523000902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of slope stability through rock mass classification and kinematic analysis of some major slopes along NH-1A from Ramban to Banihal, North Western Himalayas
The network of Himalayan roadways and highways connects some remote regions of valleys or hill slopes, which is vital for India's socio-economic growth. Due to natural and artificial factors, frequency of slope instabilities along the networks has been increasing over last few decades. Assessment of stability of natural and artificial slopes due to construction of these connecting road networks is significant in safely executing these roads throughout the year. Several rock mass classification methods are generally used to assess the strength and deformability of rock mass. This study assesses slope stability along the NH-1A of Ramban district of North Western Himalayas. Various structurally and non-structurally controlled rock mass classification systems have been applied to assess the stability conditions of 14 slopes. For evaluating the stability of these slopes, kinematic analysis was performed along with geological strength index (GSI), rock mass rating (RMR), continuous slope mass rating (CoSMR), slope mass rating (SMR), and Q-slope in the present study. The SMR gives three slopes as completely unstable while CoSMR suggests four slopes as completely unstable. The stability of all slopes was also analyzed using a design chart under dynamic and static conditions by slope stability rating (SSR) for the factor of safety (FoS) of 1.2 and 1 respectively. Q-slope with probability of failure (PoF) 1% gives two slopes as stable slopes. Stable slope angle has been determined based on the Q-slope safe angle equation and SSR design chart based on the FoS. The value ranges given by different empirical classifications were RMR (37–74), GSI (27.3–58.5), SMR (11–59), and CoSMR (3.39–74.56). Good relationship was found among RMR & SSR and RMR & GSI with correlation coefficient (R2) value of 0.815 and 0.6866, respectively. Lastly, a comparative stability of all these slopes based on the above classification has been performed to identify the most critical slope along this road.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (JRMGE), overseen by the Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, is dedicated to the latest advancements in rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It serves as a platform for global scholars to stay updated on developments in various related fields including soil mechanics, foundation engineering, civil engineering, mining engineering, hydraulic engineering, petroleum engineering, and engineering geology. With a focus on fostering international academic exchange, JRMGE acts as a conduit between theoretical advancements and practical applications. Topics covered include new theories, technologies, methods, experiences, in-situ and laboratory tests, developments, case studies, and timely reviews within the realm of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering.