BDMS使用审查技术(BURT)的开发:一种利用泰语自然语言处理评估住院适当性的人工智能工具

Jinhatha Panyasorn, Piemchok Banomyong, Kusuma Phetchunsakul, Noppadol Phengpinit, Varut Wiseschinda, C. Kunanusont
{"title":"BDMS使用审查技术(BURT)的开发:一种利用泰语自然语言处理评估住院适当性的人工智能工具","authors":"Jinhatha Panyasorn, Piemchok Banomyong, Kusuma Phetchunsakul, Noppadol Phengpinit, Varut Wiseschinda, C. Kunanusont","doi":"10.31524/bkkmedj.2020.21.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: To develop an effective artificial intelligence (AI) driven platform to optimize the process of assessing appropriateness of hospitalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anonymized data of 22,020 insured-patient admissions in a BDMS network hospital were included to build a prediction model based on a comprehensive guideline for appropriate hospitalization. To develop Thai Natural Language Processing (NLP) model, 77,707 sentences from medical records were used and separated into two datasets, 80% for training and 20% for testing. A combined NLP and rule-based algorithms formed an AI engine and outputs were displayed using a web-based application. An expert panel of five Utilization Management (UM) physicians had several collaborative discussions to fine tune the NLP model, application of clinical criteria, and classification engine. Eventually, NLP model in the latest version (BURT1.1), had satisfactory features with overall higher than 99% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1. RESULTS: Performance of BURT1.1 was assessed using 300 cases randomly selected from the main dataset, against other methods, including concurrent review by UM nurses at the participating hospital, and UM nurses at Bangkok Hospital Headquarters (BHQ). Agreement upon UM Physician Panel consensus was set as one of the performance indicators, and BURT1.1 showed a favorable outcome with the highest rate of agreement (86%) among all the methods. The precision rate was 99% as compared to insurance claim approval status. Additionally, dramatic time savings were achieved with 0.59 second of processing time as compared to 10-15 minutes per case by conventional manual review. CONCLUSION: BURT1.1 should be effectively implemented as an automatic daily tool to screen inappropriate hospitalization. It can immediately identify patients at high risk of inappropriate hospitalization that require further assessment by UM nurse, thus providing feedback to attending physicians on the completeness and quality of documentation, with parallel notification to UM physicians. Ultimately, BURT1.1 can contribute to increase UM efficiency, speeding up the claim process, reducing health care costs due to unnecessary hospitalization, and reduction of claim denials.","PeriodicalId":92144,"journal":{"name":"The Bangkok medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of BDMS Utilization Review Technology (BURT): An Artificial Intelligence Tool Using Thai Natural Language Processing to Assess Appropriateness of Hospitalization\",\"authors\":\"Jinhatha Panyasorn, Piemchok Banomyong, Kusuma Phetchunsakul, Noppadol Phengpinit, Varut Wiseschinda, C. Kunanusont\",\"doi\":\"10.31524/bkkmedj.2020.21.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES: To develop an effective artificial intelligence (AI) driven platform to optimize the process of assessing appropriateness of hospitalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anonymized data of 22,020 insured-patient admissions in a BDMS network hospital were included to build a prediction model based on a comprehensive guideline for appropriate hospitalization. To develop Thai Natural Language Processing (NLP) model, 77,707 sentences from medical records were used and separated into two datasets, 80% for training and 20% for testing. A combined NLP and rule-based algorithms formed an AI engine and outputs were displayed using a web-based application. An expert panel of five Utilization Management (UM) physicians had several collaborative discussions to fine tune the NLP model, application of clinical criteria, and classification engine. Eventually, NLP model in the latest version (BURT1.1), had satisfactory features with overall higher than 99% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1. RESULTS: Performance of BURT1.1 was assessed using 300 cases randomly selected from the main dataset, against other methods, including concurrent review by UM nurses at the participating hospital, and UM nurses at Bangkok Hospital Headquarters (BHQ). Agreement upon UM Physician Panel consensus was set as one of the performance indicators, and BURT1.1 showed a favorable outcome with the highest rate of agreement (86%) among all the methods. The precision rate was 99% as compared to insurance claim approval status. Additionally, dramatic time savings were achieved with 0.59 second of processing time as compared to 10-15 minutes per case by conventional manual review. CONCLUSION: BURT1.1 should be effectively implemented as an automatic daily tool to screen inappropriate hospitalization. It can immediately identify patients at high risk of inappropriate hospitalization that require further assessment by UM nurse, thus providing feedback to attending physicians on the completeness and quality of documentation, with parallel notification to UM physicians. Ultimately, BURT1.1 can contribute to increase UM efficiency, speeding up the claim process, reducing health care costs due to unnecessary hospitalization, and reduction of claim denials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bangkok medical journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bangkok medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31524/bkkmedj.2020.21.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bangkok medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31524/bkkmedj.2020.21.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发一个有效的人工智能(AI)驱动平台,以优化住院适宜性评估过程。材料与方法:采用某BDMS网络医院22,020例参保入院患者的匿名数据,建立基于综合合理住院指南的预测模型。为了开发泰语自然语言处理(NLP)模型,使用了来自医疗记录的77707个句子,并将其分为两个数据集,80%用于训练,20%用于测试。自然语言处理和基于规则的算法相结合形成了一个人工智能引擎,并通过基于web的应用程序显示输出。一个由五名Utilization Management (UM)医生组成的专家小组进行了几次协作讨论,以微调NLP模型、临床标准的应用和分类引擎。最终,最新版本(BURT1.1)的NLP模型具有令人满意的特征,总体上准确率、精密度、召回率和F1均高于99%。结果:使用从主数据集中随机选择的300例病例对BURT1.1的绩效进行评估,并与其他方法进行比较,包括参与医院的UM护士和曼谷医院总部(BHQ)的UM护士同时进行评估。将UM医师小组共识的一致性作为绩效指标之一,BURT1.1显示出良好的结果,在所有方法中一致性率最高(86%)。与保险理赔批准状态相比,准确率为99%。此外,与传统的人工审查10-15分钟相比,处理时间缩短了0.59秒,节省了大量时间。结论:应有效实施BURT1.1作为日常自动筛查不适宜住院的工具。它可以立即识别需要UM护士进一步评估的高风险不适当住院患者,从而向主治医生提供关于文件完整性和质量的反馈,同时通知UM医生。最终,BURT1.1有助于提高UM效率,加快索赔流程,降低因不必要住院造成的医疗保健成本,并减少索赔拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of BDMS Utilization Review Technology (BURT): An Artificial Intelligence Tool Using Thai Natural Language Processing to Assess Appropriateness of Hospitalization
OBJECTIVES: To develop an effective artificial intelligence (AI) driven platform to optimize the process of assessing appropriateness of hospitalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anonymized data of 22,020 insured-patient admissions in a BDMS network hospital were included to build a prediction model based on a comprehensive guideline for appropriate hospitalization. To develop Thai Natural Language Processing (NLP) model, 77,707 sentences from medical records were used and separated into two datasets, 80% for training and 20% for testing. A combined NLP and rule-based algorithms formed an AI engine and outputs were displayed using a web-based application. An expert panel of five Utilization Management (UM) physicians had several collaborative discussions to fine tune the NLP model, application of clinical criteria, and classification engine. Eventually, NLP model in the latest version (BURT1.1), had satisfactory features with overall higher than 99% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1. RESULTS: Performance of BURT1.1 was assessed using 300 cases randomly selected from the main dataset, against other methods, including concurrent review by UM nurses at the participating hospital, and UM nurses at Bangkok Hospital Headquarters (BHQ). Agreement upon UM Physician Panel consensus was set as one of the performance indicators, and BURT1.1 showed a favorable outcome with the highest rate of agreement (86%) among all the methods. The precision rate was 99% as compared to insurance claim approval status. Additionally, dramatic time savings were achieved with 0.59 second of processing time as compared to 10-15 minutes per case by conventional manual review. CONCLUSION: BURT1.1 should be effectively implemented as an automatic daily tool to screen inappropriate hospitalization. It can immediately identify patients at high risk of inappropriate hospitalization that require further assessment by UM nurse, thus providing feedback to attending physicians on the completeness and quality of documentation, with parallel notification to UM physicians. Ultimately, BURT1.1 can contribute to increase UM efficiency, speeding up the claim process, reducing health care costs due to unnecessary hospitalization, and reduction of claim denials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信