{"title":"比例致残:托马斯·杰斐逊在第64号法案中关于面部毁容的规定的起源","authors":"Emily Cock","doi":"10.1017/S0080440119000069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 1779, Thomas Jefferson proposed the use of nose-cutting to punish women convicted of specific offences, and the use of retaliation (lex talionis) for anyone who deliberately disfigured another person. These punishments were intended to replace the death penalty for these crimes, and as such formed part of Jefferson's attempt to rationalise the Virginian law code in line with eighteenth-century reform principles. Jefferson drew on British laws from the Anglo-Saxon period to the Coventry Act for his bill, but his proposals contrast strikingly with British movements away from corporal marking as punishment used against their own citizens. This article examines the origins and fates of equivalent crimes and punishments in the law codes Jefferson examined, and compares the legal and wider connotations of facial appearance and disfigurement that made these proposals coherent in Virginia when they had long ceased elsewhere. Tracing examples and discussion of these intersecting cases will greatly increase our understanding of Jefferson's proposals, and the relationships between facial difference, stigma and disability in eighteenth-century America. CRYNODEB Ym 1779, cynigiodd Thomas Jefferson y dylid cosbi menywod a oedd yn euog o droseddau penodol drwy dorri eu trwynau, a defnyddio dial (lex talionis) ar gyfer unrhyw un a anffurfiodd berson arall yn fwriadol. Bwriad y cosbau hyn oedd disodli'r gosb eithaf ar gyfer y troseddau hyn, ac felly roeddent yn rhan o ymgais Jefferson i resymoli cod cyfreithiol Virginia yn unol ag egwyddorion diwygio'r ddeunawfed ganrif. Cynlluniodd Jefferson fesur ar sail cyfreithiau Prydeinig o'r cyfnod Eingl-Sacsonaidd hyd at Ddeddf Coventry, ond roedd ei gynigion yn cyferbynnu'n drawiadol â symudiadau Prydain oddi wrth gosbi ei dinasyddion yn gorfforol. Mae'r erthygl hon yn edrych ar darddiad a thynged troseddau a chosbau cyfatebol y cyfreithiau roedd Jefferson yn eu harchwilio. Mae'n cymharu'r arwyddocâd cyfreithiol ac ehangach o ymddangosiad y wyneb ac anffurfio'r wyneb, a olygodd bod y cynigion hyn yn rhesymegol yn Virginia pan oeddent wedi dod i ben mewn mannau eraill ers amser maith. Byddwn yn cynyddu'n dealltwriaeth o gynigion Jefferson wrth olrhain enghreifftiau a thrafod yr achosion croestoriadol hyn, a'r berthynas rhwng anffurfio'r wyneb, stigma, ac anabledd yn America yn y ddeunawfed ganrif.","PeriodicalId":23231,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society","volume":"29 1","pages":"127 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0080440119000069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROPORTIONATE MAIMING: THE ORIGINS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON'S PROVISIONS FOR FACIAL DISFIGUREMENT IN BILL 64\",\"authors\":\"Emily Cock\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0080440119000069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In 1779, Thomas Jefferson proposed the use of nose-cutting to punish women convicted of specific offences, and the use of retaliation (lex talionis) for anyone who deliberately disfigured another person. These punishments were intended to replace the death penalty for these crimes, and as such formed part of Jefferson's attempt to rationalise the Virginian law code in line with eighteenth-century reform principles. Jefferson drew on British laws from the Anglo-Saxon period to the Coventry Act for his bill, but his proposals contrast strikingly with British movements away from corporal marking as punishment used against their own citizens. This article examines the origins and fates of equivalent crimes and punishments in the law codes Jefferson examined, and compares the legal and wider connotations of facial appearance and disfigurement that made these proposals coherent in Virginia when they had long ceased elsewhere. Tracing examples and discussion of these intersecting cases will greatly increase our understanding of Jefferson's proposals, and the relationships between facial difference, stigma and disability in eighteenth-century America. CRYNODEB Ym 1779, cynigiodd Thomas Jefferson y dylid cosbi menywod a oedd yn euog o droseddau penodol drwy dorri eu trwynau, a defnyddio dial (lex talionis) ar gyfer unrhyw un a anffurfiodd berson arall yn fwriadol. Bwriad y cosbau hyn oedd disodli'r gosb eithaf ar gyfer y troseddau hyn, ac felly roeddent yn rhan o ymgais Jefferson i resymoli cod cyfreithiol Virginia yn unol ag egwyddorion diwygio'r ddeunawfed ganrif. Cynlluniodd Jefferson fesur ar sail cyfreithiau Prydeinig o'r cyfnod Eingl-Sacsonaidd hyd at Ddeddf Coventry, ond roedd ei gynigion yn cyferbynnu'n drawiadol â symudiadau Prydain oddi wrth gosbi ei dinasyddion yn gorfforol. Mae'r erthygl hon yn edrych ar darddiad a thynged troseddau a chosbau cyfatebol y cyfreithiau roedd Jefferson yn eu harchwilio. Mae'n cymharu'r arwyddocâd cyfreithiol ac ehangach o ymddangosiad y wyneb ac anffurfio'r wyneb, a olygodd bod y cynigion hyn yn rhesymegol yn Virginia pan oeddent wedi dod i ben mewn mannau eraill ers amser maith. Byddwn yn cynyddu'n dealltwriaeth o gynigion Jefferson wrth olrhain enghreifftiau a thrafod yr achosion croestoriadol hyn, a'r berthynas rhwng anffurfio'r wyneb, stigma, ac anabledd yn America yn y ddeunawfed ganrif.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"127 - 151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0080440119000069\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080440119000069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080440119000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1779年,托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson)提议使用割鼻术来惩罚犯有特定罪行的女性,并对任何故意毁容他人的人使用报复法(lex talionis)。这些惩罚旨在取代对这些罪行的死刑,因此,杰斐逊试图根据18世纪的改革原则使弗吉尼亚法典合理化,这是杰斐逊尝试的一部分。杰斐逊的法案借鉴了从盎格鲁-撒克逊时期到考文垂法案(Coventry Act)的英国法律,但他的提议与英国的运动形成鲜明对比,后者不再将体罚作为惩罚本国公民的手段。本文考察了杰弗逊所研究的法典中同等罪行和惩罚的起源和命运,并比较了面部外观和毁容的法律和更广泛的内涵,这些内涵使这些建议在弗吉尼亚连贯一致,而这些建议在其他地方早已停止。对这些交叉案例的追溯和讨论将极大地增加我们对杰斐逊建议的理解,以及18世纪美国面部差异、耻辱和残疾之间的关系。1779年,美国著名政治家托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson)被任命为美国总统,他被任命为美国总统,并被任命为美国总统,他被任命为美国总统,并被任命为美国总统。在美国,他被称为“美国人”,被称为“美国人”,被称为“美国人”,被称为“美国人”,被称为“美国人”,被称为“美国人”,被称为“美国人”,被称为“美国人”,被称为“美国人”。在英国考文垂学院,英国-萨克逊学院在英国考文垂学院进行了联合研究,在英国考文垂学院进行了联合研究,并在英国考文垂学院进行了联合研究。我的每一个人都有自己的想法,我的每一个人都有自己的想法,我的想法是,我的想法是,我的想法是,我的想法是,我的想法是,我的想法是。阿梅’cymharu或arwyddocad cyfreithiol ac ehangach ymddangosiad y wyneb ac anffurfio或wyneb, olygodd bod y cynigion hyn yn rhesymegol yn弗吉尼亚锅oeddent wedi国防部我本mewn mannau eraill人ams maith。拜登(Byddwn)在纽约与美国前总统杰斐逊(gynigion Jefferson)进行了激烈的斗争,在美国,拜登(Byddwn)通过非法的犯罪行为,使美国的种族歧视和耻辱得以消除。
PROPORTIONATE MAIMING: THE ORIGINS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON'S PROVISIONS FOR FACIAL DISFIGUREMENT IN BILL 64
ABSTRACT In 1779, Thomas Jefferson proposed the use of nose-cutting to punish women convicted of specific offences, and the use of retaliation (lex talionis) for anyone who deliberately disfigured another person. These punishments were intended to replace the death penalty for these crimes, and as such formed part of Jefferson's attempt to rationalise the Virginian law code in line with eighteenth-century reform principles. Jefferson drew on British laws from the Anglo-Saxon period to the Coventry Act for his bill, but his proposals contrast strikingly with British movements away from corporal marking as punishment used against their own citizens. This article examines the origins and fates of equivalent crimes and punishments in the law codes Jefferson examined, and compares the legal and wider connotations of facial appearance and disfigurement that made these proposals coherent in Virginia when they had long ceased elsewhere. Tracing examples and discussion of these intersecting cases will greatly increase our understanding of Jefferson's proposals, and the relationships between facial difference, stigma and disability in eighteenth-century America. CRYNODEB Ym 1779, cynigiodd Thomas Jefferson y dylid cosbi menywod a oedd yn euog o droseddau penodol drwy dorri eu trwynau, a defnyddio dial (lex talionis) ar gyfer unrhyw un a anffurfiodd berson arall yn fwriadol. Bwriad y cosbau hyn oedd disodli'r gosb eithaf ar gyfer y troseddau hyn, ac felly roeddent yn rhan o ymgais Jefferson i resymoli cod cyfreithiol Virginia yn unol ag egwyddorion diwygio'r ddeunawfed ganrif. Cynlluniodd Jefferson fesur ar sail cyfreithiau Prydeinig o'r cyfnod Eingl-Sacsonaidd hyd at Ddeddf Coventry, ond roedd ei gynigion yn cyferbynnu'n drawiadol â symudiadau Prydain oddi wrth gosbi ei dinasyddion yn gorfforol. Mae'r erthygl hon yn edrych ar darddiad a thynged troseddau a chosbau cyfatebol y cyfreithiau roedd Jefferson yn eu harchwilio. Mae'n cymharu'r arwyddocâd cyfreithiol ac ehangach o ymddangosiad y wyneb ac anffurfio'r wyneb, a olygodd bod y cynigion hyn yn rhesymegol yn Virginia pan oeddent wedi dod i ben mewn mannau eraill ers amser maith. Byddwn yn cynyddu'n dealltwriaeth o gynigion Jefferson wrth olrhain enghreifftiau a thrafod yr achosion croestoriadol hyn, a'r berthynas rhwng anffurfio'r wyneb, stigma, ac anabledd yn America yn y ddeunawfed ganrif.
期刊介绍:
The Royal Historical Society has published the highest quality scholarship in history for over 150 years. A subscription includes a substantial annual volume of the Society’s Transactions, which presents wide-ranging reports from the front lines of historical research by both senior and younger scholars, and two volumes from the Camden Fifth Series, which makes available to a wider audience valuable primary sources that have hitherto been available only in manuscript form.