{"title":"新媒体环境下以社区为中心的新闻研究","authors":"Amanda B. Womac","doi":"10.1177/19312431221149703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inspired by the Hutchins’ Commission 1947 report on the freedom of the press, Fred Siebert, Theodore Peterson, and Wilbur Schramm explored the concept of a socially responsible press. Their work to develop the social responsibility theory of media set the stage for 50 years of a theory that holds that the press while enjoying a “privileged position under our government, is obliged to be responsible to society for carrying out certain essential functions of mass communication in contemporary society” (Seibert et al., 1956). The basic premise is that the media have a responsibility to the public, and to an extent democracy, to provide a platform for discourse. In the more than half a decade since the publication of Four Theories, the media landscape has changed, drastically (Bagdikian, 2004). Media became a commodity and the highest bidder won the prize. Social media opened the flood gates for anyone with access to Internet and the idea to voice it. Traditional media outlets are no longer the main source of news for most Americans who use a blend of traditional and new sources to get their information (Pew, 2011). With these dramatic changes, does social responsibility still have a place in the media landscape? Adams-Bloom and Cleary (2009) claim that “although the paradigm shift has occurred, the theoretical writing has not kept pace with the modern reality” (p. 2) and propose a framework based on stakeholder theory to explain the current media landscape—a dual responsibility model—which “allows for an acknowledgment of the financial side of the media business while preserving the editorial integrity that has traditionally been at the root of social responsibility theory” (p. 7). This model focuses on the marketplace and the media outlets, but where are the journalists and the communities they serve? Wenzel (2020) offers another framework that is based on communication infrastructure theory and focuses on building trust between residents, local media outlets, and Book Review","PeriodicalId":29929,"journal":{"name":"Electronic News","volume":"17 1","pages":"133 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considering Community-Centered Journalism in the New Media Landscape\",\"authors\":\"Amanda B. Womac\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19312431221149703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inspired by the Hutchins’ Commission 1947 report on the freedom of the press, Fred Siebert, Theodore Peterson, and Wilbur Schramm explored the concept of a socially responsible press. Their work to develop the social responsibility theory of media set the stage for 50 years of a theory that holds that the press while enjoying a “privileged position under our government, is obliged to be responsible to society for carrying out certain essential functions of mass communication in contemporary society” (Seibert et al., 1956). The basic premise is that the media have a responsibility to the public, and to an extent democracy, to provide a platform for discourse. In the more than half a decade since the publication of Four Theories, the media landscape has changed, drastically (Bagdikian, 2004). Media became a commodity and the highest bidder won the prize. Social media opened the flood gates for anyone with access to Internet and the idea to voice it. Traditional media outlets are no longer the main source of news for most Americans who use a blend of traditional and new sources to get their information (Pew, 2011). With these dramatic changes, does social responsibility still have a place in the media landscape? Adams-Bloom and Cleary (2009) claim that “although the paradigm shift has occurred, the theoretical writing has not kept pace with the modern reality” (p. 2) and propose a framework based on stakeholder theory to explain the current media landscape—a dual responsibility model—which “allows for an acknowledgment of the financial side of the media business while preserving the editorial integrity that has traditionally been at the root of social responsibility theory” (p. 7). This model focuses on the marketplace and the media outlets, but where are the journalists and the communities they serve? Wenzel (2020) offers another framework that is based on communication infrastructure theory and focuses on building trust between residents, local media outlets, and Book Review\",\"PeriodicalId\":29929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic News\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"133 - 136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431221149703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431221149703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
受1947年哈钦斯委员会关于新闻自由的报告的启发,弗雷德·西伯特、西奥多·彼得森和威尔伯·施拉姆探索了对社会负责的新闻的概念。他们发展媒体社会责任理论的工作为一种理论奠定了50年的基础,该理论认为,新闻界在享有“我们政府的特权地位的同时,有义务对社会负责,在当代社会中履行大众传播的某些基本功能”(Seibert et al., 1956)。其基本前提是,媒体对公众负有责任,并在一定程度上实现民主,为言论提供平台。在《四大理论》出版后的五年多时间里,媒体格局发生了巨大的变化(Bagdikian, 2004)。媒体成了一种商品,出价最高的人就能得奖。社交媒体为所有能上网并有想法的人打开了闸门。传统媒体渠道不再是大多数美国人的主要新闻来源,他们使用传统和新来源的混合来获取信息(皮尤,2011)。随着这些戏剧性的变化,社会责任在媒体领域还有一席之地吗?Adams-Bloom和Cleary(2009)声称“尽管范式转变已经发生,理论写作没有跟上现代现实”(第2页),并提出了一个基于利益相关者理论的框架来解释当前的媒体格局——双重责任模型,该模型“允许承认媒体业务的财务方面,同时保留传统上作为社会责任理论基础的编辑完整性”(第7页)。该模型关注市场和媒体渠道。但记者和他们服务的社区在哪里?Wenzel(2020)提供了另一个基于通信基础设施理论的框架,重点是在居民、当地媒体和书评之间建立信任
Considering Community-Centered Journalism in the New Media Landscape
Inspired by the Hutchins’ Commission 1947 report on the freedom of the press, Fred Siebert, Theodore Peterson, and Wilbur Schramm explored the concept of a socially responsible press. Their work to develop the social responsibility theory of media set the stage for 50 years of a theory that holds that the press while enjoying a “privileged position under our government, is obliged to be responsible to society for carrying out certain essential functions of mass communication in contemporary society” (Seibert et al., 1956). The basic premise is that the media have a responsibility to the public, and to an extent democracy, to provide a platform for discourse. In the more than half a decade since the publication of Four Theories, the media landscape has changed, drastically (Bagdikian, 2004). Media became a commodity and the highest bidder won the prize. Social media opened the flood gates for anyone with access to Internet and the idea to voice it. Traditional media outlets are no longer the main source of news for most Americans who use a blend of traditional and new sources to get their information (Pew, 2011). With these dramatic changes, does social responsibility still have a place in the media landscape? Adams-Bloom and Cleary (2009) claim that “although the paradigm shift has occurred, the theoretical writing has not kept pace with the modern reality” (p. 2) and propose a framework based on stakeholder theory to explain the current media landscape—a dual responsibility model—which “allows for an acknowledgment of the financial side of the media business while preserving the editorial integrity that has traditionally been at the root of social responsibility theory” (p. 7). This model focuses on the marketplace and the media outlets, but where are the journalists and the communities they serve? Wenzel (2020) offers another framework that is based on communication infrastructure theory and focuses on building trust between residents, local media outlets, and Book Review