智利安全国家的次级犯罪者

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alan McPherson
{"title":"智利安全国家的次级犯罪者","authors":"Alan McPherson","doi":"10.1353/tla.2022.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:What are the experiences in the security state of foot soldiers who do not make key decisions but who implement them—by spying, seducing, detaining, disappearing, torturing, or killing? Are they better understood as victims or perpetrators of human rights violations? Based on research collected in US and Chilean archives on the assassination of Chilean exile Orlando Letelier, killed in Washington in 1976 by the iron-fisted August Pinochet dictatorship, my article addresses this main question by asking about the process of joining, working in, and leaving the security state. It focuses on three specific recruits—Michael Townley, an American-Chilean who built the car bomb that killed Letelier; Armando Fernández, a military man who helped spy on Letelier; and Mónica Lagos, a sex worker who attempted to seduce Letelier. All three worked for DINA, the Chilean secret police, for the Letelier assassination and other assignments. The public nature of the Letelier case—prosecuted to the fullest in both the United States and Chile—produced uniquely deep knowledge of the foot soldiers involved. All joined DINA desperate either for financial rescue or a sense of belonging; once inside DINA, all three found that those desires, patriotic or personal, clashed with the very secrecy of the secret police. They resented what was asked of them as they were kept in the dark. They lost their sense of belonging as their personal desires diverged from those of their employer. Once retired from DINA, all three, regardless of their personal circumstances, felt a deep sense of regret and shame. The article contributes to the historiography of the Chilean security state and to the theory on security states by understanding foot soldiers as \"sub-perpetrators,\" responsible for their actions but operating in a repressive system stifling their options.","PeriodicalId":42355,"journal":{"name":"Latin Americanist","volume":"66 1","pages":"272 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sub-Perpetrators in the Chilean Security State\",\"authors\":\"Alan McPherson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tla.2022.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:What are the experiences in the security state of foot soldiers who do not make key decisions but who implement them—by spying, seducing, detaining, disappearing, torturing, or killing? Are they better understood as victims or perpetrators of human rights violations? Based on research collected in US and Chilean archives on the assassination of Chilean exile Orlando Letelier, killed in Washington in 1976 by the iron-fisted August Pinochet dictatorship, my article addresses this main question by asking about the process of joining, working in, and leaving the security state. It focuses on three specific recruits—Michael Townley, an American-Chilean who built the car bomb that killed Letelier; Armando Fernández, a military man who helped spy on Letelier; and Mónica Lagos, a sex worker who attempted to seduce Letelier. All three worked for DINA, the Chilean secret police, for the Letelier assassination and other assignments. The public nature of the Letelier case—prosecuted to the fullest in both the United States and Chile—produced uniquely deep knowledge of the foot soldiers involved. All joined DINA desperate either for financial rescue or a sense of belonging; once inside DINA, all three found that those desires, patriotic or personal, clashed with the very secrecy of the secret police. They resented what was asked of them as they were kept in the dark. They lost their sense of belonging as their personal desires diverged from those of their employer. Once retired from DINA, all three, regardless of their personal circumstances, felt a deep sense of regret and shame. The article contributes to the historiography of the Chilean security state and to the theory on security states by understanding foot soldiers as \\\"sub-perpetrators,\\\" responsible for their actions but operating in a repressive system stifling their options.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin Americanist\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"272 - 301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin Americanist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tla.2022.0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin Americanist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tla.2022.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:步兵在安全状态下的经历是什么?他们不会做出关键决定,但会执行这些决定——通过间谍、引诱、拘留、失踪、折磨或杀害?他们是被更好地理解为侵犯人权行为的受害者还是肇事者?根据美国和智利档案馆收集的关于1976年在华盛顿被铁腕的奥古斯特·皮诺切特独裁政权杀害的智利流亡人士奥兰多·莱特利耶遇刺的研究,我的文章通过询问加入、工作和离开安全国家的过程来解决这个主要问题。它聚焦于三个特定的新兵——迈克尔·汤利,一个制造了杀害莱特里尔的汽车炸弹的美籍智利人;Armando Fernández,一个帮助侦察Letelier的军人;以及试图引诱莱特利耶的性工作者莫妮卡·拉各斯。三人都曾为智利秘密警察局(DINA)工作,负责莱特里尔暗杀案和其他任务。Letelier案在美国和智利都受到了最充分的起诉,其公开性质使人们对涉案步兵有了独特的深刻了解。所有人都加入了DINA,要么渴望经济救助,要么渴望归属感;一旦进入DINA,三人都发现这些欲望,无论是爱国的还是个人的,都与秘密警察的秘密相冲突。他们被蒙在鼓里,对别人对他们的要求感到不满。他们失去了归属感,因为他们的个人欲望与雇主的欲望不同。从DINA退休后,三人无论个人情况如何,都深感遗憾和羞愧。这篇文章将步兵理解为“次级犯罪者”,对他们的行为负责,但在压制他们选择的镇压制度中运作,为智利安全国家的史学和安全国家理论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sub-Perpetrators in the Chilean Security State
Abstract:What are the experiences in the security state of foot soldiers who do not make key decisions but who implement them—by spying, seducing, detaining, disappearing, torturing, or killing? Are they better understood as victims or perpetrators of human rights violations? Based on research collected in US and Chilean archives on the assassination of Chilean exile Orlando Letelier, killed in Washington in 1976 by the iron-fisted August Pinochet dictatorship, my article addresses this main question by asking about the process of joining, working in, and leaving the security state. It focuses on three specific recruits—Michael Townley, an American-Chilean who built the car bomb that killed Letelier; Armando Fernández, a military man who helped spy on Letelier; and Mónica Lagos, a sex worker who attempted to seduce Letelier. All three worked for DINA, the Chilean secret police, for the Letelier assassination and other assignments. The public nature of the Letelier case—prosecuted to the fullest in both the United States and Chile—produced uniquely deep knowledge of the foot soldiers involved. All joined DINA desperate either for financial rescue or a sense of belonging; once inside DINA, all three found that those desires, patriotic or personal, clashed with the very secrecy of the secret police. They resented what was asked of them as they were kept in the dark. They lost their sense of belonging as their personal desires diverged from those of their employer. Once retired from DINA, all three, regardless of their personal circumstances, felt a deep sense of regret and shame. The article contributes to the historiography of the Chilean security state and to the theory on security states by understanding foot soldiers as "sub-perpetrators," responsible for their actions but operating in a repressive system stifling their options.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Latin Americanist
Latin Americanist HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信