书评:《跨性别青年医疗同意书》

Q2 Social Sciences
Rita D’Alton-Harrison
{"title":"书评:《跨性别青年医疗同意书》","authors":"Rita D’Alton-Harrison","doi":"10.1177/09685332231172411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What do we know about trans identity other than how medicalised and politicised it has become? Steph Jowett seeks to debunk the myth that the law is fully conversant with the issues affecting trans youth. As the book demonstrates, even reliance on the prescient nature of medical knowledge does not guarantee that the current legal framework is sufficiently equipped to protect the rights of individuals within this group. Jowett establishes her position at the outset as a supporter of medical treatment for trans youth, describing legal obstacles to medical treatment as contributing to the denial of trans identity. In chapter two of the book, she takes us through the known research in this area and notes that there is a lack of longitudinal research studies that could provide consensus on the current debate about trans rights and whether those rights should be curtailed in any way. Although the book provides us with a useful navigation through the available data and research studies, no firm conclusions can be drawn about the longterm benefits of medical treatment. When reading this chapter, one begins to wonder whether it may be easier to reflect on what we do not know about the experiences and rights of trans youth or to assess what we cannot say with any certainty. For example:","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"23 1","pages":"200 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Consent for Medical Treatment of Trans Youth\",\"authors\":\"Rita D’Alton-Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09685332231172411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What do we know about trans identity other than how medicalised and politicised it has become? Steph Jowett seeks to debunk the myth that the law is fully conversant with the issues affecting trans youth. As the book demonstrates, even reliance on the prescient nature of medical knowledge does not guarantee that the current legal framework is sufficiently equipped to protect the rights of individuals within this group. Jowett establishes her position at the outset as a supporter of medical treatment for trans youth, describing legal obstacles to medical treatment as contributing to the denial of trans identity. In chapter two of the book, she takes us through the known research in this area and notes that there is a lack of longitudinal research studies that could provide consensus on the current debate about trans rights and whether those rights should be curtailed in any way. Although the book provides us with a useful navigation through the available data and research studies, no firm conclusions can be drawn about the longterm benefits of medical treatment. When reading this chapter, one begins to wonder whether it may be easier to reflect on what we do not know about the experiences and rights of trans youth or to assess what we cannot say with any certainty. For example:\",\"PeriodicalId\":39602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Law International\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"200 - 205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Law International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332231172411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332231172411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除了跨性别身份如何被医学化和政治化之外,我们对跨性别身份了解多少?Stephen Jowett试图揭穿法律完全熟悉影响跨性别青年的问题的神话。正如这本书所表明的那样,即使依赖医学知识的先见之明性质,也不能保证当前的法律框架足以保护这一群体中个人的权利。乔维特从一开始就确立了她作为跨性别青年医疗的支持者的立场,她将医疗的法律障碍描述为拒绝跨性别身份的原因之一。在本书的第二章中,她带领我们了解了这一领域的已知研究,并指出缺乏纵向研究,无法就当前关于跨性别权利的辩论以及是否应该以任何方式限制这些权利达成共识。尽管这本书为我们提供了一个有用的导航,可以浏览现有的数据和研究,但对于医疗的长期益处,还没有得出确切的结论。当阅读这一章时,人们开始怀疑,反思我们对跨性别青年的经历和权利所不了解的事情,或者评估我们不能肯定地说的话,是否更容易。例如:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book review: Consent for Medical Treatment of Trans Youth
What do we know about trans identity other than how medicalised and politicised it has become? Steph Jowett seeks to debunk the myth that the law is fully conversant with the issues affecting trans youth. As the book demonstrates, even reliance on the prescient nature of medical knowledge does not guarantee that the current legal framework is sufficiently equipped to protect the rights of individuals within this group. Jowett establishes her position at the outset as a supporter of medical treatment for trans youth, describing legal obstacles to medical treatment as contributing to the denial of trans identity. In chapter two of the book, she takes us through the known research in this area and notes that there is a lack of longitudinal research studies that could provide consensus on the current debate about trans rights and whether those rights should be curtailed in any way. Although the book provides us with a useful navigation through the available data and research studies, no firm conclusions can be drawn about the longterm benefits of medical treatment. When reading this chapter, one begins to wonder whether it may be easier to reflect on what we do not know about the experiences and rights of trans youth or to assess what we cannot say with any certainty. For example:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law International
Medical Law International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The scope includes: Clinical Negligence. Health Matters Affecting Civil Liberties. Forensic Medicine. Determination of Death. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. End of Life Decisions. Legal and Ethical Issues in Medical Treatment. Confidentiality. Access to Medical Records. Medical Complaints Procedures. Professional Discipline. Employment Law and Legal Issues within NHS. Resource Allocation in Health Care. Mental Health Law. Misuse of Drugs. Legal and Ethical Issues concerning Human Reproduction. Therapeutic Products. Medical Research. Cloning. Gene Therapy. Genetic Testing and Screening. And Related Topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信