知识共和国的社交网络

Q2 Arts and Humanities

History of Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1086/721316

D. Miert

{"title":"知识共和国的社交网络","authors":"D. Miert","doi":"10.1086/721316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he past five or six years have witnessed the publication of numerous historical studies that draw on the method of network analysis. This essay seeks to explain why two books that emphatically reference “networking” in relation to a political entity (“empires” or “republic”) of learning do not use the quantitative and digital methods that have been drawing attention of historians of knowledge of late. Although quantitative network research has been around since the 1970s, the idea of a network in historical analysis received a new impulse due to the rise of the internet:","PeriodicalId":36904,"journal":{"name":"History of Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Networking in the Republic of Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"D. Miert\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"he past five or six years have witnessed the publication of numerous historical studies that draw on the method of network analysis. This essay seeks to explain why two books that emphatically reference “networking” in relation to a political entity (“empires” or “republic”) of learning do not use the quantitative and digital methods that have been drawing attention of historians of knowledge of late. Although quantitative network research has been around since the 1970s, the idea of a network in historical analysis received a new impulse due to the rise of the internet:\",\"PeriodicalId\":36904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Humanities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的五六年里，他发表了许多运用网络分析方法的历史研究。本文试图解释为什么两本书强调将“网络”与一个政治实体（“帝国”或“共和国”）的学习联系起来，却没有使用最近引起知识历史学家注意的定量和数字方法。尽管定量网络研究自20世纪70年代以来就一直存在，但由于互联网的兴起，历史分析中的网络概念受到了新的推动：

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Social Networking in the Republic of Knowledge

he past five or six years have witnessed the publication of numerous historical studies that draw on the method of network analysis. This essay seeks to explain why two books that emphatically reference “networking” in relation to a political entity (“empires” or “republic”) of learning do not use the quantitative and digital methods that have been drawing attention of historians of knowledge of late. Although quantitative network research has been around since the 1970s, the idea of a network in historical analysis received a new impulse due to the rise of the internet:

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

History of Humanities Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量