德国癌症登记处皮肤癌发病率登记的方法学分析

Sunnia Gupta, R. Reintjes, N. Trialonis-Suthakharan
{"title":"德国癌症登记处皮肤癌发病率登记的方法学分析","authors":"Sunnia Gupta, R. Reintjes, N. Trialonis-Suthakharan","doi":"10.21037/ace.2019.08.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skin cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world but non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has been included for the first time in the Global Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence (GLOBOCAN). Germany is one of the countries with high-quality data collected by 16 population-based cancer registries, yet NMSC always faced completion issues because of out-patient based treatment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the methodology of skin cancer incidence registration, assess the quality of data on skin cancer, and suggest improvements. The information was extracted from annual reports of all German cancer registries, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the Manual of cancer registration, through a questionnaire sent to all the registries and relevant articles. Comparison of the methodology with that of Nordic countries was done to suggest improvements. Legislative laws for remuneration, changing ICD codes, no multiple tumors counting, all affect skin cancer registration and its reported incidence rate. Use of mortality/incidence (M/I) ratio as an assessment of completeness, national skin cancer screening (SCS) project, the incomplete Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging, determine the quality of skin cancer data. This data is definitely more complete for malignant melanoma (MM) as compared to NMSC. Nordic countries have achieved higher completion even for skin cancer data. Reporting basal cell cancer (BCC) in a separate file, recording the tumor stage and site specifications will improve the quality of data. Remuneration laws and rules for multiple tumors need to be reformed and standardized across all the federal states. Upcoming clinical cancer registries would complement the epidemiological registries and help improve the situation in the future in Germany.","PeriodicalId":92868,"journal":{"name":"Annals of cancer epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/ace.2019.08.04","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the methodology of skin cancer incidence registration in German cancer registries\",\"authors\":\"Sunnia Gupta, R. Reintjes, N. Trialonis-Suthakharan\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/ace.2019.08.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Skin cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world but non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has been included for the first time in the Global Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence (GLOBOCAN). Germany is one of the countries with high-quality data collected by 16 population-based cancer registries, yet NMSC always faced completion issues because of out-patient based treatment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the methodology of skin cancer incidence registration, assess the quality of data on skin cancer, and suggest improvements. The information was extracted from annual reports of all German cancer registries, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the Manual of cancer registration, through a questionnaire sent to all the registries and relevant articles. Comparison of the methodology with that of Nordic countries was done to suggest improvements. Legislative laws for remuneration, changing ICD codes, no multiple tumors counting, all affect skin cancer registration and its reported incidence rate. Use of mortality/incidence (M/I) ratio as an assessment of completeness, national skin cancer screening (SCS) project, the incomplete Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging, determine the quality of skin cancer data. This data is definitely more complete for malignant melanoma (MM) as compared to NMSC. Nordic countries have achieved higher completion even for skin cancer data. Reporting basal cell cancer (BCC) in a separate file, recording the tumor stage and site specifications will improve the quality of data. Remuneration laws and rules for multiple tumors need to be reformed and standardized across all the federal states. Upcoming clinical cancer registries would complement the epidemiological registries and help improve the situation in the future in Germany.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of cancer epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/ace.2019.08.04\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of cancer epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/ace.2019.08.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of cancer epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ace.2019.08.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

皮肤癌是世界上最常见的癌症之一,但非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)首次被纳入全球癌症发病率、死亡率和患病率(GLOBOCAN)。德国是拥有16个基于人群的癌症登记处收集的高质量数据的国家之一,但由于门诊治疗,NMSC始终面临着完成问题。本研究的目的是分析皮肤癌发病率登记的方法学,评估皮肤癌数据的质量,并提出改进建议。这些信息是从所有德国癌症登记处的年度报告中提取的,罗伯特·科赫研究所(RKI),癌症登记手册,通过发给所有登记处的问卷调查和相关文章。将该方法与北欧国家的方法进行比较,以提出改进建议。关于报酬的立法,改变ICD代码,没有多发性肿瘤计数,都影响皮肤癌登记及其报告的发病率。使用死亡率/发病率(M/I)比作为评估完整性,国家皮肤癌筛查(SCS)项目,不完全肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)分期,确定皮肤癌数据的质量。与NMSC相比,恶性黑色素瘤(MM)的数据肯定更完整。北欧国家甚至在皮肤癌数据方面也取得了较高的完成率。在单独的文件中报告基底细胞癌(BCC),记录肿瘤分期和部位规格将提高数据质量。所有联邦州都需要对多发性肿瘤的薪酬法律和规则进行改革和标准化。即将到来的临床癌症登记将补充流行病学登记,并有助于改善未来在德国的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the methodology of skin cancer incidence registration in German cancer registries
Skin cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world but non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has been included for the first time in the Global Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence (GLOBOCAN). Germany is one of the countries with high-quality data collected by 16 population-based cancer registries, yet NMSC always faced completion issues because of out-patient based treatment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the methodology of skin cancer incidence registration, assess the quality of data on skin cancer, and suggest improvements. The information was extracted from annual reports of all German cancer registries, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the Manual of cancer registration, through a questionnaire sent to all the registries and relevant articles. Comparison of the methodology with that of Nordic countries was done to suggest improvements. Legislative laws for remuneration, changing ICD codes, no multiple tumors counting, all affect skin cancer registration and its reported incidence rate. Use of mortality/incidence (M/I) ratio as an assessment of completeness, national skin cancer screening (SCS) project, the incomplete Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging, determine the quality of skin cancer data. This data is definitely more complete for malignant melanoma (MM) as compared to NMSC. Nordic countries have achieved higher completion even for skin cancer data. Reporting basal cell cancer (BCC) in a separate file, recording the tumor stage and site specifications will improve the quality of data. Remuneration laws and rules for multiple tumors need to be reformed and standardized across all the federal states. Upcoming clinical cancer registries would complement the epidemiological registries and help improve the situation in the future in Germany.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信