{"title":"Groenendaal的异端?从Vanden Twaelf Dogheden看农业自治领对低收入国家的影响","authors":"Ine Kiekens","doi":"10.1080/20465726.2017.1321196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 1329, Pope John XXII promulgated the bull In agro dominico in which he condemned 28 propositions of Meister Eckhart and their further distribution. The Brussels monastery of Groenendaal, where Jan van Ruusbroec and especially Jan van Leeuwen violently rejected Eckhart’s teachings, was long-time considered as the proof that the bull was also read in the Low Countries. However, a recent hypothesis of Satoshi Kikuchi has shown that the exact content of the bull was probably not known in Groenendaal. I aim to contribute to that hypothesis by analysing Vanden twaelf dogheden, a text mainly based on a Middle Dutch adaptation of the Erfurter Reden and most likely written by Godfried Wevel, canon of Groenendaal. I moreover intend to reveal why Ruusbroec and Van Leeuwen rejected any association with Eckhart, even while the reading and possession of Eckhart’s oeuvre in monasteries similar to Groenendaal was not considered problematic.","PeriodicalId":40432,"journal":{"name":"Medieval Mystical Theology","volume":"26 1","pages":"37 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20465726.2017.1321196","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Heretic in Groenendaal? The Impact of In Agro Dominico in the Low Countries in the Light of Vanden Twaelf Dogheden\",\"authors\":\"Ine Kiekens\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20465726.2017.1321196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In 1329, Pope John XXII promulgated the bull In agro dominico in which he condemned 28 propositions of Meister Eckhart and their further distribution. The Brussels monastery of Groenendaal, where Jan van Ruusbroec and especially Jan van Leeuwen violently rejected Eckhart’s teachings, was long-time considered as the proof that the bull was also read in the Low Countries. However, a recent hypothesis of Satoshi Kikuchi has shown that the exact content of the bull was probably not known in Groenendaal. I aim to contribute to that hypothesis by analysing Vanden twaelf dogheden, a text mainly based on a Middle Dutch adaptation of the Erfurter Reden and most likely written by Godfried Wevel, canon of Groenendaal. I moreover intend to reveal why Ruusbroec and Van Leeuwen rejected any association with Eckhart, even while the reading and possession of Eckhart’s oeuvre in monasteries similar to Groenendaal was not considered problematic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20465726.2017.1321196\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2017.1321196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medieval Mystical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2017.1321196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要1329年,教宗若望二十二世颁布了《农牧业宣言》,谴责了埃克哈特的28项主张及其进一步传播。布鲁塞尔Groenendaal修道院,Jan van Ruusbroec,尤其是Jan van Leeuwen在那里暴力拒绝了Eckhart的教义,长期以来被认为是低地国家也阅读公牛的证据。然而,菊池聪最近的一项假设表明,在Groenendaal,公牛的确切含量可能并不清楚。我的目的是通过分析《范登》(Vanden twelf-dogheden)来为这一假设做出贡献,这本书主要基于中荷语改编的《埃尔福特·雷登》(Erfurter Reden),很可能是由格罗恩达尔(Groenendaal)的正典戈德弗里德·韦维尔(Godfried Wevel)撰写的。此外,我还打算揭示为什么鲁斯布罗克和范·列文拒绝与埃克哈特有任何联系,尽管在类似于格罗恩达尔的修道院中阅读和拥有埃克哈特的全部作品并不被认为是有问题的。
A Heretic in Groenendaal? The Impact of In Agro Dominico in the Low Countries in the Light of Vanden Twaelf Dogheden
ABSTRACT In 1329, Pope John XXII promulgated the bull In agro dominico in which he condemned 28 propositions of Meister Eckhart and their further distribution. The Brussels monastery of Groenendaal, where Jan van Ruusbroec and especially Jan van Leeuwen violently rejected Eckhart’s teachings, was long-time considered as the proof that the bull was also read in the Low Countries. However, a recent hypothesis of Satoshi Kikuchi has shown that the exact content of the bull was probably not known in Groenendaal. I aim to contribute to that hypothesis by analysing Vanden twaelf dogheden, a text mainly based on a Middle Dutch adaptation of the Erfurter Reden and most likely written by Godfried Wevel, canon of Groenendaal. I moreover intend to reveal why Ruusbroec and Van Leeuwen rejected any association with Eckhart, even while the reading and possession of Eckhart’s oeuvre in monasteries similar to Groenendaal was not considered problematic.