{"title":"十八和十九世纪的教学","authors":"Kevin Hilliard, Astrid Köhler, Charlotte I. Lee","doi":"10.1080/09593683.2022.2074408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chronological spread of what is taught in German Departments in the UK and Ireland has contracted over the years. Once central areas — Aufklärung, Sturm und Drang, Weimarer Klassik, Romanticism, nineteenth-century poetry and fiction— have become marginal. At the same time, the disciplinary outlook has widened. An exclusive focus on literature has given way, in most Departments, to an approach encompassing aspects of cultural and social history, as well as the newer medium of film. There is nothing unnatural or unhealthy about these developments; on the contrary. The needs of our undergraduates and the compelling drama of twentieth-century German history have been powerful drivers of change. Film— the only art invented after antiquity— was scandalously ignored for many decades, and now has its rightful place in the curriculum. Cultural and social history have reinvigorated literary studies, as well as claiming an interest in their own right. The point of raising the status of eighteenthand nineteenth-century literature in our teaching, therefore, is not to hark back to a golden age. It is to ask, instead, what, in this new context, the rich resources of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries can add to what we teach, not in isolation, but in dialogue with contemporary culture, and as a window onto a deeper German(-speaking) past. It is worth raising the question from the point of view of the profession, too. The developments outlined above have widened the gap between British and Irish German Studies on the one hand — or Auslandsgermanistik more generally — and Inlandsgermanistik on the other. Bringing the eighteenth and nineteenth century back into focus would also be a way of keeping open lines of dialogue with our colleagues in the German-speaking countries. It is perhaps worth remembering how significantly distinguished British and Irish Germanists have contributed to the study of these areas in the past. Carrying that tradition forward into the present and future is a legitimate aspiration for the English Goethe Society. This issue derives from discussions on a special panel, sponsored by the EGS, at the 2021 conference of the Association of German Studies. The panel comprised British and Irish Germanists, together with German Germanisten with experience of teaching in the British system. We sought, therefore, to","PeriodicalId":40789,"journal":{"name":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Hilliard, Astrid Köhler, Charlotte I. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593683.2022.2074408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chronological spread of what is taught in German Departments in the UK and Ireland has contracted over the years. Once central areas — Aufklärung, Sturm und Drang, Weimarer Klassik, Romanticism, nineteenth-century poetry and fiction— have become marginal. At the same time, the disciplinary outlook has widened. An exclusive focus on literature has given way, in most Departments, to an approach encompassing aspects of cultural and social history, as well as the newer medium of film. There is nothing unnatural or unhealthy about these developments; on the contrary. The needs of our undergraduates and the compelling drama of twentieth-century German history have been powerful drivers of change. Film— the only art invented after antiquity— was scandalously ignored for many decades, and now has its rightful place in the curriculum. Cultural and social history have reinvigorated literary studies, as well as claiming an interest in their own right. The point of raising the status of eighteenthand nineteenth-century literature in our teaching, therefore, is not to hark back to a golden age. It is to ask, instead, what, in this new context, the rich resources of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries can add to what we teach, not in isolation, but in dialogue with contemporary culture, and as a window onto a deeper German(-speaking) past. It is worth raising the question from the point of view of the profession, too. The developments outlined above have widened the gap between British and Irish German Studies on the one hand — or Auslandsgermanistik more generally — and Inlandsgermanistik on the other. Bringing the eighteenth and nineteenth century back into focus would also be a way of keeping open lines of dialogue with our colleagues in the German-speaking countries. It is perhaps worth remembering how significantly distinguished British and Irish Germanists have contributed to the study of these areas in the past. Carrying that tradition forward into the present and future is a legitimate aspiration for the English Goethe Society. This issue derives from discussions on a special panel, sponsored by the EGS, at the 2021 conference of the Association of German Studies. The panel comprised British and Irish Germanists, together with German Germanisten with experience of teaching in the British system. We sought, therefore, to\",\"PeriodicalId\":40789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Publications of the English Goethe Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Publications of the English Goethe Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2022.2074408\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2022.2074408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这些年来,在英国和爱尔兰的德语系中,教学内容的时间顺序一直在缩小。曾经的中心领域——Aufklärung、Sturm und Drang、魏玛古典音乐、浪漫主义、19世纪诗歌和小说——已经变得边缘化。与此同时,学科视野也拓宽了。在大多数院系中,对文学的专门关注已经让位于涵盖文化和社会历史各个方面以及电影这一较新的媒介的方法。这些发展并不是不自然或不健康的;恰恰相反。我们本科生的需求和二十世纪德国历史的引人注目的戏剧已经成为变革的强大驱动力。电影——唯一一门在古代之后发明的艺术——在几十年里被可耻地忽视了,现在在课程中有了它应有的位置。文化和社会历史为文学研究注入了新的活力,同时也对文学研究本身产生了兴趣。因此,提高十八、十九世纪文学在我们教学中的地位,并不是要回到一个黄金时代。相反,我们要问的是,在这个新的背景下,18世纪和19世纪的丰富资源可以为我们的教学增添什么,不是孤立地,而是与当代文化对话,并作为一扇通往更深层次的德语(讲德语的)过去的窗口。从专业的角度提出这个问题也是值得的。以上概述的发展扩大了英国和爱尔兰德语研究(或者更广泛地说,是澳大利亚日耳曼学)和内陆日耳曼学之间的差距。把18和19世纪重新纳入焦点,也将是与我们在德语国家的同事保持开放对话的一种方式。也许值得记住的是,英国和爱尔兰的德国学者在过去对这些领域的研究做出了多么显著的贡献。将这一传统延续到现在和未来,是英国歌德协会的一个合理愿望。这一问题源于德国研究协会2021年会议上由EGS赞助的一个特别小组的讨论。小组成员包括英国和爱尔兰的德国人,以及在英国体系中有教学经验的德国人。因此,我们设法
The chronological spread of what is taught in German Departments in the UK and Ireland has contracted over the years. Once central areas — Aufklärung, Sturm und Drang, Weimarer Klassik, Romanticism, nineteenth-century poetry and fiction— have become marginal. At the same time, the disciplinary outlook has widened. An exclusive focus on literature has given way, in most Departments, to an approach encompassing aspects of cultural and social history, as well as the newer medium of film. There is nothing unnatural or unhealthy about these developments; on the contrary. The needs of our undergraduates and the compelling drama of twentieth-century German history have been powerful drivers of change. Film— the only art invented after antiquity— was scandalously ignored for many decades, and now has its rightful place in the curriculum. Cultural and social history have reinvigorated literary studies, as well as claiming an interest in their own right. The point of raising the status of eighteenthand nineteenth-century literature in our teaching, therefore, is not to hark back to a golden age. It is to ask, instead, what, in this new context, the rich resources of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries can add to what we teach, not in isolation, but in dialogue with contemporary culture, and as a window onto a deeper German(-speaking) past. It is worth raising the question from the point of view of the profession, too. The developments outlined above have widened the gap between British and Irish German Studies on the one hand — or Auslandsgermanistik more generally — and Inlandsgermanistik on the other. Bringing the eighteenth and nineteenth century back into focus would also be a way of keeping open lines of dialogue with our colleagues in the German-speaking countries. It is perhaps worth remembering how significantly distinguished British and Irish Germanists have contributed to the study of these areas in the past. Carrying that tradition forward into the present and future is a legitimate aspiration for the English Goethe Society. This issue derives from discussions on a special panel, sponsored by the EGS, at the 2021 conference of the Association of German Studies. The panel comprised British and Irish Germanists, together with German Germanisten with experience of teaching in the British system. We sought, therefore, to