J. Miadlikowska, N. Magain, C. J. Pardo-de La Hoz, Dong-ling Niu, T. Goward, E. Sérusiaux, F. Lutzoni
{"title":"经分子系统发育修正后,虎耳草属虎耳草亚组的种仍然是隐种","authors":"J. Miadlikowska, N. Magain, C. J. Pardo-de La Hoz, Dong-ling Niu, T. Goward, E. Sérusiaux, F. Lutzoni","doi":"10.2478/pfs-2018-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Closely related lichen-forming fungal species circumscribed using phenotypic traits (morphospecies) do not always align well with phylogenetic inferences based on molecular data. Using multilocus data obtained from a worldwide sampling, we inferred phylogenetic relationships among five currently accepted morphospecies of Peltigera section Peltidea (P. aphthosa group). Monophyletic circumscription of all currently recognized morphospecies (P. britannica, P. chionophila, P. frippii and P. malacea) except P. aphthosa, which contained P. britannica, was confirmed with high bootstrap support. Following their re-delimitation using bGMYC and Structurama, BPP validated 14 putative species including nine previously unrecognized potential species (five within P. malacea, five within P. aphthosa, and two within P. britannica). Because none of the undescribed potential species are corroborated morphologically, chemically, geographically or ecologically, we concluded that these monophyletic entities represent intraspecific phylogenetic structure, and, therefore, should not be recognized as new species. Cyanobionts associated with Peltidea mycobionts (51 individuals) represented 22 unique rbcLX haplotypes from five phylogroups in Clade II subclades 2 and 3. With rare exceptions, Nostoc taxa involved in trimembered and bimembered associations are phylogenetically closely related (subclade 2) or identical, suggesting a mostly shared cyanobiont pool with infrequent switches. Based on a broad geographical sampling, we confirm a high specificity of Nostoc subclade 2 with their mycobionts, including a mutualistically exclusive association between phylogroup III and specific lineages of P. malacea.","PeriodicalId":52151,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Fungal Systematics","volume":"63 1","pages":"45 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species in section Peltidea (aphthosa group) of the genus Peltigera remain cryptic after molecular phylogenetic revision\",\"authors\":\"J. Miadlikowska, N. Magain, C. J. Pardo-de La Hoz, Dong-ling Niu, T. Goward, E. Sérusiaux, F. Lutzoni\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/pfs-2018-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Closely related lichen-forming fungal species circumscribed using phenotypic traits (morphospecies) do not always align well with phylogenetic inferences based on molecular data. Using multilocus data obtained from a worldwide sampling, we inferred phylogenetic relationships among five currently accepted morphospecies of Peltigera section Peltidea (P. aphthosa group). Monophyletic circumscription of all currently recognized morphospecies (P. britannica, P. chionophila, P. frippii and P. malacea) except P. aphthosa, which contained P. britannica, was confirmed with high bootstrap support. Following their re-delimitation using bGMYC and Structurama, BPP validated 14 putative species including nine previously unrecognized potential species (five within P. malacea, five within P. aphthosa, and two within P. britannica). Because none of the undescribed potential species are corroborated morphologically, chemically, geographically or ecologically, we concluded that these monophyletic entities represent intraspecific phylogenetic structure, and, therefore, should not be recognized as new species. Cyanobionts associated with Peltidea mycobionts (51 individuals) represented 22 unique rbcLX haplotypes from five phylogroups in Clade II subclades 2 and 3. With rare exceptions, Nostoc taxa involved in trimembered and bimembered associations are phylogenetically closely related (subclade 2) or identical, suggesting a mostly shared cyanobiont pool with infrequent switches. Based on a broad geographical sampling, we confirm a high specificity of Nostoc subclade 2 with their mycobionts, including a mutualistically exclusive association between phylogroup III and specific lineages of P. malacea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Fungal Systematics\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"45 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Fungal Systematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/pfs-2018-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Fungal Systematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pfs-2018-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
摘要
密切相关的地衣形成真菌物种使用表型特征(形态物种)限定并不总是与基于分子数据的系统发育推断很好地一致。利用在世界范围内取样的多位点数据,我们推测了Peltigera组Peltidea (P. aphthosa group)中五个目前公认的形态种之间的系统发育关系。目前已知的形态种(P. britannica, P. chionophila, P. frippii和P. malacea)除P. aphthosa(含P. britannica)外,其余的形态种均为单系划分,具有较高的bootstrap支持度。在使用bGMYC和Structurama进行重新划分之后,BPP验证了14个假定的物种,包括9个以前未被认识的潜在物种(5个在P. malacea, 5个在P. aphthosa, 2个在P. britannica)。由于这些未被描述的潜在物种在形态、化学、地理或生态学上都没有得到证实,因此我们得出结论,这些单系实体代表了种内系统发育结构,因此不应被视为新种。与Peltidea mycobionts相关的蓝藻生物(51个个体)代表了22个独特的rbcLX单倍型,来自II分支亚分支2和3的5个系统群。除了极少数例外,参与修剪和双修剪组合的怀旧分类群在系统发育上密切相关(亚支系2)或相同,这表明蓝藻群大多共享,很少切换。基于广泛的地理采样,我们证实了Nostoc亚枝2与它们的分枝原体的高度特异性,包括系统群III与P. malacea特定谱系之间的相互排他关联。
Species in section Peltidea (aphthosa group) of the genus Peltigera remain cryptic after molecular phylogenetic revision
Abstract Closely related lichen-forming fungal species circumscribed using phenotypic traits (morphospecies) do not always align well with phylogenetic inferences based on molecular data. Using multilocus data obtained from a worldwide sampling, we inferred phylogenetic relationships among five currently accepted morphospecies of Peltigera section Peltidea (P. aphthosa group). Monophyletic circumscription of all currently recognized morphospecies (P. britannica, P. chionophila, P. frippii and P. malacea) except P. aphthosa, which contained P. britannica, was confirmed with high bootstrap support. Following their re-delimitation using bGMYC and Structurama, BPP validated 14 putative species including nine previously unrecognized potential species (five within P. malacea, five within P. aphthosa, and two within P. britannica). Because none of the undescribed potential species are corroborated morphologically, chemically, geographically or ecologically, we concluded that these monophyletic entities represent intraspecific phylogenetic structure, and, therefore, should not be recognized as new species. Cyanobionts associated with Peltidea mycobionts (51 individuals) represented 22 unique rbcLX haplotypes from five phylogroups in Clade II subclades 2 and 3. With rare exceptions, Nostoc taxa involved in trimembered and bimembered associations are phylogenetically closely related (subclade 2) or identical, suggesting a mostly shared cyanobiont pool with infrequent switches. Based on a broad geographical sampling, we confirm a high specificity of Nostoc subclade 2 with their mycobionts, including a mutualistically exclusive association between phylogroup III and specific lineages of P. malacea.