Sara C. McDaniel, Laci Watkins, Jason C. Chow, Megan Fedewa, Sharon Nemer
{"title":"应对能力的系统文献回顾与元分析:对实施的影响与启示","authors":"Sara C. McDaniel, Laci Watkins, Jason C. Chow, Megan Fedewa, Sharon Nemer","doi":"10.1080/15377903.2023.2196946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Coping Power (CP) is an evidence-based intervention that reduces externalizing behaviors in students who are identified as aggressive or disruptive. CP is based on a cognitive-behavioral model and involves child-focused group sessions and parent-focused sessions. A large body of research has demonstrated the effectiveness of CP, but to date there has not been a systematic review or meta-analysis of published CP studies. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review examining the characteristics, methodological rigor, and social validity of CP studies and to conduct a selective meta-analysis to examine the effects of CP across studies and to identify potential moderators of intervention effectiveness. The 21 studies included in the review indicate that the CP intervention is supported by rigorous research, effectively reduces maladaptive behavior, and has demonstrated multiple indicators of social validity. A selective meta-analysis of 12 studies indicates that CP has resulted in small to moderate reductions in externalizing behavior, although these findings were not statistically significant. Intervention dosage, agent, and parent/caregiverparticipation did not moderate effects. Limitations, implications for future research, and recommendations for clinical practice are provided.","PeriodicalId":46345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Coping Power: Effects and Implications for Implementation\",\"authors\":\"Sara C. McDaniel, Laci Watkins, Jason C. Chow, Megan Fedewa, Sharon Nemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15377903.2023.2196946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Coping Power (CP) is an evidence-based intervention that reduces externalizing behaviors in students who are identified as aggressive or disruptive. CP is based on a cognitive-behavioral model and involves child-focused group sessions and parent-focused sessions. A large body of research has demonstrated the effectiveness of CP, but to date there has not been a systematic review or meta-analysis of published CP studies. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review examining the characteristics, methodological rigor, and social validity of CP studies and to conduct a selective meta-analysis to examine the effects of CP across studies and to identify potential moderators of intervention effectiveness. The 21 studies included in the review indicate that the CP intervention is supported by rigorous research, effectively reduces maladaptive behavior, and has demonstrated multiple indicators of social validity. A selective meta-analysis of 12 studies indicates that CP has resulted in small to moderate reductions in externalizing behavior, although these findings were not statistically significant. Intervention dosage, agent, and parent/caregiverparticipation did not moderate effects. Limitations, implications for future research, and recommendations for clinical practice are provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied School Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2023.2196946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2023.2196946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Coping Power: Effects and Implications for Implementation
Abstract Coping Power (CP) is an evidence-based intervention that reduces externalizing behaviors in students who are identified as aggressive or disruptive. CP is based on a cognitive-behavioral model and involves child-focused group sessions and parent-focused sessions. A large body of research has demonstrated the effectiveness of CP, but to date there has not been a systematic review or meta-analysis of published CP studies. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review examining the characteristics, methodological rigor, and social validity of CP studies and to conduct a selective meta-analysis to examine the effects of CP across studies and to identify potential moderators of intervention effectiveness. The 21 studies included in the review indicate that the CP intervention is supported by rigorous research, effectively reduces maladaptive behavior, and has demonstrated multiple indicators of social validity. A selective meta-analysis of 12 studies indicates that CP has resulted in small to moderate reductions in externalizing behavior, although these findings were not statistically significant. Intervention dosage, agent, and parent/caregiverparticipation did not moderate effects. Limitations, implications for future research, and recommendations for clinical practice are provided.
期刊介绍:
With a new publisher (Taylor & Francis) and a new editor (David L. Wodrich), the Journal of Applied School Psychology will continue to publish articles and periodic thematic issues in 2009. Each submission should rest on either solid theoretical or empirical support and provide information that can be used in applied school settings, related educational systems, or community locations in which practitioners work. Manuscripts appropriate for publication in the journal will reflect psychological applications that pertain to individual students, groups of students, teachers, parents, and administrators. The journal also seeks, over time, novel and creative ways in which to disseminate information about practically sound and empirically supported school psychology practice.