构建政府非英语公共沟通的最佳实践:以澳大利亚新南威尔士州为例

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW
A. Grey, Alyssa A. Severin
{"title":"构建政府非英语公共沟通的最佳实践:以澳大利亚新南威尔士州为例","authors":"A. Grey, Alyssa A. Severin","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2022.2031526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Through NSW’s recent run of bushfires and COVID-19, the importance of government communications reaching the whole public has become increasingly obvious. Other Australian governments, and governments worldwide, face similar challenges. Linguistic exclusion from government communications can create real dangers to individuals and communities and push people towards misinformation. It is a fundamental problem for societies founded on principles of equality, responsible government, and equal civic participation. Yet official government communications practices in languages other than English (LOTEs) are rarely studied. This socio-legal study brings both visibility and an analytic critique to the NSW Government’s public communications practices, building on the authors’ prior analysis of the underlying laws and policies in this journal. This empirical examination of web-based communications from 28 departments and agencies identifies real problems, even though the NSW Government makes some effort to publicly communicate in LOTEs: we found no consistency or predictability across websites in relation to the range of LOTEs used, the amount of LOTE content produced, or the steps by which it could be accessed. The study raises serious concerns about the government’s responsiveness to, representation of, and accountability to NSW’s highly multilingual public, and bolsters the call for more informed and strategic communications policy.","PeriodicalId":45376,"journal":{"name":"Griffith Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building towards best practice for governments’ public communications in languages other than English: a case study of New South Wales, Australia\",\"authors\":\"A. Grey, Alyssa A. Severin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10383441.2022.2031526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Through NSW’s recent run of bushfires and COVID-19, the importance of government communications reaching the whole public has become increasingly obvious. Other Australian governments, and governments worldwide, face similar challenges. Linguistic exclusion from government communications can create real dangers to individuals and communities and push people towards misinformation. It is a fundamental problem for societies founded on principles of equality, responsible government, and equal civic participation. Yet official government communications practices in languages other than English (LOTEs) are rarely studied. This socio-legal study brings both visibility and an analytic critique to the NSW Government’s public communications practices, building on the authors’ prior analysis of the underlying laws and policies in this journal. This empirical examination of web-based communications from 28 departments and agencies identifies real problems, even though the NSW Government makes some effort to publicly communicate in LOTEs: we found no consistency or predictability across websites in relation to the range of LOTEs used, the amount of LOTE content produced, or the steps by which it could be accessed. The study raises serious concerns about the government’s responsiveness to, representation of, and accountability to NSW’s highly multilingual public, and bolsters the call for more informed and strategic communications policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Griffith Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Griffith Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2031526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Griffith Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2031526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过新南威尔士州最近发生的森林大火和COVID-19,政府与公众沟通的重要性变得越来越明显。其他澳大利亚政府和世界各国政府也面临着类似的挑战。在政府沟通中排除语言可能对个人和社区造成真正的危险,并将人们推向错误的信息。对于建立在平等、负责任政府和平等公民参与原则基础上的社会来说,这是一个根本性的问题。然而,很少有人研究英语以外语言的政府官方沟通实践。这项社会法律研究为新南威尔士州政府的公共传播实践带来了可见性和分析性批评,建立在作者对本杂志中潜在法律和政策的先前分析的基础上。这项对来自28个部门和机构的基于网络的交流进行的实证研究发现了真正的问题,尽管新南威尔士州政府做出了一些努力,以公开交流LOTE:我们发现,在使用LOTE的范围、LOTE内容的数量或可以访问的步骤方面,各网站之间没有一致性或可预测性。该研究对政府对新南威尔士州多语言公众的反应、代表和问责提出了严重关切,并支持了对更知情和更具战略性的沟通政策的呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building towards best practice for governments’ public communications in languages other than English: a case study of New South Wales, Australia
ABSTRACT Through NSW’s recent run of bushfires and COVID-19, the importance of government communications reaching the whole public has become increasingly obvious. Other Australian governments, and governments worldwide, face similar challenges. Linguistic exclusion from government communications can create real dangers to individuals and communities and push people towards misinformation. It is a fundamental problem for societies founded on principles of equality, responsible government, and equal civic participation. Yet official government communications practices in languages other than English (LOTEs) are rarely studied. This socio-legal study brings both visibility and an analytic critique to the NSW Government’s public communications practices, building on the authors’ prior analysis of the underlying laws and policies in this journal. This empirical examination of web-based communications from 28 departments and agencies identifies real problems, even though the NSW Government makes some effort to publicly communicate in LOTEs: we found no consistency or predictability across websites in relation to the range of LOTEs used, the amount of LOTE content produced, or the steps by which it could be accessed. The study raises serious concerns about the government’s responsiveness to, representation of, and accountability to NSW’s highly multilingual public, and bolsters the call for more informed and strategic communications policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信