手术体积描记指数指导下腰椎手术术中镇痛需求的比较研究

Sujit Kshirsagar, Pallavi Butiyani, Adnanali Sarkar, Geetanjali Dangat, Lisa Prakash, G. Girishkumar, Prathmesh Raut
{"title":"手术体积描记指数指导下腰椎手术术中镇痛需求的比较研究","authors":"Sujit Kshirsagar, Pallavi Butiyani, Adnanali Sarkar, Geetanjali Dangat, Lisa Prakash, G. Girishkumar, Prathmesh Raut","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_42_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The surgical plethysmographic index (SPI) has been introduced as a measure of the balance between nociception and anti-nociception. The SPI is proposed for the titration of intraoperative analgesic drugs during general anesthesia. Aims: This study aimed to compare the requirement of intraoperative analgesic consumption between SPI-guided analgesia and conventional analgesia practices, requirement of rescue analgesics and to study recovery time. Subjects and Methods: In this double-blind, randomized control study, 64 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were randomly divided into SPI-guided analgesia group (SPI) and conventional practice group (control). In the SPI group, patients received injection fentanyl bolus of 0.5 μg/kg whenever SPI value increased above 50. While in the conventional group, injection fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg was administered according to conventional clinical practice. Statistical Analysis Used: The statistical significance of difference of various categorical variables across two groups was tested using the Chi-square test. For assessing intergroup statistical significance of difference of various continuous measurements, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Intraoperative fentanyl requirement was 119.53 ± 16.48 μg in the conventional group and 142.97 ± 24.78 μg in SPI-guided group (P < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant. The mean recovery time in conventional group was 13.03 ± 1.03 min, and for SPI group, it was 13.53 ± 1.14 min (P > 0.05). Conclusions: We can conclude that SPI guidance may not always help in decreasing the dose of intraoperative opioid consumption. It should be used in combination with hemodynamic parameters. SPI guidance may not affect recovery time.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"81 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative analgesic requirement using surgical plethysmographic index guidance in lumbar spine surgeries: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Sujit Kshirsagar, Pallavi Butiyani, Adnanali Sarkar, Geetanjali Dangat, Lisa Prakash, G. Girishkumar, Prathmesh Raut\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_42_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: The surgical plethysmographic index (SPI) has been introduced as a measure of the balance between nociception and anti-nociception. The SPI is proposed for the titration of intraoperative analgesic drugs during general anesthesia. Aims: This study aimed to compare the requirement of intraoperative analgesic consumption between SPI-guided analgesia and conventional analgesia practices, requirement of rescue analgesics and to study recovery time. Subjects and Methods: In this double-blind, randomized control study, 64 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were randomly divided into SPI-guided analgesia group (SPI) and conventional practice group (control). In the SPI group, patients received injection fentanyl bolus of 0.5 μg/kg whenever SPI value increased above 50. While in the conventional group, injection fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg was administered according to conventional clinical practice. Statistical Analysis Used: The statistical significance of difference of various categorical variables across two groups was tested using the Chi-square test. For assessing intergroup statistical significance of difference of various continuous measurements, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Intraoperative fentanyl requirement was 119.53 ± 16.48 μg in the conventional group and 142.97 ± 24.78 μg in SPI-guided group (P < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant. The mean recovery time in conventional group was 13.03 ± 1.03 min, and for SPI group, it was 13.53 ± 1.14 min (P > 0.05). Conclusions: We can conclude that SPI guidance may not always help in decreasing the dose of intraoperative opioid consumption. It should be used in combination with hemodynamic parameters. SPI guidance may not affect recovery time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_42_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_42_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外科体积描记指数(SPI)已被引入作为伤害性和抗伤害性之间平衡的衡量标准。SPI用于全身麻醉期间术中镇痛药物的滴定。目的:本研究旨在比较SPI引导镇痛与常规镇痛方法对术中镇痛消耗的需求、对抢救性镇痛剂的需求以及研究恢复时间。受试者和方法:在这项双盲、随机对照研究中,64名腰椎手术患者被随机分为SPI指导镇痛组(SPI)和常规镇痛组(对照)。在SPI组中,每当SPI值增加到50以上时,患者就接受0.5μg/kg的芬太尼注射液。而在常规组中,根据常规临床实践,注射芬太尼0.5μg/kg。使用的统计分析:使用卡方检验来检验两组之间各种分类变量差异的统计学意义。为了评估各种连续测量差异的组间统计显著性,使用了独立样本t检验。结果:常规组术中芬太尼需求量为119.53±16.48μg,SPI引导组为142.97±24.78μg,差异有统计学意义。常规组的平均恢复时间为13.03±1.03min,SPI组为13.53±1.14min(P>0.05)。应结合血液动力学参数使用。SPI指导可能不会影响恢复时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative analgesic requirement using surgical plethysmographic index guidance in lumbar spine surgeries: A comparative study
Context: The surgical plethysmographic index (SPI) has been introduced as a measure of the balance between nociception and anti-nociception. The SPI is proposed for the titration of intraoperative analgesic drugs during general anesthesia. Aims: This study aimed to compare the requirement of intraoperative analgesic consumption between SPI-guided analgesia and conventional analgesia practices, requirement of rescue analgesics and to study recovery time. Subjects and Methods: In this double-blind, randomized control study, 64 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were randomly divided into SPI-guided analgesia group (SPI) and conventional practice group (control). In the SPI group, patients received injection fentanyl bolus of 0.5 μg/kg whenever SPI value increased above 50. While in the conventional group, injection fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg was administered according to conventional clinical practice. Statistical Analysis Used: The statistical significance of difference of various categorical variables across two groups was tested using the Chi-square test. For assessing intergroup statistical significance of difference of various continuous measurements, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Intraoperative fentanyl requirement was 119.53 ± 16.48 μg in the conventional group and 142.97 ± 24.78 μg in SPI-guided group (P < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant. The mean recovery time in conventional group was 13.03 ± 1.03 min, and for SPI group, it was 13.53 ± 1.14 min (P > 0.05). Conclusions: We can conclude that SPI guidance may not always help in decreasing the dose of intraoperative opioid consumption. It should be used in combination with hemodynamic parameters. SPI guidance may not affect recovery time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信