既有钢质铁路桥梁的极限和疲劳极限状态——具有历史钢材和连接类型的LRFD

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Kroyer, A. Taras
{"title":"既有钢质铁路桥梁的极限和疲劳极限状态——具有历史钢材和连接类型的LRFD","authors":"R. Kroyer, A. Taras","doi":"10.1002/stco.202200042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of the load‐bearing capacity and fatigue strength of existing railway bridges has been playing an increasingly important role in the infrastructure management of railway operators for several years now. Currently, many bridge structures have been in operation longer than it was foreseen during their planning and construction. In addition, the axle loads on many lines, as well as the demands on the reliability of the verification results, have steadily increased. As the material properties and construction techniques in existing structures differ to some extent from nowadays structures, e.g., riveting instead of welding, it is important to provide engineers and operators with recommendations for the assessment of existing steel bridges. This article summarises the studies conducted as part of a research project initiated by Deutsche Bahn Netz AG for possible updates to DB RiL 805, which is used for the verification of railway bridges in the Deutsche Bahn (DB) network. The studies concerned the transition of verification concepts against static and fatigue loads used in the past to limit state verifications with partial safety factors in accordance with the Eurocodes. While initially related to an upgrade of a specific operator's design recommendation, the findings in this article are of more general nature and could form the basis for similar developments of recommendations for the assessment of existing, riveted structures independently throughout Europe.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultimate and fatigue limit states of existing steel railway bridges – \\nLRFD with historical steel products and connection types\",\"authors\":\"R. Kroyer, A. Taras\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/stco.202200042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The assessment of the load‐bearing capacity and fatigue strength of existing railway bridges has been playing an increasingly important role in the infrastructure management of railway operators for several years now. Currently, many bridge structures have been in operation longer than it was foreseen during their planning and construction. In addition, the axle loads on many lines, as well as the demands on the reliability of the verification results, have steadily increased. As the material properties and construction techniques in existing structures differ to some extent from nowadays structures, e.g., riveting instead of welding, it is important to provide engineers and operators with recommendations for the assessment of existing steel bridges. This article summarises the studies conducted as part of a research project initiated by Deutsche Bahn Netz AG for possible updates to DB RiL 805, which is used for the verification of railway bridges in the Deutsche Bahn (DB) network. The studies concerned the transition of verification concepts against static and fatigue loads used in the past to limit state verifications with partial safety factors in accordance with the Eurocodes. While initially related to an upgrade of a specific operator's design recommendation, the findings in this article are of more general nature and could form the basis for similar developments of recommendations for the assessment of existing, riveted structures independently throughout Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.202200042\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.202200042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,既有铁路桥梁的承载能力和疲劳强度评估在铁路运营企业的基础设施管理中发挥着越来越重要的作用。目前,许多桥梁结构的使用时间超过了其规划和建设期间的预期。此外,许多线路上的轴载荷以及对验证结果可靠性的要求也在稳步增加。由于既有结构的材料性能和施工技术与现在的结构有一定的不同,例如铆接而不是焊接,因此为工程师和操作人员提供评估既有钢桥的建议是很重要的。本文总结了作为德国铁路网络公司(Deutsche Bahn Netz AG)发起的一项研究项目的一部分所进行的研究,该项目旨在对DB RiL 805进行可能的更新,该研究用于验证德国铁路(DB)网络中的铁路桥梁。这些研究涉及过去用于根据欧洲规范限制部分安全系数的状态核查的针对静态和疲劳载荷的核查概念的转变。虽然最初与特定运营商的设计建议升级有关,但本文的研究结果具有更普遍的性质,可以为欧洲现有铆接结构独立评估的类似建议发展提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultimate and fatigue limit states of existing steel railway bridges – LRFD with historical steel products and connection types
The assessment of the load‐bearing capacity and fatigue strength of existing railway bridges has been playing an increasingly important role in the infrastructure management of railway operators for several years now. Currently, many bridge structures have been in operation longer than it was foreseen during their planning and construction. In addition, the axle loads on many lines, as well as the demands on the reliability of the verification results, have steadily increased. As the material properties and construction techniques in existing structures differ to some extent from nowadays structures, e.g., riveting instead of welding, it is important to provide engineers and operators with recommendations for the assessment of existing steel bridges. This article summarises the studies conducted as part of a research project initiated by Deutsche Bahn Netz AG for possible updates to DB RiL 805, which is used for the verification of railway bridges in the Deutsche Bahn (DB) network. The studies concerned the transition of verification concepts against static and fatigue loads used in the past to limit state verifications with partial safety factors in accordance with the Eurocodes. While initially related to an upgrade of a specific operator's design recommendation, the findings in this article are of more general nature and could form the basis for similar developments of recommendations for the assessment of existing, riveted structures independently throughout Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信