263. Dupilumab治疗成人和青少年嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎至52周的疗效和安全性:来自liberty eoe tree的结果

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
E. Dellon, M. Rothenberg, M. Collins, I. Hirano, M. Chehade, A. Bredenoord, A. Lucendo, J. Spergel, Xian Sun, J. Hamilton, E. Mortensen, Lila G. Glotfelty, A. Shabbir
{"title":"263. Dupilumab治疗成人和青少年嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎至52周的疗效和安全性:来自liberty eoe tree的结果","authors":"E. Dellon, M. Rothenberg, M. Collins, I. Hirano, M. Chehade, A. Bredenoord, A. Lucendo, J. Spergel, Xian Sun, J. Hamilton, E. Mortensen, Lila G. Glotfelty, A. Shabbir","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad052.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n In Parts A and B of the 3-part, phase 3 LIBERTY EoE TREET study (NCT03633617), dupilumab 300 mg weekly (DPL qw) vs placebo (PBO) demonstrated significant efficacy and acceptable safety up to 24 weeks in adults and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Patients who completed Parts A and B entered Part C and received DPL qw to 52 weeks. Here we present 52-week results from patients who completed Part B and continued to Part C.\n \n \n \n Of 80 DPL qw patients in Part B, 74 continued DPL qw in Part C (DPL/DPL). Of 79 PBO pts in Part B, 37 patients received DPL qw in Part C (PBO/DPL). Part B co-primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil (eos) count ≤6 eos/high- power field (hpf) and absolute change from Part B baseline in Dysphagia Symptom Score (DSQ) score at Week 24. Key secondary endpoints are listed in the Table. In Part C, all co-primary and secondary endpoints were assessed at Week 52 as secondary endpoints. Safety was also assessed.\n \n \n \n At Week 52, 84.6% of DPL/DPL and 67.6% of PBO/DPL patients achieved peak eos count ≤6 eos/hpf; mean (SD) absolute change from Part B baseline in DSQ score was −30.26 (15.39) for DPL/DPL and − 27.25 (11.46) for PBO/DPL patients. At Week 52, 100% of DPL/DPL and 78.4% of PBO/DPL patients achieved peak eos count <15 eos/hpf, 30.8% of DPL/DPL and 16.2% of PBO/DPL patients achieved peak eos count ≤1 eos/hpf, and compared to Part B baseline, peak eos count, EREFS, and HSS grade and stage scores were reduced (Table). DPL demonstrated an acceptable safety profile.\n \n \n \n DPL qw demonstrated persistent improvements in clinical, symptomatic, histologic, and endoscopic features of EoE up to 52 weeks and had an acceptable safety profile. PBO patients from Part B who received DPL in Part C showed similar efficacy to dupilumab qw patients of Part B.\n \n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"263. DUPILUMAB EFFICACY AND SAFETY TO 52 WEEKS IN ADULT AND ADOLESCENT PATIENTS WITH EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS: RESULTS FROM LIBERTY EOE TREET\",\"authors\":\"E. Dellon, M. Rothenberg, M. Collins, I. Hirano, M. Chehade, A. Bredenoord, A. Lucendo, J. Spergel, Xian Sun, J. Hamilton, E. Mortensen, Lila G. Glotfelty, A. Shabbir\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doad052.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n In Parts A and B of the 3-part, phase 3 LIBERTY EoE TREET study (NCT03633617), dupilumab 300 mg weekly (DPL qw) vs placebo (PBO) demonstrated significant efficacy and acceptable safety up to 24 weeks in adults and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Patients who completed Parts A and B entered Part C and received DPL qw to 52 weeks. Here we present 52-week results from patients who completed Part B and continued to Part C.\\n \\n \\n \\n Of 80 DPL qw patients in Part B, 74 continued DPL qw in Part C (DPL/DPL). Of 79 PBO pts in Part B, 37 patients received DPL qw in Part C (PBO/DPL). Part B co-primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil (eos) count ≤6 eos/high- power field (hpf) and absolute change from Part B baseline in Dysphagia Symptom Score (DSQ) score at Week 24. Key secondary endpoints are listed in the Table. In Part C, all co-primary and secondary endpoints were assessed at Week 52 as secondary endpoints. Safety was also assessed.\\n \\n \\n \\n At Week 52, 84.6% of DPL/DPL and 67.6% of PBO/DPL patients achieved peak eos count ≤6 eos/hpf; mean (SD) absolute change from Part B baseline in DSQ score was −30.26 (15.39) for DPL/DPL and − 27.25 (11.46) for PBO/DPL patients. At Week 52, 100% of DPL/DPL and 78.4% of PBO/DPL patients achieved peak eos count <15 eos/hpf, 30.8% of DPL/DPL and 16.2% of PBO/DPL patients achieved peak eos count ≤1 eos/hpf, and compared to Part B baseline, peak eos count, EREFS, and HSS grade and stage scores were reduced (Table). DPL demonstrated an acceptable safety profile.\\n \\n \\n \\n DPL qw demonstrated persistent improvements in clinical, symptomatic, histologic, and endoscopic features of EoE up to 52 weeks and had an acceptable safety profile. PBO patients from Part B who received DPL in Part C showed similar efficacy to dupilumab qw patients of Part B.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad052.104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad052.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在3部分3期LIBERTY-EoE TREET研究(NCT03633617)的A和B部分中,杜匹单抗每周300 mg(DPL-qw)与安慰剂(PBO)在患有嗜酸性食管炎(EoE)的成人和青少年中显示出显著的疗效和可接受的安全性,最长可达24周。完成A和B部分的患者进入C部分,接受DPL qw至52周。在这里,我们展示了完成B部分并继续进行C部分的患者52周的结果。在B部分的80名DPL qw患者中,C部分的74名继续DPL qw(DPL/DPL)。在B部分的79名PBO患者中,37名患者接受了C部分的DPL qw(PBO/DPL)。B部分的共同主要终点是在第24周达到食管上皮内嗜酸性粒细胞(eos)计数峰值≤6 eos/高功率场(hpf)的患者比例,以及吞咽困难症状评分(DSQ)评分与B部分基线相比的绝对变化。表中列出了关键的次要终点。在C部分中,在第52周评估所有共同主要和次要终点作为次要终点。还对安全性进行了评估。在第52周,84.6%的DPL/DPL和67.6%的PBO/DPL患者达到峰值eos计数≤6 eos/hpf;DPL/DPL的DSQ评分与B部分基线的平均(SD)绝对变化为−30.26(15.39) − PBO/DPL患者为27.25(11.46)。在第52周,100%的DPL/DPL和78.4%的PBO/DPL患者达到峰值eos计数<15 eos/hpf,30.8%的DPL/DPI和16.2%的PBO/DPI患者达到峰值eos计数≤1 eos/hpf,与B部分基线相比,峰值eos数、EREFS、HSS分级和分期得分降低(表)。DPL证明了可接受的安全状况。DPL-qw在EoE的临床、症状、组织学和内镜特征方面表现出持续改善,直至52周,并且具有可接受的安全性。在C部分接受DPL的来自B部分的PBO患者显示出与B部分的dupilumab qw患者相似的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
263. DUPILUMAB EFFICACY AND SAFETY TO 52 WEEKS IN ADULT AND ADOLESCENT PATIENTS WITH EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS: RESULTS FROM LIBERTY EOE TREET
In Parts A and B of the 3-part, phase 3 LIBERTY EoE TREET study (NCT03633617), dupilumab 300 mg weekly (DPL qw) vs placebo (PBO) demonstrated significant efficacy and acceptable safety up to 24 weeks in adults and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Patients who completed Parts A and B entered Part C and received DPL qw to 52 weeks. Here we present 52-week results from patients who completed Part B and continued to Part C. Of 80 DPL qw patients in Part B, 74 continued DPL qw in Part C (DPL/DPL). Of 79 PBO pts in Part B, 37 patients received DPL qw in Part C (PBO/DPL). Part B co-primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil (eos) count ≤6 eos/high- power field (hpf) and absolute change from Part B baseline in Dysphagia Symptom Score (DSQ) score at Week 24. Key secondary endpoints are listed in the Table. In Part C, all co-primary and secondary endpoints were assessed at Week 52 as secondary endpoints. Safety was also assessed. At Week 52, 84.6% of DPL/DPL and 67.6% of PBO/DPL patients achieved peak eos count ≤6 eos/hpf; mean (SD) absolute change from Part B baseline in DSQ score was −30.26 (15.39) for DPL/DPL and − 27.25 (11.46) for PBO/DPL patients. At Week 52, 100% of DPL/DPL and 78.4% of PBO/DPL patients achieved peak eos count <15 eos/hpf, 30.8% of DPL/DPL and 16.2% of PBO/DPL patients achieved peak eos count ≤1 eos/hpf, and compared to Part B baseline, peak eos count, EREFS, and HSS grade and stage scores were reduced (Table). DPL demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. DPL qw demonstrated persistent improvements in clinical, symptomatic, histologic, and endoscopic features of EoE up to 52 weeks and had an acceptable safety profile. PBO patients from Part B who received DPL in Part C showed similar efficacy to dupilumab qw patients of Part B.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信