介绍:表征的力量:走向想象的符号学理论

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION

Political Theology Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1462317X.2023.2166684

Antonio Cerella, Arthur Bradley

{"title":"介绍:表征的力量:走向想象的符号学理论","authors":"Antonio Cerella, Arthur Bradley","doi":"10.1080/1462317X.2023.2166684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n This article proposes a semiotic theory of social imaginaries. Drawing on the work of Umberto Eco, Reinhart Koselleck and Martin Heidegger, it shows the logic that governs the relationship between temporality and semiosis, sign and its constant reinterpretation. In this sense, this work can be read as a sort of epistemological program that also represents the background on which the various contributors to this Special Issue have developed their analyses and narratives.","PeriodicalId":43759,"journal":{"name":"Political Theology","volume":"24 1","pages":"1 - 14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: The Power of Representations: Towards a Semiotic Theory of the Imaginary\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Cerella, Arthur Bradley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1462317X.2023.2166684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n This article proposes a semiotic theory of social imaginaries. Drawing on the work of Umberto Eco, Reinhart Koselleck and Martin Heidegger, it shows the logic that governs the relationship between temporality and semiosis, sign and its constant reinterpretation. In this sense, this work can be read as a sort of epistemological program that also represents the background on which the various contributors to this Special Issue have developed their analyses and narratives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Theology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2023.2166684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2023.2166684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种社会想象的符号学理论。它借鉴了翁贝托·艾柯、莱因哈特·科塞莱克和马丁·海德格尔的作品，展示了支配时间性与符号学、符号及其不断重新解释之间关系的逻辑。从这个意义上说，这项工作可以被解读为一种认识论程序，它也代表了本特刊的不同撰稿人发展他们的分析和叙述的背景。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Introduction: The Power of Representations: Towards a Semiotic Theory of the Imaginary

ABSTRACT This article proposes a semiotic theory of social imaginaries. Drawing on the work of Umberto Eco, Reinhart Koselleck and Martin Heidegger, it shows the logic that governs the relationship between temporality and semiosis, sign and its constant reinterpretation. In this sense, this work can be read as a sort of epistemological program that also represents the background on which the various contributors to this Special Issue have developed their analyses and narratives.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Political Theology RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量