尼日利亚西南部慢性肾病人群肾小球滤过率的CKD-EPI、C-G和MDRD方程的比较

R. Braimoh, T. I. Ediale, M. Mabayoje, O. Ale, B. Bello, C. Amira
{"title":"尼日利亚西南部慢性肾病人群肾小球滤过率的CKD-EPI、C-G和MDRD方程的比较","authors":"R. Braimoh, T. I. Ediale, M. Mabayoje, O. Ale, B. Bello, C. Amira","doi":"10.4314/rejhs.v11i4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ethnic variabilities make reliability of formula equations for assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) doubtful in many  populations. We compared Cockroft-Gault (CG), modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), and chronic kidney diseases epidemiology  collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in adult Nigerian CKD subjects. \nMethodology: We measured 24-hour-urinary creatinine clearance of 311 adult CKD patients and compared with the three estimated  equations. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between estimated equations and measured creatinine clearance (mGFR).  Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic power of the equations. Equation with accuracy within 30% of mGFR of ≥90% was considered acceptable for use. \nResults: Mean age was 41.9±12.7 years with 182(58.5%) females. The mean GFR using  CKD-EPI, 2 MDRD and CG equations were 69.5±33.9, 65.9±33.0 and 66.2±30.9 mls/min/1.73m respectively 2 (mGFR 68.3±31.1mls/min /1.73m ). The 3 equations showed positive correlation to mGFR (r=0.95) but CKD-EPI had the least bias. \nConclusion: All three equations  can be used but CKD-EPI equation is preferable in Nigerian CKD patients, especially with GFR> 60mls/min.  ","PeriodicalId":29646,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of CKD-EPI, C-G and MDRD equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in chronic kidney disease population in South-Western Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"R. Braimoh, T. I. Ediale, M. Mabayoje, O. Ale, B. Bello, C. Amira\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/rejhs.v11i4.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ethnic variabilities make reliability of formula equations for assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) doubtful in many  populations. We compared Cockroft-Gault (CG), modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), and chronic kidney diseases epidemiology  collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in adult Nigerian CKD subjects. \\nMethodology: We measured 24-hour-urinary creatinine clearance of 311 adult CKD patients and compared with the three estimated  equations. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between estimated equations and measured creatinine clearance (mGFR).  Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic power of the equations. Equation with accuracy within 30% of mGFR of ≥90% was considered acceptable for use. \\nResults: Mean age was 41.9±12.7 years with 182(58.5%) females. The mean GFR using  CKD-EPI, 2 MDRD and CG equations were 69.5±33.9, 65.9±33.0 and 66.2±30.9 mls/min/1.73m respectively 2 (mGFR 68.3±31.1mls/min /1.73m ). The 3 equations showed positive correlation to mGFR (r=0.95) but CKD-EPI had the least bias. \\nConclusion: All three equations  can be used but CKD-EPI equation is preferable in Nigerian CKD patients, especially with GFR> 60mls/min.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":29646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/rejhs.v11i4.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rejhs.v11i4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:种族差异使得评估肾小球滤过率(GFR)的公式方程在许多人群中的可靠性值得怀疑。我们比较了尼日利亚成年CKD受试者的Cockroft-Gault (CG)、肾病患者饮食改变(MDRD)和慢性肾病流行病学协作(CKD- epi)方程。方法:我们测量了311名成年CKD患者的24小时尿肌酐清除率,并与三个估计方程进行了比较。Bland-Altman图用于评估估计方程与测量肌酐清除率(mGFR)之间的一致性。采用受试者工作曲线(Receiver-operating curve, ROC)分析评估方程的诊断能力。方程的准确度在mGFR≥90%的30%以内被认为是可接受的。结果:平均年龄41.9±12.7岁,女性182例(58.5%)。使用CKD-EPI、2 MDRD和CG方程的平均GFR分别为69.5±33.9、65.9±33.0和66.2±30.9 mls/min/1.73m 2 (mGFR为68.3±31.1mls/min /1.73m)。3个方程均与mGFR呈正相关(r=0.95),但CKD-EPI偏差最小。结论:3种方程均可应用,但CKD- epi方程适用于尼日利亚CKD患者,尤其是GFR≥60ml /min的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of CKD-EPI, C-G and MDRD equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in chronic kidney disease population in South-Western Nigeria
Background: Ethnic variabilities make reliability of formula equations for assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) doubtful in many  populations. We compared Cockroft-Gault (CG), modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), and chronic kidney diseases epidemiology  collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in adult Nigerian CKD subjects. Methodology: We measured 24-hour-urinary creatinine clearance of 311 adult CKD patients and compared with the three estimated  equations. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between estimated equations and measured creatinine clearance (mGFR).  Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic power of the equations. Equation with accuracy within 30% of mGFR of ≥90% was considered acceptable for use. Results: Mean age was 41.9±12.7 years with 182(58.5%) females. The mean GFR using  CKD-EPI, 2 MDRD and CG equations were 69.5±33.9, 65.9±33.0 and 66.2±30.9 mls/min/1.73m respectively 2 (mGFR 68.3±31.1mls/min /1.73m ). The 3 equations showed positive correlation to mGFR (r=0.95) but CKD-EPI had the least bias. Conclusion: All three equations  can be used but CKD-EPI equation is preferable in Nigerian CKD patients, especially with GFR> 60mls/min.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信