虐待休·戴维斯:17世纪美国道德案件的犯罪认定

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
A. Willis
{"title":"虐待休·戴维斯:17世纪美国道德案件的犯罪认定","authors":"A. Willis","doi":"10.7560/JHS28105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"O n a f a t e f u l m i d -S e p t e m b e r day in 1630, Hugh Davis found himself accused of a horrifying litany of crimes. He had shamed Christians. He had dishonored God. Moreover, he had abused himself. Davis had committed all of these crimes by lying with a Negro, and he paid a fearsome price for his transgression: the court ordered him to be flogged—publicly brutalized and humiliated—in front of an assembly of both whites and Africans. While Hugh Davis’s life must have left other marks in the historical record, the court’s sentence, a mere forty-three words long, is the only document about him to have survived. Starting with Carter Woodson, who wrote in 1918, most historians have assigned the Davis case to the history of American race relations and particularly to the hostility toward miscegenation so prevalent in the seventeenth century. If Davis committed fornication, then the case fits. Scholars have long recognized, as Jennifer M. Spear argues, that “throughout colonial","PeriodicalId":45704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","volume":"28 1","pages":"117 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abusing Hugh Davis: Determining the Crime in a Seventeenth-Century American Morality Case\",\"authors\":\"A. Willis\",\"doi\":\"10.7560/JHS28105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"O n a f a t e f u l m i d -S e p t e m b e r day in 1630, Hugh Davis found himself accused of a horrifying litany of crimes. He had shamed Christians. He had dishonored God. Moreover, he had abused himself. Davis had committed all of these crimes by lying with a Negro, and he paid a fearsome price for his transgression: the court ordered him to be flogged—publicly brutalized and humiliated—in front of an assembly of both whites and Africans. While Hugh Davis’s life must have left other marks in the historical record, the court’s sentence, a mere forty-three words long, is the only document about him to have survived. Starting with Carter Woodson, who wrote in 1918, most historians have assigned the Davis case to the history of American race relations and particularly to the hostility toward miscegenation so prevalent in the seventeenth century. If Davis committed fornication, then the case fits. Scholars have long recognized, as Jennifer M. Spear argues, that “throughout colonial\",\"PeriodicalId\":45704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the History of Sexuality\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the History of Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7560/JHS28105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/JHS28105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1630年,休·戴维斯发现自己被指控犯有一系列可怕的罪行。他使基督徒蒙羞。他玷污了上帝。此外,他还虐待自己。戴维斯通过与黑人撒谎犯下了所有这些罪行,他为自己的违法行为付出了可怕的代价:法庭命令他在白人和非洲人的集会面前被鞭打——公开施暴和羞辱。虽然休·戴维斯的一生一定在历史记录中留下了其他印记,但法院的判决只有四十三个字,是唯一幸存的关于他的文件。从1918年的卡特·伍德森开始,大多数历史学家都将戴维斯案归因于美国种族关系史,尤其是17世纪普遍存在的对异族通婚的敌意。如果戴维斯犯了通奸罪,那么这个案子就成立了。正如Jennifer M.Spear所说,学者们早就认识到,“在整个殖民时期
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abusing Hugh Davis: Determining the Crime in a Seventeenth-Century American Morality Case
O n a f a t e f u l m i d -S e p t e m b e r day in 1630, Hugh Davis found himself accused of a horrifying litany of crimes. He had shamed Christians. He had dishonored God. Moreover, he had abused himself. Davis had committed all of these crimes by lying with a Negro, and he paid a fearsome price for his transgression: the court ordered him to be flogged—publicly brutalized and humiliated—in front of an assembly of both whites and Africans. While Hugh Davis’s life must have left other marks in the historical record, the court’s sentence, a mere forty-three words long, is the only document about him to have survived. Starting with Carter Woodson, who wrote in 1918, most historians have assigned the Davis case to the history of American race relations and particularly to the hostility toward miscegenation so prevalent in the seventeenth century. If Davis committed fornication, then the case fits. Scholars have long recognized, as Jennifer M. Spear argues, that “throughout colonial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信