{"title":"透过媒体颠覆的表面:数字技术推动了新的商业逻辑、专业实践和企业家身份","authors":"Päivi Maijanen, Bjørn von Rimscha, M. Głowacki","doi":"10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital disruption has recently been one of the main focal points of media management scholars. Digitalisation is regarded as the main driver of change that results in enormous managerial and organisational challenges. As the evolutionary view of organisational change (Nelson & Winter, 1982; Winter, 2003) tells us, the best and perhaps only way to overcome path dependencies and rigidities that hamper change is to learn new competencies and capabilities and to explore new business models (e.g. Achtenhagen & Raviola, 2009; Doyle, 2015; Järventie-Thessleff, Moisander & Villi, 2014; Maijanen & Virta, 2017; Teece, 2018). Nevertheless, due to organisational inertia, high uncertainty and rapid changes in business environments these challenges still exist and prevail with the risk of causing competence traps and failures. This special issue of the Journal of Media Business Studies looks at the other side of the coin, asking how digital technologies boost change by creating new revenue models and initiating and enhancing new practices and logics in journalism andmedia entrepreneurship. New technology has created many stories of success, such as Netflix being one of the case examples of this special issue (see also Küng, 2015). This special issue features four papers that, in their early versions, were presented at the 2018 annual EuropeanMediaManagement and Association (emma) conference in Warsaw. The papers aim to look beyond the digital disruption on a more micro foundational level using different approaches and theoretical concepts. However, they all tackle the role of digital technology in enhancing and boosting changes in media. Anders Fagerjord from theUniversity of Bergen and Lucy Küng from the Reuters Institute at the University of Oxford provide an important contribution by analyzing the valuecreating process of streaming video services on the micro-level, drawing on Netflix as a case study. As the authors point out, “streaming services are a new and fast-growing element in media industry”. These services fundamentally change the habits of media users, which in turn changes the whole competitive environment. Based on company and industry reports as well as press accounts, the study provides a detailed analysis of the core actors and flows between the actors. The study shows the nature of these new complex organisations that the authors call “tech-media hybrids” combining characteristics of a network and platform and having a strong grounding on digital technology. The authors also call streaming video services the “new beasts” that are very reliant on external partners. In such hybrid organisations, data flows and analytics constitute a central source of competitive advantage. Juliane Lischka from the University of Zürich provides a fresh approach by applying the concept of institutional logics to her analysis of digital transformation. Following, e.g. Friedland and Alford (1991) and Thornton, Ocasio, and Lounsbury (2012), Lischka defines JOURNAL OF MEDIA BUSINESS STUDIES 2019, VOL. 16, NO. 3, 163–165 https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095","PeriodicalId":45673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Business Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"163 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the surface of media disruption: digital technology boosting new business logics, professional practices and entrepreneurial identities\",\"authors\":\"Päivi Maijanen, Bjørn von Rimscha, M. Głowacki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital disruption has recently been one of the main focal points of media management scholars. Digitalisation is regarded as the main driver of change that results in enormous managerial and organisational challenges. As the evolutionary view of organisational change (Nelson & Winter, 1982; Winter, 2003) tells us, the best and perhaps only way to overcome path dependencies and rigidities that hamper change is to learn new competencies and capabilities and to explore new business models (e.g. Achtenhagen & Raviola, 2009; Doyle, 2015; Järventie-Thessleff, Moisander & Villi, 2014; Maijanen & Virta, 2017; Teece, 2018). Nevertheless, due to organisational inertia, high uncertainty and rapid changes in business environments these challenges still exist and prevail with the risk of causing competence traps and failures. This special issue of the Journal of Media Business Studies looks at the other side of the coin, asking how digital technologies boost change by creating new revenue models and initiating and enhancing new practices and logics in journalism andmedia entrepreneurship. New technology has created many stories of success, such as Netflix being one of the case examples of this special issue (see also Küng, 2015). This special issue features four papers that, in their early versions, were presented at the 2018 annual EuropeanMediaManagement and Association (emma) conference in Warsaw. The papers aim to look beyond the digital disruption on a more micro foundational level using different approaches and theoretical concepts. However, they all tackle the role of digital technology in enhancing and boosting changes in media. Anders Fagerjord from theUniversity of Bergen and Lucy Küng from the Reuters Institute at the University of Oxford provide an important contribution by analyzing the valuecreating process of streaming video services on the micro-level, drawing on Netflix as a case study. As the authors point out, “streaming services are a new and fast-growing element in media industry”. These services fundamentally change the habits of media users, which in turn changes the whole competitive environment. Based on company and industry reports as well as press accounts, the study provides a detailed analysis of the core actors and flows between the actors. The study shows the nature of these new complex organisations that the authors call “tech-media hybrids” combining characteristics of a network and platform and having a strong grounding on digital technology. The authors also call streaming video services the “new beasts” that are very reliant on external partners. In such hybrid organisations, data flows and analytics constitute a central source of competitive advantage. Juliane Lischka from the University of Zürich provides a fresh approach by applying the concept of institutional logics to her analysis of digital transformation. Following, e.g. Friedland and Alford (1991) and Thornton, Ocasio, and Lounsbury (2012), Lischka defines JOURNAL OF MEDIA BUSINESS STUDIES 2019, VOL. 16, NO. 3, 163–165 https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095\",\"PeriodicalId\":45673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Media Business Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"163 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Media Business Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
数字颠覆最近成为媒体管理学者关注的焦点之一。数字化被视为变革的主要驱动力,带来了巨大的管理和组织挑战。作为组织变革的进化观(Nelson & Winter, 1982;Winter, 2003)告诉我们,克服阻碍变革的路径依赖和僵化的最好,也许也是唯一的方法是学习新的能力和能力,并探索新的商业模式(例如Achtenhagen & Raviola, 2009;柯南道尔,2015;Järventie-Thessleff, Moisander & Villi, 2014;Maijanen & Virta, 2017;蒂斯,2018)。然而,由于组织惯性,高度不确定性和商业环境的快速变化,这些挑战仍然存在,并普遍存在导致能力陷阱和失败的风险。本期《媒体商业研究杂志》特刊着眼于硬币的另一面,探讨数字技术如何通过创造新的收入模式、启动和加强新闻和媒体创业的新实践和新逻辑来推动变革。新技术创造了许多成功的故事,比如Netflix就是本期特刊的一个例子(另见k ng, 2015)。本期特刊收录了在华沙举行的2018年欧洲媒体管理和协会(emma)年度会议上发表的四篇早期论文。这些论文旨在利用不同的方法和理论概念,在更微观的基础层面上超越数字破坏。然而,他们都解决了数字技术在加强和推动媒体变革方面的作用。卑尔根大学的Anders Fagerjord和牛津大学路透研究所的Lucy k以Netflix为例,从微观层面分析了流媒体视频服务的价值创造过程,做出了重要贡献。正如作者所指出的,“流媒体服务是媒体行业中一个快速增长的新元素”。这些服务从根本上改变了媒体用户的习惯,从而改变了整个竞争环境。基于公司和行业报告以及新闻报道,本研究对核心参与者和参与者之间的流动进行了详细分析。这项研究显示了这些新的复杂组织的本质,作者将其称为“技术-媒体混合体”,结合了网络和平台的特征,并以数字技术为坚实基础。作者还将流媒体视频服务称为非常依赖外部合作伙伴的“新野兽”。在这种混合型组织中,数据流和分析构成了竞争优势的核心来源。来自苏黎世大学的Juliane Lischka通过将制度逻辑的概念应用于她对数字化转型的分析,提供了一种新的方法。继Friedland and Alford(1991)和Thornton, Ocasio, and Lounsbury(2012)之后,Lischka定义了《媒体商业研究杂志》(JOURNAL OF MEDIA BUSINESS STUDIES) 2019, VOL. 16, NO. 5)。3,163 - 165 https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095
Beyond the surface of media disruption: digital technology boosting new business logics, professional practices and entrepreneurial identities
Digital disruption has recently been one of the main focal points of media management scholars. Digitalisation is regarded as the main driver of change that results in enormous managerial and organisational challenges. As the evolutionary view of organisational change (Nelson & Winter, 1982; Winter, 2003) tells us, the best and perhaps only way to overcome path dependencies and rigidities that hamper change is to learn new competencies and capabilities and to explore new business models (e.g. Achtenhagen & Raviola, 2009; Doyle, 2015; Järventie-Thessleff, Moisander & Villi, 2014; Maijanen & Virta, 2017; Teece, 2018). Nevertheless, due to organisational inertia, high uncertainty and rapid changes in business environments these challenges still exist and prevail with the risk of causing competence traps and failures. This special issue of the Journal of Media Business Studies looks at the other side of the coin, asking how digital technologies boost change by creating new revenue models and initiating and enhancing new practices and logics in journalism andmedia entrepreneurship. New technology has created many stories of success, such as Netflix being one of the case examples of this special issue (see also Küng, 2015). This special issue features four papers that, in their early versions, were presented at the 2018 annual EuropeanMediaManagement and Association (emma) conference in Warsaw. The papers aim to look beyond the digital disruption on a more micro foundational level using different approaches and theoretical concepts. However, they all tackle the role of digital technology in enhancing and boosting changes in media. Anders Fagerjord from theUniversity of Bergen and Lucy Küng from the Reuters Institute at the University of Oxford provide an important contribution by analyzing the valuecreating process of streaming video services on the micro-level, drawing on Netflix as a case study. As the authors point out, “streaming services are a new and fast-growing element in media industry”. These services fundamentally change the habits of media users, which in turn changes the whole competitive environment. Based on company and industry reports as well as press accounts, the study provides a detailed analysis of the core actors and flows between the actors. The study shows the nature of these new complex organisations that the authors call “tech-media hybrids” combining characteristics of a network and platform and having a strong grounding on digital technology. The authors also call streaming video services the “new beasts” that are very reliant on external partners. In such hybrid organisations, data flows and analytics constitute a central source of competitive advantage. Juliane Lischka from the University of Zürich provides a fresh approach by applying the concept of institutional logics to her analysis of digital transformation. Following, e.g. Friedland and Alford (1991) and Thornton, Ocasio, and Lounsbury (2012), Lischka defines JOURNAL OF MEDIA BUSINESS STUDIES 2019, VOL. 16, NO. 3, 163–165 https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1700095