{"title":"黑人和土著未来的情色混乱","authors":"Shanya Cordis","doi":"10.1215/10642684-9449174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tiffany King’s poetic and theoretically compelling text is both an invitation and disturbance, or a provocation to be unmoored, to be thrown into chaos and to place one’s feet at the shoal of something other than traditional (normative) notions of sovereignty, nation, and citizenship. As a metaphor, a methodological meditation, and a Black feminist theoretical framework, King conceptualizes the “Black shoal” as “liminal, indeterminate, and hard to map” and elsewhere describes it as “an interstitial and emerging space of becoming” (3). Drawing on Kamau Brathwaite’s Caribbean poetics of “tidalectics,” which evokes movement that cannot be captured within normative thought and European conceptualizations of time, subjectivity, and place, the shoal is a liminal space of simultaneity — both land and sea — yet unbounded and ever shifting. Within this inability to be made known in white settler geographies and liberal humanist discourses, or what King describes as an “unpredictability [that] exceeds full knowability/mappability” (3), resides the meeting ground for blackness and indigeneity, and the dialogic space between Black studies and Native studies. King thoroughly tracks how Black diasporic and hemispheric work on “middle passages, geographies, rootless relation to nationstates, and encounters with Indigenous peoples amid the violence of New World modernity” (12) index how Black people subjected to the legacies of imperialism, conquest, and nationstate formation “have always been trying to communicate with Indigenous peoples” (13). King explores these moments of the shoal of blackness and indigeneity, as an interruption, or slowing, of dominant narratives within the field of settler colonial studies, as well as certain threads within Native studies, that bind blackness","PeriodicalId":47296,"journal":{"name":"Glq-A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"145 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Erotic Chaos of Black and Indigenous Futures\",\"authors\":\"Shanya Cordis\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/10642684-9449174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tiffany King’s poetic and theoretically compelling text is both an invitation and disturbance, or a provocation to be unmoored, to be thrown into chaos and to place one’s feet at the shoal of something other than traditional (normative) notions of sovereignty, nation, and citizenship. As a metaphor, a methodological meditation, and a Black feminist theoretical framework, King conceptualizes the “Black shoal” as “liminal, indeterminate, and hard to map” and elsewhere describes it as “an interstitial and emerging space of becoming” (3). Drawing on Kamau Brathwaite’s Caribbean poetics of “tidalectics,” which evokes movement that cannot be captured within normative thought and European conceptualizations of time, subjectivity, and place, the shoal is a liminal space of simultaneity — both land and sea — yet unbounded and ever shifting. Within this inability to be made known in white settler geographies and liberal humanist discourses, or what King describes as an “unpredictability [that] exceeds full knowability/mappability” (3), resides the meeting ground for blackness and indigeneity, and the dialogic space between Black studies and Native studies. King thoroughly tracks how Black diasporic and hemispheric work on “middle passages, geographies, rootless relation to nationstates, and encounters with Indigenous peoples amid the violence of New World modernity” (12) index how Black people subjected to the legacies of imperialism, conquest, and nationstate formation “have always been trying to communicate with Indigenous peoples” (13). King explores these moments of the shoal of blackness and indigeneity, as an interruption, or slowing, of dominant narratives within the field of settler colonial studies, as well as certain threads within Native studies, that bind blackness\",\"PeriodicalId\":47296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glq-A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"145 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glq-A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-9449174\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glq-A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-9449174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tiffany King’s poetic and theoretically compelling text is both an invitation and disturbance, or a provocation to be unmoored, to be thrown into chaos and to place one’s feet at the shoal of something other than traditional (normative) notions of sovereignty, nation, and citizenship. As a metaphor, a methodological meditation, and a Black feminist theoretical framework, King conceptualizes the “Black shoal” as “liminal, indeterminate, and hard to map” and elsewhere describes it as “an interstitial and emerging space of becoming” (3). Drawing on Kamau Brathwaite’s Caribbean poetics of “tidalectics,” which evokes movement that cannot be captured within normative thought and European conceptualizations of time, subjectivity, and place, the shoal is a liminal space of simultaneity — both land and sea — yet unbounded and ever shifting. Within this inability to be made known in white settler geographies and liberal humanist discourses, or what King describes as an “unpredictability [that] exceeds full knowability/mappability” (3), resides the meeting ground for blackness and indigeneity, and the dialogic space between Black studies and Native studies. King thoroughly tracks how Black diasporic and hemispheric work on “middle passages, geographies, rootless relation to nationstates, and encounters with Indigenous peoples amid the violence of New World modernity” (12) index how Black people subjected to the legacies of imperialism, conquest, and nationstate formation “have always been trying to communicate with Indigenous peoples” (13). King explores these moments of the shoal of blackness and indigeneity, as an interruption, or slowing, of dominant narratives within the field of settler colonial studies, as well as certain threads within Native studies, that bind blackness
期刊介绍:
Providing a much-needed forum for interdisciplinary discussion, GLQ publishes scholarship, criticism, and commentary in areas as diverse as law, science studies, religion, political science, and literary studies. Its aim is to offer queer perspectives on all issues touching on sex and sexuality. In an effort to achieve the widest possible historical, geographic, and cultural scope, GLQ particularly seeks out new research into historical periods before the twentieth century, into non-Anglophone cultures, and into the experience of those who have been marginalized by race, ethnicity, age, social class, body morphology, or sexual practice.