用于估计治疗效果的模型平均

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Zhihao Zhao, Xinyu Zhang, Guohua Zou, Alan T. K. Wan, Geoffrey K. F. Tso
{"title":"用于估计治疗效果的模型平均","authors":"Zhihao Zhao,&nbsp;Xinyu Zhang,&nbsp;Guohua Zou,&nbsp;Alan T. K. Wan,&nbsp;Geoffrey K. F. Tso","doi":"10.1007/s10463-023-00876-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The estimation of treatment effects on the response variable is often a primary goal in empirical investigations in disciplines such as medicine, economics and marketing. Typically, the investigator would select one model from a multitude of models and estimate the treatment effects based on this single winning model. In this paper, we consider an alternative model averaging approach, where estimates of treatment effects are obtained from not one single model but a weighted ensemble of models. We develop a weight choice method based on a minimisation of the approximate risk under squared error loss of the model average estimator of the conditional treatment effects. We prove that the model average estimator resulting from this criterion has an optimal asymptotic property. The results of a simulation study show that the proposed approach is superior to various existing model selection and averaging methods in a large region of the parameter space in finite samples. The proposed method is applied to a data set on HIV treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55511,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model averaging for estimating treatment effects\",\"authors\":\"Zhihao Zhao,&nbsp;Xinyu Zhang,&nbsp;Guohua Zou,&nbsp;Alan T. K. Wan,&nbsp;Geoffrey K. F. Tso\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10463-023-00876-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The estimation of treatment effects on the response variable is often a primary goal in empirical investigations in disciplines such as medicine, economics and marketing. Typically, the investigator would select one model from a multitude of models and estimate the treatment effects based on this single winning model. In this paper, we consider an alternative model averaging approach, where estimates of treatment effects are obtained from not one single model but a weighted ensemble of models. We develop a weight choice method based on a minimisation of the approximate risk under squared error loss of the model average estimator of the conditional treatment effects. We prove that the model average estimator resulting from this criterion has an optimal asymptotic property. The results of a simulation study show that the proposed approach is superior to various existing model selection and averaging methods in a large region of the parameter space in finite samples. The proposed method is applied to a data set on HIV treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10463-023-00876-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10463-023-00876-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在医学、经济学和市场营销等学科的实证研究中,估计治疗效果对响应变量的影响往往是首要目标。通常情况下,研究人员会从众多模型中选择一个模型,并根据这个单一的获胜模型来估计治疗效果。在本文中,我们考虑了另一种模型平均法,即不是从一个单一模型,而是从一系列加权模型中获得治疗效果的估计值。我们开发了一种权重选择方法,该方法基于条件治疗效果的模型平均估计值平方误差损失下近似风险的最小化。我们证明,根据这一标准得出的模型平均估计值具有最优渐近特性。模拟研究结果表明,在有限样本参数空间的较大区域内,所提出的方法优于现有的各种模型选择和平均方法。所提出的方法适用于艾滋病治疗数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Model averaging for estimating treatment effects

Model averaging for estimating treatment effects

The estimation of treatment effects on the response variable is often a primary goal in empirical investigations in disciplines such as medicine, economics and marketing. Typically, the investigator would select one model from a multitude of models and estimate the treatment effects based on this single winning model. In this paper, we consider an alternative model averaging approach, where estimates of treatment effects are obtained from not one single model but a weighted ensemble of models. We develop a weight choice method based on a minimisation of the approximate risk under squared error loss of the model average estimator of the conditional treatment effects. We prove that the model average estimator resulting from this criterion has an optimal asymptotic property. The results of a simulation study show that the proposed approach is superior to various existing model selection and averaging methods in a large region of the parameter space in finite samples. The proposed method is applied to a data set on HIV treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics (AISM) aims to provide a forum for open communication among statisticians, and to contribute to the advancement of statistics as a science to enable humans to handle information in order to cope with uncertainties. It publishes high-quality papers that shed new light on the theoretical, computational and/or methodological aspects of statistical science. Emphasis is placed on (a) development of new methodologies motivated by real data, (b) development of unifying theories, and (c) analysis and improvement of existing methodologies and theories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信