两种英国凯尔特语言形式的不同词源

IF 0.1 3区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Indogermanische Forschungen Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1515/if-2022-0002

Bernhard Bauer

{"title":"两种英国凯尔特语言形式的不同词源","authors":"Bernhard Bauer","doi":"10.1515/if-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper addresses the issues arising from the unexpected /x/ in the two British Celtic verbal forms: MW techaf ‘to retreat, flee’, MBret. techet ‘to flee’, and OW diguormechis ‘which he added’, OBret. degurmehim ‘adding/addition’. As will be shown in the discussion below, there is no need for assuming influence from the s-subjunctive nor the existence of an otherwise unattested secondary verb. It is argued here that the forms are intra-Celtic borrowings from Irish.","PeriodicalId":13385,"journal":{"name":"Indogermanische Forschungen","volume":"127 1","pages":"13 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative etymologies for two British Celtic verbal forms\",\"authors\":\"Bernhard Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/if-2022-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper addresses the issues arising from the unexpected /x/ in the two British Celtic verbal forms: MW techaf ‘to retreat, flee’, MBret. techet ‘to flee’, and OW diguormechis ‘which he added’, OBret. degurmehim ‘adding/addition’. As will be shown in the discussion below, there is no need for assuming influence from the s-subjunctive nor the existence of an otherwise unattested secondary verb. It is argued here that the forms are intra-Celtic borrowings from Irish.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indogermanische Forschungen\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"13 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indogermanische Forschungen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2022-0002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indogermanische Forschungen","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2022-0002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文讨论了在英属凯尔特语的两个动词形式:MW techaf (to retreat, escape)和MBret (MBret)中出现的意想不到的/x/所引起的问题。techet的意思是“逃离”，还有他加上的“odiuormechis”，OBret。degurmehim“添加/添加”。正如下面的讨论所显示的那样，没有必要假设s虚拟语气的影响，也没有必要假设存在一个未经证实的副动词。这里有人认为，这些形式是凯尔特内部从爱尔兰借来的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Alternative etymologies for two British Celtic verbal forms

Abstract This paper addresses the issues arising from the unexpected /x/ in the two British Celtic verbal forms: MW techaf ‘to retreat, flee’, MBret. techet ‘to flee’, and OW diguormechis ‘which he added’, OBret. degurmehim ‘adding/addition’. As will be shown in the discussion below, there is no need for assuming influence from the s-subjunctive nor the existence of an otherwise unattested secondary verb. It is argued here that the forms are intra-Celtic borrowings from Irish.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Indogermanische Forschungen Multiple-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Indogermanische Forschungen publishes contributions (essays and reviews) mainly in the areas of historical-comparative linguistics, historical linguistics, typology and characteristics of the languages of the Indogermanic language family. Essays on general linguistics and non-Indogermanic languages are also featured, provided that they coincide with the main focus of the journal with respect to methods and language history.