书评:多样性制度:为什么谈话不足以解决大学中的种族不平等

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Stephanie M. Ortiz
{"title":"书评:多样性制度:为什么谈话不足以解决大学中的种族不平等","authors":"Stephanie M. Ortiz","doi":"10.1177/00016993221104169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the firm, especially those with clients, either stymied or buttressed these new frameworks. Lastly, Chapter 5 reveals how external supports (e.g. paid staff and grandmothers) helped to ease the pressures of caregiving and further bolstered women’s performance at work. Accidental Feminism has three broad implications for research on social change, work, organizations, globalization, and feminism. First, Ballakrishnen reveals the interplay between local and global forces in a changing profession. The emergence of transnational ideals, like meritocracy, shaped local practices. A novel case of Indian professional firms with more equal outcomes than their counterparts in the United States reveals the importance of thinking globally. The focus also challenges the typical Western lens in U.S. academia. Ballakrishnen calls attention to the tendency in Western scholarship to assume that prosocial change only occurs in the majority White countries. This is especially clear in research on topics like diversity, inclusion, and equity. Second, the accidental nature of this gender-egalitarian change allows for fresh empirical and theoretical insights that have much to inform existing research on workplace inequality. Ballakrishnen reveals how organizational change with advantageous outcomes for workers, in this case women, can be unintentional, rather than the result of deliberate interventions, feminist or otherwise. Unfortunately, much like intentional feminist interventions at work (e.g. “Lean In” and D&I trainings), accidental forms of gender “equality” may build off of and exacerbate other forms of inequality. This brings us to the book’s third broad implication. By combining multiple levels of analysis, Ballakrishnen identifies how new forms of equality may rest on or reproduce other forms of inequality. In law in India, gender, class, and capital interact in the reproduction of inequality. The book thus poses the important question of whether gender parity is feminist: Are the outcomes “feminist” if other forms of intersecting inequalities are not alleviated? Ballakrishnen concludes by considering how the accidental can queer what it means to craft feminist change. Accidental Feminism will appeal to audiences interested in inequality, gender, feminism, class, diversity, inclusion, work, professional services, globalization, and organizational and institutional change. Ballakrishnen has crafted a well-designed study with meticulous analysis, keen insights, and a compelling argument that will inform academic, policy, and practitioner audiences alike.","PeriodicalId":47591,"journal":{"name":"Acta Sociologica","volume":"66 1","pages":"350 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Diversity Regimes: Why Talk is Not Enough to Fix Racial Inequality at Universities\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie M. Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00016993221104169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the firm, especially those with clients, either stymied or buttressed these new frameworks. Lastly, Chapter 5 reveals how external supports (e.g. paid staff and grandmothers) helped to ease the pressures of caregiving and further bolstered women’s performance at work. Accidental Feminism has three broad implications for research on social change, work, organizations, globalization, and feminism. First, Ballakrishnen reveals the interplay between local and global forces in a changing profession. The emergence of transnational ideals, like meritocracy, shaped local practices. A novel case of Indian professional firms with more equal outcomes than their counterparts in the United States reveals the importance of thinking globally. The focus also challenges the typical Western lens in U.S. academia. Ballakrishnen calls attention to the tendency in Western scholarship to assume that prosocial change only occurs in the majority White countries. This is especially clear in research on topics like diversity, inclusion, and equity. Second, the accidental nature of this gender-egalitarian change allows for fresh empirical and theoretical insights that have much to inform existing research on workplace inequality. Ballakrishnen reveals how organizational change with advantageous outcomes for workers, in this case women, can be unintentional, rather than the result of deliberate interventions, feminist or otherwise. Unfortunately, much like intentional feminist interventions at work (e.g. “Lean In” and D&I trainings), accidental forms of gender “equality” may build off of and exacerbate other forms of inequality. This brings us to the book’s third broad implication. By combining multiple levels of analysis, Ballakrishnen identifies how new forms of equality may rest on or reproduce other forms of inequality. In law in India, gender, class, and capital interact in the reproduction of inequality. The book thus poses the important question of whether gender parity is feminist: Are the outcomes “feminist” if other forms of intersecting inequalities are not alleviated? Ballakrishnen concludes by considering how the accidental can queer what it means to craft feminist change. Accidental Feminism will appeal to audiences interested in inequality, gender, feminism, class, diversity, inclusion, work, professional services, globalization, and organizational and institutional change. Ballakrishnen has crafted a well-designed study with meticulous analysis, keen insights, and a compelling argument that will inform academic, policy, and practitioner audiences alike.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Sociologica\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"350 - 351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Sociologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993221104169\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Sociologica","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993221104169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该公司,尤其是那些有客户的公司,要么阻碍要么支持这些新框架。最后,第5章揭示了外部支持(如带薪员工和祖母)如何帮助缓解护理压力,并进一步提高妇女的工作表现。偶然女权主义对社会变革、工作、组织、全球化和女权主义的研究有三个广泛的启示。首先,Ballakrishnen揭示了在不断变化的职业中,当地和全球力量之间的相互作用。跨国理想的出现,如精英统治,塑造了当地的做法。一个印度专业公司比美国同行取得更平等成果的新案例揭示了全球思维的重要性。这一焦点也挑战了美国学术界典型的西方视角。Ballakrishnen呼吁人们注意西方学术界的趋势,即认为亲社会的变化只发生在白人占多数的国家。这一点在多样性、包容性和公平性等主题的研究中尤为明显。其次,这种性别平等主义变化的偶然性为现有的工作场所不平等研究提供了新的经验和理论见解。Ballakrishnen揭示了对工人(在这种情况下是女性)有利的组织变革可能是无意的,而不是女权主义或其他蓄意干预的结果。不幸的是,就像工作中有意的女权主义干预(例如“精益”和D&I培训)一样,意外形式的性别“平等”可能会建立并加剧其他形式的不平等。这就引出了这本书的第三个广泛含义。通过结合多个层面的分析,Ballakrishnen确定了新形式的平等如何建立或再现其他形式的不平等。在印度的法律中,性别、阶级和资本在不平等的再生产中相互作用。因此,这本书提出了一个重要的问题,即性别平等是否是女权主义的:如果其他形式的交叉不平等得不到缓解,结果是否是“女权主义的”?Ballakrishnen总结道,考虑到这一偶然事件如何会使女权主义变革的意义变得奇怪。偶然的女权主义将吸引对不平等、性别、女权主义、阶级、多样性、包容性、工作、专业服务、全球化以及组织和制度变革感兴趣的观众。Ballakrishnen精心设计了一项研究,该研究具有细致的分析、敏锐的见解和令人信服的论点,将为学术、政策和从业者受众提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Diversity Regimes: Why Talk is Not Enough to Fix Racial Inequality at Universities
the firm, especially those with clients, either stymied or buttressed these new frameworks. Lastly, Chapter 5 reveals how external supports (e.g. paid staff and grandmothers) helped to ease the pressures of caregiving and further bolstered women’s performance at work. Accidental Feminism has three broad implications for research on social change, work, organizations, globalization, and feminism. First, Ballakrishnen reveals the interplay between local and global forces in a changing profession. The emergence of transnational ideals, like meritocracy, shaped local practices. A novel case of Indian professional firms with more equal outcomes than their counterparts in the United States reveals the importance of thinking globally. The focus also challenges the typical Western lens in U.S. academia. Ballakrishnen calls attention to the tendency in Western scholarship to assume that prosocial change only occurs in the majority White countries. This is especially clear in research on topics like diversity, inclusion, and equity. Second, the accidental nature of this gender-egalitarian change allows for fresh empirical and theoretical insights that have much to inform existing research on workplace inequality. Ballakrishnen reveals how organizational change with advantageous outcomes for workers, in this case women, can be unintentional, rather than the result of deliberate interventions, feminist or otherwise. Unfortunately, much like intentional feminist interventions at work (e.g. “Lean In” and D&I trainings), accidental forms of gender “equality” may build off of and exacerbate other forms of inequality. This brings us to the book’s third broad implication. By combining multiple levels of analysis, Ballakrishnen identifies how new forms of equality may rest on or reproduce other forms of inequality. In law in India, gender, class, and capital interact in the reproduction of inequality. The book thus poses the important question of whether gender parity is feminist: Are the outcomes “feminist” if other forms of intersecting inequalities are not alleviated? Ballakrishnen concludes by considering how the accidental can queer what it means to craft feminist change. Accidental Feminism will appeal to audiences interested in inequality, gender, feminism, class, diversity, inclusion, work, professional services, globalization, and organizational and institutional change. Ballakrishnen has crafted a well-designed study with meticulous analysis, keen insights, and a compelling argument that will inform academic, policy, and practitioner audiences alike.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Sociologica
Acta Sociologica SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Acta Sociologica is a peer reviewed journal which publishes papers on high-quality innovative sociology peer reviewed journal which publishes papers on high-quality innovative sociology carried out from different theoretical and methodological starting points, in the form of full-length original articles and review essays, as well as book reviews and commentaries. Articles that present Nordic sociology or help mediate between Nordic and international scholarly discussions are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信