安全通信、乘客对飞行前安全检查的意识和满意度之间的关系研究

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Yin-Long Pai, Shiou-Yu Chen, Kung-Don Ye
{"title":"安全通信、乘客对飞行前安全检查的意识和满意度之间的关系研究","authors":"Yin-Long Pai, Shiou-Yu Chen, Kung-Don Ye","doi":"10.1080/24721840.2021.1885980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: This study proposes the conceptual framework to verify the relationship among preflight security communications and passengers’ awareness of dangerous goods and satisfaction of security checks. Background: All air transport stakeholders strive to ensure aviation’s safety and security. As key players, airlines and airports must comply with International Air Transport Association and International Civil Aviation Organization regulations, so they usually establish strict security mechanisms to prevent possible accidents resulting from passengers bringing dangerous goods on board. However, excessive or unnecessary security checks often cause inconvenience for passengers, who are dissatisfied with security checks and may be discouraged from flying again. Method: With 300 valid questionnaires collected from domestic route passengers in Taiwan, analysis of variance and structural equation modeling were conducted to explore the differences in the passengers’ awareness of dangerous goods and the impacts of security communications and awareness of dangerous goods on the satisfaction with the security checks. Results: Older and retired passengers are prone to have relatively low awareness about dangerous goods. Among the 3 types of preflight security communications, counter and website communications had stronger impacts on passengers’ satisfaction of security checks. Conclusion: This research built a research framework on security communication, awareness of dangerous goods, and satisfaction of security checks for aviation operators and administrative authorities to design more effective security communication methods to improve aviation safety and security.","PeriodicalId":41693,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24721840.2021.1885980","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Relationships Among Security Communications, Passenger’s Awareness and Satisfaction Toward Preflight Security Checks\",\"authors\":\"Yin-Long Pai, Shiou-Yu Chen, Kung-Don Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24721840.2021.1885980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective: This study proposes the conceptual framework to verify the relationship among preflight security communications and passengers’ awareness of dangerous goods and satisfaction of security checks. Background: All air transport stakeholders strive to ensure aviation’s safety and security. As key players, airlines and airports must comply with International Air Transport Association and International Civil Aviation Organization regulations, so they usually establish strict security mechanisms to prevent possible accidents resulting from passengers bringing dangerous goods on board. However, excessive or unnecessary security checks often cause inconvenience for passengers, who are dissatisfied with security checks and may be discouraged from flying again. Method: With 300 valid questionnaires collected from domestic route passengers in Taiwan, analysis of variance and structural equation modeling were conducted to explore the differences in the passengers’ awareness of dangerous goods and the impacts of security communications and awareness of dangerous goods on the satisfaction with the security checks. Results: Older and retired passengers are prone to have relatively low awareness about dangerous goods. Among the 3 types of preflight security communications, counter and website communications had stronger impacts on passengers’ satisfaction of security checks. Conclusion: This research built a research framework on security communication, awareness of dangerous goods, and satisfaction of security checks for aviation operators and administrative authorities to design more effective security communication methods to improve aviation safety and security.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24721840.2021.1885980\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2021.1885980\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aerospace Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2021.1885980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:本研究提出概念框架,验证飞行前安全沟通与旅客危险品意识和安检满意度之间的关系。背景:所有航空运输利益相关者都努力确保航空安全。作为主要参与者,航空公司和机场必须遵守国际航空运输协会和国际民用航空组织的规定,因此他们通常建立严格的安全机制,以防止乘客携带危险物品登机可能发生的事故。然而,过多或不必要的安检往往会给乘客带来不便,他们对安检感到不满,可能会打消再次乘坐飞机的念头。方法:以台湾国内航线旅客为调查对象,收集有效问卷300份,运用方差分析和结构方程模型,探讨旅客危险物品认知的差异,以及安全沟通和危险物品认知对安检满意度的影响。结果:高龄及退休旅客危险品意识相对较低。在3种飞行前安检通信中,柜台和网站通信对旅客安检满意度的影响更大。结论:本研究构建了航空经营人与管理部门安全沟通、危险品意识、安检满意度的研究框架,旨在设计更有效的安全沟通方式,提高航空安全保障水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Relationships Among Security Communications, Passenger’s Awareness and Satisfaction Toward Preflight Security Checks
ABSTRACT Objective: This study proposes the conceptual framework to verify the relationship among preflight security communications and passengers’ awareness of dangerous goods and satisfaction of security checks. Background: All air transport stakeholders strive to ensure aviation’s safety and security. As key players, airlines and airports must comply with International Air Transport Association and International Civil Aviation Organization regulations, so they usually establish strict security mechanisms to prevent possible accidents resulting from passengers bringing dangerous goods on board. However, excessive or unnecessary security checks often cause inconvenience for passengers, who are dissatisfied with security checks and may be discouraged from flying again. Method: With 300 valid questionnaires collected from domestic route passengers in Taiwan, analysis of variance and structural equation modeling were conducted to explore the differences in the passengers’ awareness of dangerous goods and the impacts of security communications and awareness of dangerous goods on the satisfaction with the security checks. Results: Older and retired passengers are prone to have relatively low awareness about dangerous goods. Among the 3 types of preflight security communications, counter and website communications had stronger impacts on passengers’ satisfaction of security checks. Conclusion: This research built a research framework on security communication, awareness of dangerous goods, and satisfaction of security checks for aviation operators and administrative authorities to design more effective security communication methods to improve aviation safety and security.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信