{"title":"Bec(墨西哥):经典玛雅低地聚落农业研究进展(2019-2022","authors":"E. Lemonnier, Charlotte Arnauld","doi":"10.2993/0278-0771-42.2.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In the ongoing debate about the role of agriculture in the development and decline of Classic (250–950 CE) Maya lowland societies, the archaeological site of Río Bec has a special place. It is one of the few settlements in which, years before the use of LiDAR to survey the Yucatán peninsula, a multi-scalar geoarchaeological study (Río Bec Project 1, 2002–2010) allowed us to define a field system—that is, landed domains of distinct fields organized around their local networks of household units. The dimensions of the fields, their correlation to the size of their corresponding households, and their long period of use (200 years, 700–900 CE), during Río Bec's apogee, raise questions about the fundamental issues of land use practices (intensification, diversification, and specialization) and their sustainability over what was a relatively long period. Those issues are at the heart of a new research program at Río Bec, which we began in 2019, combining an archaeobotanical approach with land use and settlement pattern modeling, ultimately aimed at correlating local agricultural production with demography (Río Bec Project 2, 2019–2022). Based on the knowledge of field and settlement systems in their environment that we accumulated during our past research, the paper starts with a description of the field system in one sector of the Río Bec site, then focuses on the diversity of its plots on the household scale and proceeds to discuss the preliminary correlation that can be established between agricultural intensification and demography at Río Bec at the neighborhood scale and the settlement scale.","PeriodicalId":54838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnobiology","volume":"42 1","pages":"110 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fields and People at Río Bec (Mexico): A Study in Progress (2019-2022) of Settlement Agriculture in the Classic Maya Lowlands\",\"authors\":\"E. Lemonnier, Charlotte Arnauld\",\"doi\":\"10.2993/0278-0771-42.2.110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. In the ongoing debate about the role of agriculture in the development and decline of Classic (250–950 CE) Maya lowland societies, the archaeological site of Río Bec has a special place. It is one of the few settlements in which, years before the use of LiDAR to survey the Yucatán peninsula, a multi-scalar geoarchaeological study (Río Bec Project 1, 2002–2010) allowed us to define a field system—that is, landed domains of distinct fields organized around their local networks of household units. The dimensions of the fields, their correlation to the size of their corresponding households, and their long period of use (200 years, 700–900 CE), during Río Bec's apogee, raise questions about the fundamental issues of land use practices (intensification, diversification, and specialization) and their sustainability over what was a relatively long period. Those issues are at the heart of a new research program at Río Bec, which we began in 2019, combining an archaeobotanical approach with land use and settlement pattern modeling, ultimately aimed at correlating local agricultural production with demography (Río Bec Project 2, 2019–2022). Based on the knowledge of field and settlement systems in their environment that we accumulated during our past research, the paper starts with a description of the field system in one sector of the Río Bec site, then focuses on the diversity of its plots on the household scale and proceeds to discuss the preliminary correlation that can be established between agricultural intensification and demography at Río Bec at the neighborhood scale and the settlement scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ethnobiology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"110 - 130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ethnobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-42.2.110\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnobiology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-42.2.110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fields and People at Río Bec (Mexico): A Study in Progress (2019-2022) of Settlement Agriculture in the Classic Maya Lowlands
Abstract. In the ongoing debate about the role of agriculture in the development and decline of Classic (250–950 CE) Maya lowland societies, the archaeological site of Río Bec has a special place. It is one of the few settlements in which, years before the use of LiDAR to survey the Yucatán peninsula, a multi-scalar geoarchaeological study (Río Bec Project 1, 2002–2010) allowed us to define a field system—that is, landed domains of distinct fields organized around their local networks of household units. The dimensions of the fields, their correlation to the size of their corresponding households, and their long period of use (200 years, 700–900 CE), during Río Bec's apogee, raise questions about the fundamental issues of land use practices (intensification, diversification, and specialization) and their sustainability over what was a relatively long period. Those issues are at the heart of a new research program at Río Bec, which we began in 2019, combining an archaeobotanical approach with land use and settlement pattern modeling, ultimately aimed at correlating local agricultural production with demography (Río Bec Project 2, 2019–2022). Based on the knowledge of field and settlement systems in their environment that we accumulated during our past research, the paper starts with a description of the field system in one sector of the Río Bec site, then focuses on the diversity of its plots on the household scale and proceeds to discuss the preliminary correlation that can be established between agricultural intensification and demography at Río Bec at the neighborhood scale and the settlement scale.
期刊介绍:
JoE’s readership is as wide and diverse as ethnobiology itself, with readers spanning from both the natural and social sciences. Not surprisingly, a glance at the papers published in the Journal reveals the depth and breadth of topics, extending from studies in archaeology and the origins of agriculture, to folk classification systems, to food composition, plants, birds, mammals, fungi and everything in between.
Research areas published in JoE include but are not limited to neo- and paleo-ethnobiology, zooarchaeology, ethnobotany, ethnozoology, ethnopharmacology, ethnoecology, linguistic ethnobiology, human paleoecology, and many other related fields of study within anthropology and biology, such as taxonomy, conservation biology, ethnography, political ecology, and cognitive and cultural anthropology.
JoE does not limit itself to a single perspective, approach or discipline, but seeks to represent the full spectrum and wide diversity of the field of ethnobiology, including cognitive, symbolic, linguistic, ecological, and economic aspects of human interactions with our living world. Articles that significantly advance ethnobiological theory and/or methodology are particularly welcome, as well as studies bridging across disciplines and knowledge systems. JoE does not publish uncontextualized data such as species lists; appropriate submissions must elaborate on the ethnobiological context of findings.