浮动电荷的结晶:重新思考概念框架

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW
J. Quinn
{"title":"浮动电荷的结晶:重新思考概念框架","authors":"J. Quinn","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2019.1648109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Crystallisation is the name given to the conversion of a floating charge into a fixed charge. While much has been written on how charges are classified as fixed or floating and on the theoretical nature of the floating charge, crystallisation is, by comparison, less developed. This article offers three main contributions. First, it draws a clear distinction between two types of crystallisation: automatic and express. Second, it applies the theoretical literature on floating charges to crystallisation and examines the different meanings crystallisation takes under these theoretical frameworks. Finally, it makes an original argument on the effectiveness of express crystallisation clauses. The claim is that because a crystallised floating charge establishes the same proprietary interest as a fixed charge ab initio, the legal criteria necessary to create a fixed charge should also be necessary for the triggering of an express crystallisation clause to be effective in crystallising a charge.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"179 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2019.1648109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The crystallisation of floating charges: rethinking the conceptual framework\",\"authors\":\"J. Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735970.2019.1648109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Crystallisation is the name given to the conversion of a floating charge into a fixed charge. While much has been written on how charges are classified as fixed or floating and on the theoretical nature of the floating charge, crystallisation is, by comparison, less developed. This article offers three main contributions. First, it draws a clear distinction between two types of crystallisation: automatic and express. Second, it applies the theoretical literature on floating charges to crystallisation and examines the different meanings crystallisation takes under these theoretical frameworks. Finally, it makes an original argument on the effectiveness of express crystallisation clauses. The claim is that because a crystallised floating charge establishes the same proprietary interest as a fixed charge ab initio, the legal criteria necessary to create a fixed charge should also be necessary for the triggering of an express crystallisation clause to be effective in crystallising a charge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2019.1648109\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2019.1648109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2019.1648109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要结晶是指将浮动电荷转化为固定电荷的过程。虽然关于电荷如何被归类为固定电荷或浮动电荷以及浮动电荷的理论性质已经有很多文章,但相比之下,结晶化还不太发达。本文提供了三个主要贡献。首先,它明确区分了两种类型的结晶:自动结晶和快速结晶。其次,它将浮动电荷的理论文献应用于结晶,并考察了结晶在这些理论框架下的不同含义。最后,对明示具体化条款的效力进行了初步论证。该主张认为,由于明确的浮动押记从一开始就确立了与固定押记相同的所有权权益,因此,设立固定押记所需的法律标准也应是触发明确的明确条款以使押记具体化的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The crystallisation of floating charges: rethinking the conceptual framework
ABSTRACT Crystallisation is the name given to the conversion of a floating charge into a fixed charge. While much has been written on how charges are classified as fixed or floating and on the theoretical nature of the floating charge, crystallisation is, by comparison, less developed. This article offers three main contributions. First, it draws a clear distinction between two types of crystallisation: automatic and express. Second, it applies the theoretical literature on floating charges to crystallisation and examines the different meanings crystallisation takes under these theoretical frameworks. Finally, it makes an original argument on the effectiveness of express crystallisation clauses. The claim is that because a crystallised floating charge establishes the same proprietary interest as a fixed charge ab initio, the legal criteria necessary to create a fixed charge should also be necessary for the triggering of an express crystallisation clause to be effective in crystallising a charge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信