“除非”为“或”,除非“A除非A”无效

Q2 Arts and Humanities
DIALECTICA Pub Date : 2022-11-18 DOI:10.48106/dial.v74.i2.07
R. Cook
{"title":"“除非”为“或”,除非“A除非A”无效","authors":"R. Cook","doi":"10.48106/dial.v74.i2.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proper translation of \"unless\" into intuitionistic formalisms is examined. After a brief examination of intuitionistic writings on \"unless\", and on translation in general, and a close examination of Dummett's use of \"unless\" in Elements of Intuitionism (1975b), I argue that the correct intuitionistic translation of \"A unless B\" is no stronger than \"-B -> A\". In particular, \"unless\" is demonstrably weaker than disjunction. I conclude with some observations regarding how this shows that one's choice of logic is methodologically prior to translation from informal natural language to formal systems.","PeriodicalId":46676,"journal":{"name":"DIALECTICA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Unless' is 'Or', Unless '¬A Unless A' is Invalid\",\"authors\":\"R. Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.48106/dial.v74.i2.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The proper translation of \\\"unless\\\" into intuitionistic formalisms is examined. After a brief examination of intuitionistic writings on \\\"unless\\\", and on translation in general, and a close examination of Dummett's use of \\\"unless\\\" in Elements of Intuitionism (1975b), I argue that the correct intuitionistic translation of \\\"A unless B\\\" is no stronger than \\\"-B -> A\\\". In particular, \\\"unless\\\" is demonstrably weaker than disjunction. I conclude with some observations regarding how this shows that one's choice of logic is methodologically prior to translation from informal natural language to formal systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIALECTICA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIALECTICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48106/dial.v74.i2.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIALECTICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48106/dial.v74.i2.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

考察了“除非”到直觉形式主义的正确翻译。在简要考察了关于“除非”和一般翻译的直觉著作,并仔细考察了Dummett在《直觉主义要素》(1975b)中对“除非”的使用后,我认为“除非B的a”的正确直觉翻译并不强于“-B->a”。特别是,“除非”明显比析取弱。最后,我提出了一些观察,这些观察表明,在从非正式自然语言到正式系统的翻译之前,一个人对逻辑的选择是方法论上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Unless' is 'Or', Unless '¬A Unless A' is Invalid
The proper translation of "unless" into intuitionistic formalisms is examined. After a brief examination of intuitionistic writings on "unless", and on translation in general, and a close examination of Dummett's use of "unless" in Elements of Intuitionism (1975b), I argue that the correct intuitionistic translation of "A unless B" is no stronger than "-B -> A". In particular, "unless" is demonstrably weaker than disjunction. I conclude with some observations regarding how this shows that one's choice of logic is methodologically prior to translation from informal natural language to formal systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIALECTICA
DIALECTICA PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Dialectica publishes first-rate articles predominantly in theoretical and systematic philosophy. It is edited in Switzerland and has a focus on analytical philosophy undertaken on the continent. Continuing the work of its founding members, dialectica seeks a better understanding of the mutual support between science and philosophy that both disciplines need and enjoy in their common search for understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信