今日巴西的环境思考与本土艺术

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
J. P. Dias
{"title":"今日巴西的环境思考与本土艺术","authors":"J. P. Dias","doi":"10.1080/13569325.2022.2089101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I consider intersections between environmental thinking and Indigenous art-making in recent scholarship and artistic production in Brazil, situating some of their contributions to Latin American Cultural Studies in recent years. I examine Stelio Marras, Joana Cabral de Oliveira, Marta Amoroso et al.’s Vozes vegetais: Diversidade, resistência e histórias da floresta (Plant Voices: Diversity, Resistance and Forest Histories , 2021) and Ailton Krenak’s A vida não é útil (Life is Not Useful , 2020a). I show that both works challenge extractivist paradigms and the hierarchisation of life forms. I then consider works by two Indigenous artists: Glicéria Tupinambá’s powerful reclaiming of the traditional Tupinambá cloak, and Denilson Baniwa’s critical engagements with museums and collectionism. By mapping some of the emerging directions in environmental thinking and Indigenous arts in Brazil, I argue that recent shifts in scholarship and artistic production in the country owe much to Indigenous approaches to interspecies relationality, offering valuable lessons about forms of creativity that resist commodification.","PeriodicalId":56341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"141 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Thinking and Indigenous Arts in Brazil Today\",\"authors\":\"J. P. Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13569325.2022.2089101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay, I consider intersections between environmental thinking and Indigenous art-making in recent scholarship and artistic production in Brazil, situating some of their contributions to Latin American Cultural Studies in recent years. I examine Stelio Marras, Joana Cabral de Oliveira, Marta Amoroso et al.’s Vozes vegetais: Diversidade, resistência e histórias da floresta (Plant Voices: Diversity, Resistance and Forest Histories , 2021) and Ailton Krenak’s A vida não é útil (Life is Not Useful , 2020a). I show that both works challenge extractivist paradigms and the hierarchisation of life forms. I then consider works by two Indigenous artists: Glicéria Tupinambá’s powerful reclaiming of the traditional Tupinambá cloak, and Denilson Baniwa’s critical engagements with museums and collectionism. By mapping some of the emerging directions in environmental thinking and Indigenous arts in Brazil, I argue that recent shifts in scholarship and artistic production in the country owe much to Indigenous approaches to interspecies relationality, offering valuable lessons about forms of creativity that resist commodification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"141 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2022.2089101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2022.2089101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我考虑了最近在巴西的学术和艺术生产中环境思维和土著艺术创作之间的交集,以及近年来他们对拉丁美洲文化研究的一些贡献。我研究了Stelio Marras, Joana Cabral de Oliveira, Marta Amoroso等人的Vozes vegetais: Diversidade, resistência e histórias da floresta(植物之声:多样性,抗性和森林历史,2021)和Ailton Krenak的A vida n o útil(生命没有用,2020a)。我表明,这两件作品都挑战了抽取主义范式和生命形式的等级制度。然后,我考虑了两位土著艺术家的作品:格里克萨里亚·图皮纳姆·布对传统图皮纳姆·布斗篷的有力复兴,以及德尼尔森·巴尼瓦与博物馆和收藏主义的批判性合作。通过描绘巴西环境思维和土著艺术的一些新兴方向,我认为,该国最近的学术和艺术生产转变在很大程度上归功于土著对物种间关系的研究方法,为抵制商品化的创造力形式提供了宝贵的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental Thinking and Indigenous Arts in Brazil Today
In this essay, I consider intersections between environmental thinking and Indigenous art-making in recent scholarship and artistic production in Brazil, situating some of their contributions to Latin American Cultural Studies in recent years. I examine Stelio Marras, Joana Cabral de Oliveira, Marta Amoroso et al.’s Vozes vegetais: Diversidade, resistência e histórias da floresta (Plant Voices: Diversity, Resistance and Forest Histories , 2021) and Ailton Krenak’s A vida não é útil (Life is Not Useful , 2020a). I show that both works challenge extractivist paradigms and the hierarchisation of life forms. I then consider works by two Indigenous artists: Glicéria Tupinambá’s powerful reclaiming of the traditional Tupinambá cloak, and Denilson Baniwa’s critical engagements with museums and collectionism. By mapping some of the emerging directions in environmental thinking and Indigenous arts in Brazil, I argue that recent shifts in scholarship and artistic production in the country owe much to Indigenous approaches to interspecies relationality, offering valuable lessons about forms of creativity that resist commodification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信