{"title":"坏的,好的,丑的","authors":"Geir O. Rønning","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.1504-291X-2021-01-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the 20th century, Norway experienced two very serious banking crises, respectively in 1920–28 and 1988–93. Relative to the size of the economy, both these crises were comparable in size with the banking crises that took place in Ireland, the UK and the USA in 2007–10, during the global financial crisis. This article presents a comparison of several distributional effects that followed in the wake of, respectively, the two Norwegian crises and the above-mentioned national banking crises of 2007–10. The analysis is based on empirical material taken from both historical statistics and earlier research studies. The analysis takes as its starting point some structural similarities and differences between the three financial regimes in which the crises in question took place – that is, a classic liberal regime; an early phase of a neoliberal regime; and a full-blown neoliberal regime. First, the gross changes in distribution of incomes and wealth in the societies concerned are analyzed. The analysis argues that in all three time periods, there was a rise Årgang 62, nr. 1-2021, s. 51–77 ISSN online: 1504-291X","PeriodicalId":43822,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The bad, the good and the ugly\",\"authors\":\"Geir O. Rønning\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/ISSN.1504-291X-2021-01-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the 20th century, Norway experienced two very serious banking crises, respectively in 1920–28 and 1988–93. Relative to the size of the economy, both these crises were comparable in size with the banking crises that took place in Ireland, the UK and the USA in 2007–10, during the global financial crisis. This article presents a comparison of several distributional effects that followed in the wake of, respectively, the two Norwegian crises and the above-mentioned national banking crises of 2007–10. The analysis is based on empirical material taken from both historical statistics and earlier research studies. The analysis takes as its starting point some structural similarities and differences between the three financial regimes in which the crises in question took place – that is, a classic liberal regime; an early phase of a neoliberal regime; and a full-blown neoliberal regime. First, the gross changes in distribution of incomes and wealth in the societies concerned are analyzed. The analysis argues that in all three time periods, there was a rise Årgang 62, nr. 1-2021, s. 51–77 ISSN online: 1504-291X\",\"PeriodicalId\":43822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1504-291X-2021-01-03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1504-291X-2021-01-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在20世纪,挪威分别在1920-28年和1988-93年经历了两次非常严重的银行危机。相对于经济规模而言,这两次危机的规模与2007 - 2010年全球金融危机期间发生在爱尔兰、英国和美国的银行业危机相当。本文分别比较了两次挪威危机和上述2007-10年国家银行危机之后的几种分配效应。该分析基于历史统计和早期研究的经验材料。这一分析的出发点是,发生上述危机的三种金融体制之间存在一些结构上的异同:一种是经典的自由主义体制;新自由主义政权的早期阶段;以及一个成熟的新自由主义政权。首先,分析了有关社会中收入和财富分配的总体变化。分析认为,在所有三个时期,都有上升Årgang 62, nr. 1-2021, s. 51-77。ISSN online: 1504-291X
During the 20th century, Norway experienced two very serious banking crises, respectively in 1920–28 and 1988–93. Relative to the size of the economy, both these crises were comparable in size with the banking crises that took place in Ireland, the UK and the USA in 2007–10, during the global financial crisis. This article presents a comparison of several distributional effects that followed in the wake of, respectively, the two Norwegian crises and the above-mentioned national banking crises of 2007–10. The analysis is based on empirical material taken from both historical statistics and earlier research studies. The analysis takes as its starting point some structural similarities and differences between the three financial regimes in which the crises in question took place – that is, a classic liberal regime; an early phase of a neoliberal regime; and a full-blown neoliberal regime. First, the gross changes in distribution of incomes and wealth in the societies concerned are analyzed. The analysis argues that in all three time periods, there was a rise Årgang 62, nr. 1-2021, s. 51–77 ISSN online: 1504-291X
期刊介绍:
Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning presenterer resultater fra dagsaktuelle samfunnsvitenskapelige undersøkelser for et bredere publikum, og kommer ut fire ganger i året. Hovedvekten er lagt på publisering av originalartikler av norske samfunnsforskere, basert på empiriske undersøkelser. Tidsskriftet bringer også kunnskapsoversikter, debattstoff, forskningspolitiske innlegg, notiser og bokanmeldelser. Det gis også ut spesielle temanummer. Tidsskriftet utkom første gang i 1960, og utgis i samarbeid med Universitetsforlaget.