使用联合分析方法确定贝宁农村农民对信贷类型的偏好及其市场结构

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
E. S. Sonehekpon, R. Fiamohe
{"title":"使用联合分析方法确定贝宁农村农民对信贷类型的偏好及其市场结构","authors":"E. S. Sonehekpon, R. Fiamohe","doi":"10.1108/afr-07-2022-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study analyzes farmers' preferences for agricultural credit and its market structure in rural Benin using the conjoint analysis approach.Design/methodology/approachThe data used come from primary sources collected from 228 randomly selected farmers. The conjoint analysis approach was used to produce the results. The bias associated with the heteroscedasticity of the error terms was fixed using the weighted least squares estimation method. Agricultural credit markets were segmented using the Calinski algorithm.FindingsThe study results reveal that farmers prefer a long-term agricultural credit with a low interest rate received via mobile banking. The interaction between a type of credit with collateral and a low interest rate is positively correlated with farmers' credit demand. The authors also found that agricultural credit markets are heterogeneous because of the heterogeneity in farmers' credit demand. This result has led to three different rural credit market segments identified in the selected study's sites. The market share simulation reveals a significant market share for the type of credit preferred by farmers in two segments.Research limitations/implicationsThe proven evidence from this study can guide the development of appropriate agricultural financial products that promote financial inclusion among farmers in rural Benin. More specifically, agricultural financial policies that promote digital long-term credit with low interest rate and appropriate guarantee mechanisms can promote financial inclusion among farmers and reduce the problem of asymmetric information in agricultural credit market. The study also calls for the promotion of differentiated policies across the three identified segments in order to positively impact the welfare of all farmers.Practical implicationsThe use of agricultural financial products that include digital long-term credit with low interest rate and appropriate guarantee mechanisms promote financial inclusion and reduce asymmetric information problems in agricultural credit markets in rural Benin.Social implicationsThe promotion of long-term digital and cheap credit improves farmers household's wellbeing in rural Benin.Originality/valueThis study contributes to a better understanding of the structure of rural credit markets. It also reveals the most preferred characteristics of rural credit profiles by farmers. Besides, it validates the importance of the use of guarantee as an appropriate mechanism which minimizes the problem of asymmetric information between financial agents and farmers.","PeriodicalId":46748,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Finance Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying farmers' preferences for types of credit and its market structure in rural Benin using the conjoint analysis approach\",\"authors\":\"E. S. Sonehekpon, R. Fiamohe\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/afr-07-2022-0081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study analyzes farmers' preferences for agricultural credit and its market structure in rural Benin using the conjoint analysis approach.Design/methodology/approachThe data used come from primary sources collected from 228 randomly selected farmers. The conjoint analysis approach was used to produce the results. The bias associated with the heteroscedasticity of the error terms was fixed using the weighted least squares estimation method. Agricultural credit markets were segmented using the Calinski algorithm.FindingsThe study results reveal that farmers prefer a long-term agricultural credit with a low interest rate received via mobile banking. The interaction between a type of credit with collateral and a low interest rate is positively correlated with farmers' credit demand. The authors also found that agricultural credit markets are heterogeneous because of the heterogeneity in farmers' credit demand. This result has led to three different rural credit market segments identified in the selected study's sites. The market share simulation reveals a significant market share for the type of credit preferred by farmers in two segments.Research limitations/implicationsThe proven evidence from this study can guide the development of appropriate agricultural financial products that promote financial inclusion among farmers in rural Benin. More specifically, agricultural financial policies that promote digital long-term credit with low interest rate and appropriate guarantee mechanisms can promote financial inclusion among farmers and reduce the problem of asymmetric information in agricultural credit market. The study also calls for the promotion of differentiated policies across the three identified segments in order to positively impact the welfare of all farmers.Practical implicationsThe use of agricultural financial products that include digital long-term credit with low interest rate and appropriate guarantee mechanisms promote financial inclusion and reduce asymmetric information problems in agricultural credit markets in rural Benin.Social implicationsThe promotion of long-term digital and cheap credit improves farmers household's wellbeing in rural Benin.Originality/valueThis study contributes to a better understanding of the structure of rural credit markets. It also reveals the most preferred characteristics of rural credit profiles by farmers. Besides, it validates the importance of the use of guarantee as an appropriate mechanism which minimizes the problem of asymmetric information between financial agents and farmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Finance Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Finance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/afr-07-2022-0081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Finance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/afr-07-2022-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的采用联合分析方法,分析贝宁农村农民对农业信贷的偏好及其市场结构。设计/方法/方法使用的数据来自随机抽取的228名农民的第一手资料。采用联合分析方法得出结果。采用加权最小二乘估计方法确定误差项异方差相关的偏差。采用Calinski算法对农业信贷市场进行了细分。研究结果显示,农民更喜欢通过手机银行获得长期、低利率的农业信贷。担保型信贷与低利率之间的交互作用与农民的信贷需求呈正相关。由于农民信贷需求的异质性,农业信贷市场存在异质性。这一结果导致在选定的研究地点确定了三种不同的农村信贷市场细分。市场份额模拟显示,在两个细分市场中,农民偏好的信贷类型占有显著的市场份额。研究局限性/启示本研究的实证可以指导开发适当的农业金融产品,促进贝宁农村农民的普惠金融。具体而言,推动低利率长期数字信贷和适当担保机制的农业金融政策可以促进农民普惠金融,减少农业信贷市场信息不对称问题。该研究还呼吁在三个确定的部分中促进差异化政策,以便对所有农民的福利产生积极影响。实际意义使用农业金融产品,包括低利率的数字长期信贷和适当的担保机制,促进了金融普惠,减少了贝宁农村农业信贷市场的信息不对称问题。社会影响促进长期数字和廉价信贷改善了贝宁农村农民家庭的福祉。原创性/价值本研究有助于更好地理解农村信贷市场结构。它还揭示了农民最喜欢的农村信贷特征。此外,它验证了使用担保作为一种适当机制的重要性,它可以最大限度地减少金融代理与农民之间的信息不对称问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying farmers' preferences for types of credit and its market structure in rural Benin using the conjoint analysis approach
PurposeThis study analyzes farmers' preferences for agricultural credit and its market structure in rural Benin using the conjoint analysis approach.Design/methodology/approachThe data used come from primary sources collected from 228 randomly selected farmers. The conjoint analysis approach was used to produce the results. The bias associated with the heteroscedasticity of the error terms was fixed using the weighted least squares estimation method. Agricultural credit markets were segmented using the Calinski algorithm.FindingsThe study results reveal that farmers prefer a long-term agricultural credit with a low interest rate received via mobile banking. The interaction between a type of credit with collateral and a low interest rate is positively correlated with farmers' credit demand. The authors also found that agricultural credit markets are heterogeneous because of the heterogeneity in farmers' credit demand. This result has led to three different rural credit market segments identified in the selected study's sites. The market share simulation reveals a significant market share for the type of credit preferred by farmers in two segments.Research limitations/implicationsThe proven evidence from this study can guide the development of appropriate agricultural financial products that promote financial inclusion among farmers in rural Benin. More specifically, agricultural financial policies that promote digital long-term credit with low interest rate and appropriate guarantee mechanisms can promote financial inclusion among farmers and reduce the problem of asymmetric information in agricultural credit market. The study also calls for the promotion of differentiated policies across the three identified segments in order to positively impact the welfare of all farmers.Practical implicationsThe use of agricultural financial products that include digital long-term credit with low interest rate and appropriate guarantee mechanisms promote financial inclusion and reduce asymmetric information problems in agricultural credit markets in rural Benin.Social implicationsThe promotion of long-term digital and cheap credit improves farmers household's wellbeing in rural Benin.Originality/valueThis study contributes to a better understanding of the structure of rural credit markets. It also reveals the most preferred characteristics of rural credit profiles by farmers. Besides, it validates the importance of the use of guarantee as an appropriate mechanism which minimizes the problem of asymmetric information between financial agents and farmers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Finance Review
Agricultural Finance Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Agricultural Finance Review provides a rigorous forum for the publication of theory and empirical work related solely to issues in agricultural and agribusiness finance. Contributions come from academic and industry experts across the world and address a wide range of topics including: Agricultural finance, Agricultural policy related to agricultural finance and risk issues, Agricultural lending and credit issues, Farm credit, Businesses and financial risks affecting agriculture and agribusiness, Agricultural policies affecting farm or agribusiness risks and profitability, Risk management strategies including the use of futures and options, Rural credit in developing economies, Microfinance and microcredit applied to agriculture and rural development, Financial efficiency, Agriculture insurance and reinsurance. Agricultural Finance Review is committed to research addressing (1) factors affecting or influencing the financing of agriculture and agribusiness in both developed and developing nations; (2) the broadest aspect of risk assessment and risk management strategies affecting agriculture; and (3) government policies affecting farm profitability, liquidity, and access to credit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信