骑栅栏

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Ginevra Courtade
{"title":"骑栅栏","authors":"Ginevra Courtade","doi":"10.1177/8756870520952566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this third issue of Volume 39, we are pleased to present four research reports and a program description from colleagues across the country. In the first article, Pindiprolu and Marks provide the results of an exploratory study examining the effects of two parent-implemented computer-based programs on the reading skills of students at-risk of reading failure during a summer break, as well as a description of parental and student perceptions regarding the effectiveness and desirability of the programs. The results suggest that both programs facilitated gains in phonemic awareness and phonics. The authors provide a description of the computer programs, results, implications, and limitations of the study. Next, DiMartino and Schultz provide the results of a study focused on stakeholders’ perceptions of device use in eighth grade cohort in a rural school, differences between device use by students with and without disabilities, and an awareness of student screen time exposure and its potential consequences. The authors used qualitative methods to assess student, teacher, and parent perceptions of screen time use and perceptions of the recommended daily allowance of screen time. Findings suggest that students, parents, and teachers perceive screen time as “excessive.” The authors offer implications for practice and future inquiry. Diamond, Demchak, and Abernathy sought to understand current rural school principals’ perceptions regarding various factors impacting the selection of teacher candidates. The authors used data collected from an online, crosssectional survey to investigate these perceptions. Results indicate that rural principals prefer to hire applicants who have completed a traditional 4-year college/university preparation program; look for specific factors such as experience, those who are known in the community, cooperating/ lead teacher evaluations, and areas of licenses held among teacher candidates; and report a preference toward hiring applicants who hold a dual license in elementary and special education. Implications for practice and suggestions for future research are also discussed. The final research report is delivered by Furno, Demchak, and Bingham. In this piece, the authors describe the results of a multiple probe across participant design used to examine the effects of sound-field amplification (SFA) use for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional diagnosed conditions enrolled in preschool, first, and second grade in a rural district. All participants demonstrated improved attending behaviors and compliance to directions with SFA with the focus on children who are DHH, with additional diagnoses showing stronger results than their hearing peers. Teachers indicated SFA was beneficial to the children who are DHH and they would use it again. The authors describe SFA as an effective strategy to improve access to educational opportunities by increasing attending behaviors and promoting participation for children who are DHH with other diagnoses. Implications for practice and future research are also discussed. The final article in this issue focuses on supporting preservice special education teachers in rural areas to incorporate self-determination skills (e.g., self-regulation) into student learning. Rivera, McKissick, and Adams provide a description of how a special education department sought to assist preservice special educators in embedding selfregulatory behaviors within lesson plans to better promote self-determination for their students in rural communities. The authors describe the development of a self-regulation plan/checklist, how to embed self-monitoring into a lesson plan, and preliminary results of the change in programming for preservice teachers. I would like to thank all of the authors who contributed to Volume 39, Issue 3 of Rural Special Education Quarterly. I hope you enjoy this new issue and will be able to use some of the ideas in your own community of practice. As we begin another school year and semester in the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic, I wish each of you good health and safety as you begin to teach. Look forward to an upcoming issue about supporting educators during COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":45133,"journal":{"name":"Rural Special Education Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/8756870520952566","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Riding Fences\",\"authors\":\"Ginevra Courtade\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/8756870520952566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this third issue of Volume 39, we are pleased to present four research reports and a program description from colleagues across the country. In the first article, Pindiprolu and Marks provide the results of an exploratory study examining the effects of two parent-implemented computer-based programs on the reading skills of students at-risk of reading failure during a summer break, as well as a description of parental and student perceptions regarding the effectiveness and desirability of the programs. The results suggest that both programs facilitated gains in phonemic awareness and phonics. The authors provide a description of the computer programs, results, implications, and limitations of the study. Next, DiMartino and Schultz provide the results of a study focused on stakeholders’ perceptions of device use in eighth grade cohort in a rural school, differences between device use by students with and without disabilities, and an awareness of student screen time exposure and its potential consequences. The authors used qualitative methods to assess student, teacher, and parent perceptions of screen time use and perceptions of the recommended daily allowance of screen time. Findings suggest that students, parents, and teachers perceive screen time as “excessive.” The authors offer implications for practice and future inquiry. Diamond, Demchak, and Abernathy sought to understand current rural school principals’ perceptions regarding various factors impacting the selection of teacher candidates. The authors used data collected from an online, crosssectional survey to investigate these perceptions. Results indicate that rural principals prefer to hire applicants who have completed a traditional 4-year college/university preparation program; look for specific factors such as experience, those who are known in the community, cooperating/ lead teacher evaluations, and areas of licenses held among teacher candidates; and report a preference toward hiring applicants who hold a dual license in elementary and special education. Implications for practice and suggestions for future research are also discussed. The final research report is delivered by Furno, Demchak, and Bingham. In this piece, the authors describe the results of a multiple probe across participant design used to examine the effects of sound-field amplification (SFA) use for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional diagnosed conditions enrolled in preschool, first, and second grade in a rural district. All participants demonstrated improved attending behaviors and compliance to directions with SFA with the focus on children who are DHH, with additional diagnoses showing stronger results than their hearing peers. Teachers indicated SFA was beneficial to the children who are DHH and they would use it again. The authors describe SFA as an effective strategy to improve access to educational opportunities by increasing attending behaviors and promoting participation for children who are DHH with other diagnoses. Implications for practice and future research are also discussed. The final article in this issue focuses on supporting preservice special education teachers in rural areas to incorporate self-determination skills (e.g., self-regulation) into student learning. Rivera, McKissick, and Adams provide a description of how a special education department sought to assist preservice special educators in embedding selfregulatory behaviors within lesson plans to better promote self-determination for their students in rural communities. The authors describe the development of a self-regulation plan/checklist, how to embed self-monitoring into a lesson plan, and preliminary results of the change in programming for preservice teachers. I would like to thank all of the authors who contributed to Volume 39, Issue 3 of Rural Special Education Quarterly. I hope you enjoy this new issue and will be able to use some of the ideas in your own community of practice. As we begin another school year and semester in the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic, I wish each of you good health and safety as you begin to teach. Look forward to an upcoming issue about supporting educators during COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural Special Education Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/8756870520952566\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural Special Education Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520952566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural Special Education Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520952566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第39卷的第三期中,我们很高兴介绍四份来自全国各地同事的研究报告和一份项目描述。在第一篇文章中,Pindiprolu和Marks提供了一项探索性研究的结果,该研究考察了双亲实施的基于计算机的课程对暑假期间有阅读失败风险的学生的阅读技能的影响,并描述了家长和学生对课程有效性和可取性的看法。研究结果表明,这两个项目都促进了音位意识和语音的提高。作者介绍了计算机程序、研究结果、意义和研究局限性。接下来,DiMartino和Schultz提供了一项研究的结果,该研究侧重于利益相关者对农村学校八年级学生使用设备的看法,残疾学生和非残疾学生使用设备之间的差异,以及对学生屏幕时间暴露及其潜在后果的认识。作者使用定性方法来评估学生、教师和家长对屏幕时间使用的看法以及对建议的每日屏幕时间的看法。研究结果表明,学生、家长和老师认为屏幕时间“过多”。作者为实践和未来的探究提供了启示。Diamond、Demchak和Abernathy试图了解当前农村学校校长对影响教师候选人选择的各种因素的看法。作者使用从一项在线横断面调查中收集的数据来调查这些看法。结果表明,农村校长更喜欢聘用完成传统的4年制大学预科课程的申请人;寻找具体因素,如经验、社区知名人士、合作/领导教师评估以及教师候选人的执照领域;并报告说,他们更倾向于雇用拥有小学和特殊教育双重许可证的申请人。对实践的启示和对未来研究的建议也进行了讨论。最终研究报告由Furno、Demchak和Bingham提供。在这篇文章中,作者描述了一项跨参与者设计的多探针研究的结果,该研究用于检查声场放大(SFA)对农村地区学前、一年级和二年级入学的聋哑或重听(DHH)儿童的影响。所有参与者都表现出改善的参与行为和对SFA指示的遵守,重点关注DHH儿童,其他诊断显示出比听力正常的同龄人更强的结果。老师们表示,SFA对DHH儿童有益,他们会再次使用它。作者将SFA描述为一种有效的策略,通过增加参与行为和促进患有其他诊断的DHH儿童的参与,来改善获得教育机会的机会。还讨论了对实践和未来研究的启示。本期的最后一篇文章侧重于支持农村地区的职前特殊教育教师将自决技能(如自我调节)纳入学生学习。Rivera、McKissick和Adams描述了一个特殊教育部门如何帮助职前特殊教育工作者在课程计划中嵌入自律行为,以更好地促进农村社区学生的自决。作者描述了自我监管计划/检查表的制定,如何将自我监管纳入课程计划,以及职前教师课程设置变化的初步结果。我要感谢所有为《农村特殊教育季刊》第39卷第3期撰稿的作者。我希望你喜欢这个新问题,并能够在你自己的实践社区中使用一些想法。当我们在新冠肺炎大流行的阵痛中开始新的学年和学期时,我祝愿你们每个人在开始教学时身体健康和安全。期待即将发布的关于在新冠肺炎期间支持教育工作者的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Riding Fences
In this third issue of Volume 39, we are pleased to present four research reports and a program description from colleagues across the country. In the first article, Pindiprolu and Marks provide the results of an exploratory study examining the effects of two parent-implemented computer-based programs on the reading skills of students at-risk of reading failure during a summer break, as well as a description of parental and student perceptions regarding the effectiveness and desirability of the programs. The results suggest that both programs facilitated gains in phonemic awareness and phonics. The authors provide a description of the computer programs, results, implications, and limitations of the study. Next, DiMartino and Schultz provide the results of a study focused on stakeholders’ perceptions of device use in eighth grade cohort in a rural school, differences between device use by students with and without disabilities, and an awareness of student screen time exposure and its potential consequences. The authors used qualitative methods to assess student, teacher, and parent perceptions of screen time use and perceptions of the recommended daily allowance of screen time. Findings suggest that students, parents, and teachers perceive screen time as “excessive.” The authors offer implications for practice and future inquiry. Diamond, Demchak, and Abernathy sought to understand current rural school principals’ perceptions regarding various factors impacting the selection of teacher candidates. The authors used data collected from an online, crosssectional survey to investigate these perceptions. Results indicate that rural principals prefer to hire applicants who have completed a traditional 4-year college/university preparation program; look for specific factors such as experience, those who are known in the community, cooperating/ lead teacher evaluations, and areas of licenses held among teacher candidates; and report a preference toward hiring applicants who hold a dual license in elementary and special education. Implications for practice and suggestions for future research are also discussed. The final research report is delivered by Furno, Demchak, and Bingham. In this piece, the authors describe the results of a multiple probe across participant design used to examine the effects of sound-field amplification (SFA) use for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional diagnosed conditions enrolled in preschool, first, and second grade in a rural district. All participants demonstrated improved attending behaviors and compliance to directions with SFA with the focus on children who are DHH, with additional diagnoses showing stronger results than their hearing peers. Teachers indicated SFA was beneficial to the children who are DHH and they would use it again. The authors describe SFA as an effective strategy to improve access to educational opportunities by increasing attending behaviors and promoting participation for children who are DHH with other diagnoses. Implications for practice and future research are also discussed. The final article in this issue focuses on supporting preservice special education teachers in rural areas to incorporate self-determination skills (e.g., self-regulation) into student learning. Rivera, McKissick, and Adams provide a description of how a special education department sought to assist preservice special educators in embedding selfregulatory behaviors within lesson plans to better promote self-determination for their students in rural communities. The authors describe the development of a self-regulation plan/checklist, how to embed self-monitoring into a lesson plan, and preliminary results of the change in programming for preservice teachers. I would like to thank all of the authors who contributed to Volume 39, Issue 3 of Rural Special Education Quarterly. I hope you enjoy this new issue and will be able to use some of the ideas in your own community of practice. As we begin another school year and semester in the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic, I wish each of you good health and safety as you begin to teach. Look forward to an upcoming issue about supporting educators during COVID-19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural Special Education Quarterly
Rural Special Education Quarterly EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信