将跟踪与海上调查相结合,以改善秘鲁两种受威胁海鸟的发生和分布估计

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
J. Fischer, S. Bose, Cynthia Romero, M. Charteris, P. Crowe, G. Parker, S. Ray, K. Rexer-Huber, P. Sagar, D. Thompson, Elizabeth A Bell, I. Debski, J. Quiñones
{"title":"将跟踪与海上调查相结合,以改善秘鲁两种受威胁海鸟的发生和分布估计","authors":"J. Fischer, S. Bose, Cynthia Romero, M. Charteris, P. Crowe, G. Parker, S. Ray, K. Rexer-Huber, P. Sagar, D. Thompson, Elizabeth A Bell, I. Debski, J. Quiñones","doi":"10.1017/S0959270922000442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Seabirds are highly threatened, including by fisheries bycatch. Accurate understanding of offshore distribution of seabirds is crucial to address this threat. Tracking technologies revolutionised insights into seabird distributions but tracking data may contain a variety of biases. We tracked two threatened seabirds (Salvin’s Albatross Thalassarche salvini n = 60 and Black Petrel Procellaria parkinsoni n = 46) from their breeding colonies in Aotearoa (New Zealand) to their non-breeding grounds in South America, including Peru, while simultaneously completing seven surveys in Peruvian waters. We then used species distribution models to predict occurrence and distribution using either data source alone, and both data sources combined. Results showed seasonal differences between estimates of occurrence and distribution when using data sources independently. Combining data resulted in more balanced insights into occurrence and distributions, and reduced uncertainty. Most notably, both species were predicted to occur in Peruvian waters during all four annual quarters: the northern Humboldt upwelling system for Salvin’s Albatross and northern continental shelf waters for Black Petrels. Our results highlighted that relying on a single data source may introduce biases into distribution estimates. Our tracking data might have contained ontological and/or colony-related biases (e.g. only breeding adults from one colony were tracked), while our survey data might have contained spatiotemporal biases (e.g. surveys were limited to waters <200 nm from the coast). We recommend combining data sources wherever possible to refine predictions of species distributions, which ultimately will improve fisheries bycatch management through better spatiotemporal understanding of risks.","PeriodicalId":9275,"journal":{"name":"Bird Conservation International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining tracking with at-sea surveys to improve occurrence and distribution estimates of two threatened seabirds in Peru\",\"authors\":\"J. Fischer, S. Bose, Cynthia Romero, M. Charteris, P. Crowe, G. Parker, S. Ray, K. Rexer-Huber, P. Sagar, D. Thompson, Elizabeth A Bell, I. Debski, J. Quiñones\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0959270922000442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Seabirds are highly threatened, including by fisheries bycatch. Accurate understanding of offshore distribution of seabirds is crucial to address this threat. Tracking technologies revolutionised insights into seabird distributions but tracking data may contain a variety of biases. We tracked two threatened seabirds (Salvin’s Albatross Thalassarche salvini n = 60 and Black Petrel Procellaria parkinsoni n = 46) from their breeding colonies in Aotearoa (New Zealand) to their non-breeding grounds in South America, including Peru, while simultaneously completing seven surveys in Peruvian waters. We then used species distribution models to predict occurrence and distribution using either data source alone, and both data sources combined. Results showed seasonal differences between estimates of occurrence and distribution when using data sources independently. Combining data resulted in more balanced insights into occurrence and distributions, and reduced uncertainty. Most notably, both species were predicted to occur in Peruvian waters during all four annual quarters: the northern Humboldt upwelling system for Salvin’s Albatross and northern continental shelf waters for Black Petrels. Our results highlighted that relying on a single data source may introduce biases into distribution estimates. Our tracking data might have contained ontological and/or colony-related biases (e.g. only breeding adults from one colony were tracked), while our survey data might have contained spatiotemporal biases (e.g. surveys were limited to waters <200 nm from the coast). We recommend combining data sources wherever possible to refine predictions of species distributions, which ultimately will improve fisheries bycatch management through better spatiotemporal understanding of risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bird Conservation International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bird Conservation International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270922000442\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bird Conservation International","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270922000442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海鸟受到包括渔获物在内的高度威胁。准确了解海鸟的近海分布对应对这一威胁至关重要。追踪技术彻底改变了人们对海鸟分布的认识,但追踪数据可能包含各种偏差。我们跟踪了两种濒临灭绝的海鸟(salin 's Albatross Thalassarche salvini n = 60)和黑海燕(Black petraria parkinsoni n = 46),从它们在新西兰奥特罗阿(Aotearoa)的繁殖地到南美洲(包括秘鲁)的非繁殖地,同时在秘鲁水域完成了7项调查。然后,我们使用物种分布模型来预测发生和分布,其中一个数据源单独使用,两个数据源结合使用。结果显示,当独立使用数据源时,估计的发生和分布之间存在季节性差异。结合数据可以更平衡地了解发生和分布情况,并减少不确定性。最值得注意的是,这两种物种都被预测在秘鲁水域全年四个季度都有出现:洪堡北部上升流系统中有信天翁,北部大陆架水域中有黑海燕。我们的结果强调,依赖单一数据源可能会在分布估计中引入偏差。我们的跟踪数据可能包含本体学和/或群体相关的偏差(例如,只跟踪了一个群体的繁殖成虫),而我们的调查数据可能包含时空偏差(例如,调查仅限于距离海岸<200海里的水域)。我们建议尽可能结合数据来源,以完善物种分布的预测,最终通过更好地了解风险的时空,改善渔业副渔获物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining tracking with at-sea surveys to improve occurrence and distribution estimates of two threatened seabirds in Peru
Summary Seabirds are highly threatened, including by fisheries bycatch. Accurate understanding of offshore distribution of seabirds is crucial to address this threat. Tracking technologies revolutionised insights into seabird distributions but tracking data may contain a variety of biases. We tracked two threatened seabirds (Salvin’s Albatross Thalassarche salvini n = 60 and Black Petrel Procellaria parkinsoni n = 46) from their breeding colonies in Aotearoa (New Zealand) to their non-breeding grounds in South America, including Peru, while simultaneously completing seven surveys in Peruvian waters. We then used species distribution models to predict occurrence and distribution using either data source alone, and both data sources combined. Results showed seasonal differences between estimates of occurrence and distribution when using data sources independently. Combining data resulted in more balanced insights into occurrence and distributions, and reduced uncertainty. Most notably, both species were predicted to occur in Peruvian waters during all four annual quarters: the northern Humboldt upwelling system for Salvin’s Albatross and northern continental shelf waters for Black Petrels. Our results highlighted that relying on a single data source may introduce biases into distribution estimates. Our tracking data might have contained ontological and/or colony-related biases (e.g. only breeding adults from one colony were tracked), while our survey data might have contained spatiotemporal biases (e.g. surveys were limited to waters <200 nm from the coast). We recommend combining data sources wherever possible to refine predictions of species distributions, which ultimately will improve fisheries bycatch management through better spatiotemporal understanding of risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bird Conservation International is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that seeks to promote worldwide research and action for the conservation of birds and the habitats upon which they depend. The official journal of BirdLife International, it provides stimulating, international and up-to-date coverage of a broad range of conservation topics, using birds to illuminate wider issues of biodiversity, conservation and sustainable resource use. It publishes original papers and reviews, including targeted articles and recommendations by leading experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信