表达性写作中的情感参与

IF 0.9 4区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Daphna Sabo Mordechay, Z. Eviatar, Bracha Nir
{"title":"表达性写作中的情感参与","authors":"Daphna Sabo Mordechay, Z. Eviatar, Bracha Nir","doi":"10.1075/NI.20051.SAB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n HaCohen et al. (2018) identified three types of narratives that emerge\n in the context of integrating a difficult event into one’s life story. We use their identification while focusing on the quality\n of emotional involvement evidenced in texts, and combining it with an abstract-content text analysis. This allows us to quantify\n emotional engagement in Expressive Writing (EW) texts. We analyze personal-experience narratives produced in EW, and examine\n whether good EW outcome cases (in terms of well-being improvement) would be characterized with different types of narratives than\n poor outcome cases. Results show that texts produced by good outcome cases presented more emotional involvement than poor cases.\n Furthermore, good cases presented with a more complex and well-integrated narrative of their story than poor cases. It is\n suggested that good outcome participants’ writings are more emotionally involved, integrated and personal. Our findings emphasize\n the importance of context-sensitive and function-oriented accounts of EW texts.","PeriodicalId":46671,"journal":{"name":"Narrative Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional engagement in expressive writing\",\"authors\":\"Daphna Sabo Mordechay, Z. Eviatar, Bracha Nir\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/NI.20051.SAB\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n HaCohen et al. (2018) identified three types of narratives that emerge\\n in the context of integrating a difficult event into one’s life story. We use their identification while focusing on the quality\\n of emotional involvement evidenced in texts, and combining it with an abstract-content text analysis. This allows us to quantify\\n emotional engagement in Expressive Writing (EW) texts. We analyze personal-experience narratives produced in EW, and examine\\n whether good EW outcome cases (in terms of well-being improvement) would be characterized with different types of narratives than\\n poor outcome cases. Results show that texts produced by good outcome cases presented more emotional involvement than poor cases.\\n Furthermore, good cases presented with a more complex and well-integrated narrative of their story than poor cases. It is\\n suggested that good outcome participants’ writings are more emotionally involved, integrated and personal. Our findings emphasize\\n the importance of context-sensitive and function-oriented accounts of EW texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Narrative Inquiry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Narrative Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/NI.20051.SAB\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narrative Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/NI.20051.SAB","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

HaCohen等人。(2018)确定了在将一个困难事件融入一个人的生活故事的背景下出现的三种叙事类型。我们使用他们的识别,同时关注文本中所证明的情感参与的质量,并将其与抽象内容文本分析相结合。这使我们能够量化表达写作(EW)文本中的情感参与。我们分析了电子战中产生的个人经历叙事,并研究了良好的电子战结果案例(就幸福感改善而言)是否会与不良结果案例具有不同类型的叙事特征。结果表明,结果好的案例产生的文本比结果差的案例表现出更多的情感参与。此外,好的案例比坏的案例对故事的叙述更复杂、更完整。研究表明,良好结果参与者的写作更多地涉及情感、综合和个人化。我们的研究结果强调了对电子战文本进行上下文敏感和功能导向的描述的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotional engagement in expressive writing
HaCohen et al. (2018) identified three types of narratives that emerge in the context of integrating a difficult event into one’s life story. We use their identification while focusing on the quality of emotional involvement evidenced in texts, and combining it with an abstract-content text analysis. This allows us to quantify emotional engagement in Expressive Writing (EW) texts. We analyze personal-experience narratives produced in EW, and examine whether good EW outcome cases (in terms of well-being improvement) would be characterized with different types of narratives than poor outcome cases. Results show that texts produced by good outcome cases presented more emotional involvement than poor cases. Furthermore, good cases presented with a more complex and well-integrated narrative of their story than poor cases. It is suggested that good outcome participants’ writings are more emotionally involved, integrated and personal. Our findings emphasize the importance of context-sensitive and function-oriented accounts of EW texts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Narrative Inquiry
Narrative Inquiry Multiple-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Narrative Inquiry is devoted to providing a forum for theoretical, empirical, and methodological work on narrative. Articles appearing in Narrative Inquiry draw upon a variety of approaches and methodologies in the study of narrative as a way to give contour to experience, tradition, and values to next generations. Particular emphasis is placed on theoretical approaches to narrative and the analysis of narratives in human interaction, including those practiced by researchers in psychology, linguistics and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信