商业法规和城市间移民

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
Alicia Plemmons, Sriparna Ghosh
{"title":"商业法规和城市间移民","authors":"Alicia Plemmons, Sriparna Ghosh","doi":"10.1177/10911421221124577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Local governments compete for new residents by creating institutional frameworks that are attractive to such residents. As 13 percent of the US moves each year, policies that affect the ease of doing business may attract thousands of entrepreneurial and working households. We use city-level aggregated migration data from the American Community Survey and Internal Revenue Service to analyze changes in net migration between cities that differ in the ease of starting a business, employing workers, getting electricity, registering property, and paying taxes. Expansions in the flexibility of regulatory processes that affect workers multiple times, such as ease of employing workers or filing taxes, have large effects in encouraging in-migration. In contrast, improvements in policies that only affect new workers or business owners temporarily, such as ease of installing utilities or registering property, do not have a noticeable effect on migration patterns.","PeriodicalId":46919,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW","volume":"50 1","pages":"579 - 596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Business Regulations and Between-City Migration\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Plemmons, Sriparna Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10911421221124577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Local governments compete for new residents by creating institutional frameworks that are attractive to such residents. As 13 percent of the US moves each year, policies that affect the ease of doing business may attract thousands of entrepreneurial and working households. We use city-level aggregated migration data from the American Community Survey and Internal Revenue Service to analyze changes in net migration between cities that differ in the ease of starting a business, employing workers, getting electricity, registering property, and paying taxes. Expansions in the flexibility of regulatory processes that affect workers multiple times, such as ease of employing workers or filing taxes, have large effects in encouraging in-migration. In contrast, improvements in policies that only affect new workers or business owners temporarily, such as ease of installing utilities or registering property, do not have a noticeable effect on migration patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"579 - 596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421221124577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421221124577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

地方政府通过建立对新居民有吸引力的制度框架来争夺新居民。随着美国每年13%的人口流动,影响经商便利性的政策可能会吸引成千上万的创业和工薪家庭。我们使用美国社区调查和美国国税局的城市级汇总移民数据来分析城市之间净移民的变化,这些变化在创业、雇佣工人、用电、财产登记和纳税方面有所不同。监管程序的灵活性的扩大多次影响工人,例如雇佣工人或报税的便利性,对鼓励移民有很大影响。相比之下,仅暂时影响新工人或企业主的政策的改进,如安装公用设施或登记财产的便利性,对移民模式没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Business Regulations and Between-City Migration
Local governments compete for new residents by creating institutional frameworks that are attractive to such residents. As 13 percent of the US moves each year, policies that affect the ease of doing business may attract thousands of entrepreneurial and working households. We use city-level aggregated migration data from the American Community Survey and Internal Revenue Service to analyze changes in net migration between cities that differ in the ease of starting a business, employing workers, getting electricity, registering property, and paying taxes. Expansions in the flexibility of regulatory processes that affect workers multiple times, such as ease of employing workers or filing taxes, have large effects in encouraging in-migration. In contrast, improvements in policies that only affect new workers or business owners temporarily, such as ease of installing utilities or registering property, do not have a noticeable effect on migration patterns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Public Finance Review is a professional forum devoted to US policy-oriented economic research and theory, which focuses on a variety of allocation, distribution and stabilization functions within the public-sector economy. Economists, policy makers, political scientists, and researchers all rely on Public Finance Review, to bring them the most up-to-date information on the ever changing US public finance system, and to help them put policies and research into action. Public Finance Review not only presents rigorous empirical and theoretical papers on public economic policies, but also examines and critiques their impact and consequences. The journal analyzes the nature and function of evolving US governmental fiscal policies at the national, state and local levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信