纸张与移动应用程序在COVID-19大流行背景下的结直肠癌筛查

A. Handaya, M. Hardianti, H. Rinonce, Victor Agastya Pramudya Werdana, Aditya Rifqi Fauzi, J. Andrew, A. S. Hanif, Kevin Radinal Tjendra, A. F. Aditya
{"title":"纸张与移动应用程序在COVID-19大流行背景下的结直肠癌筛查","authors":"A. Handaya, M. Hardianti, H. Rinonce, Victor Agastya Pramudya Werdana, Aditya Rifqi Fauzi, J. Andrew, A. S. Hanif, Kevin Radinal Tjendra, A. F. Aditya","doi":"10.20473/jpk.v11.i1.2023.19-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Asia has kept increasing in the last decade. The morbidity and mortality for CRC can be reduced with early detection; however, mass CRC screening with imaging modalities such as colonoscopy, CT scan, or MRI is unfeasible in developing countries such as Indonesia. Asia Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) is utilized to stratify individual CRC risk. Online screening via mobile application is an alternative method to ensure the continuity of community screening without risking COVID-19 transmission. Objective: We conducted a descriptive study to evaluate CRC risk using APCS in two different villages. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study involving 925 and 207 subjects in 2019 and 2020, respectively. The APCS survey in 2019 was done before the COVID-19 pandemic with paper-based questionnaires and direct assessment by door-to-door approach. Meanwhile, the APCS survey in 2020 was done during the COVID-19 pandemic using websites and mobile apps available for Android and iOS. We gathered participants’ characteristics and the APCS score in both groups and tabulated them. Results: In 2019, out of 925 subjects; 472 (51%) have been classified an average risk of CRC, 370 (40%) have been classified as having a moderate risk of CRC, and 83 (9%) have been classified as in high risk of CRC. In 2020, out of 207 subjects; 106 (51.2%) have been classified as the average risk of CRC, 86 (41.5%) have been classified as the moderate risk of CRC, and 15 (7.3%) have been classified as high risk of CRC. Conclusion: Although there was a decrease in the participation of the screening program with mobile applications in the pandemic era compared with paper-based questionnaires before the pandemic era, online screening using APCS in mobile applications is a preferred alternative for an effective screening method in this pandemic and possibly in the future in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":32957,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Promkes The Indonesian Journal of Health Promotion and Health Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paper-Based versus Mobile Apps for Colorectal Cancer Screening in COVID-19 Pandemic Setting\",\"authors\":\"A. Handaya, M. Hardianti, H. Rinonce, Victor Agastya Pramudya Werdana, Aditya Rifqi Fauzi, J. Andrew, A. S. Hanif, Kevin Radinal Tjendra, A. F. Aditya\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/jpk.v11.i1.2023.19-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Asia has kept increasing in the last decade. The morbidity and mortality for CRC can be reduced with early detection; however, mass CRC screening with imaging modalities such as colonoscopy, CT scan, or MRI is unfeasible in developing countries such as Indonesia. Asia Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) is utilized to stratify individual CRC risk. Online screening via mobile application is an alternative method to ensure the continuity of community screening without risking COVID-19 transmission. Objective: We conducted a descriptive study to evaluate CRC risk using APCS in two different villages. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study involving 925 and 207 subjects in 2019 and 2020, respectively. The APCS survey in 2019 was done before the COVID-19 pandemic with paper-based questionnaires and direct assessment by door-to-door approach. Meanwhile, the APCS survey in 2020 was done during the COVID-19 pandemic using websites and mobile apps available for Android and iOS. We gathered participants’ characteristics and the APCS score in both groups and tabulated them. Results: In 2019, out of 925 subjects; 472 (51%) have been classified an average risk of CRC, 370 (40%) have been classified as having a moderate risk of CRC, and 83 (9%) have been classified as in high risk of CRC. In 2020, out of 207 subjects; 106 (51.2%) have been classified as the average risk of CRC, 86 (41.5%) have been classified as the moderate risk of CRC, and 15 (7.3%) have been classified as high risk of CRC. Conclusion: Although there was a decrease in the participation of the screening program with mobile applications in the pandemic era compared with paper-based questionnaires before the pandemic era, online screening using APCS in mobile applications is a preferred alternative for an effective screening method in this pandemic and possibly in the future in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Promkes The Indonesian Journal of Health Promotion and Health Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Promkes The Indonesian Journal of Health Promotion and Health Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/jpk.v11.i1.2023.19-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Promkes The Indonesian Journal of Health Promotion and Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jpk.v11.i1.2023.19-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近十年来,亚洲结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率持续上升。早期发现可降低结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率;然而,在印度尼西亚等发展中国家,用结肠镜检查、CT扫描或MRI等成像方式进行大规模结直肠癌筛查是不可行的。亚太结直肠癌筛查(APCS)用于对个体结直肠癌风险进行分层。通过移动应用程序进行在线筛查是确保社区筛查连续性而不存在新冠病毒传播风险的另一种方法。目的:我们进行了一项描述性研究,以评估两个不同村庄使用APCS的结直肠癌风险。方法:采用横断面研究,2019年和2020年分别纳入925名和207名受试者。2019年APCS调查是在COVID-19大流行之前进行的,采用纸质问卷和上门直接评估的方式。与此同时,APCS在2020年的调查是在COVID-19大流行期间使用Android和iOS可用的网站和移动应用程序完成的。我们收集了两组参与者的特征和APCS评分,并将其制成表格。结果:2019年,925名受试者中;472例(51%)被归为中度风险,370例(40%)被归为中度风险,83例(9%)被归为高危。2020年,在207个科目中;平均风险106例(51.2%),中度风险86例(41.5%),高危15例(7.3%)。结论:尽管在大流行时期,与之前的纸质问卷相比,使用移动应用程序进行筛查的人数有所减少,但在本次大流行期间,在移动应用程序中使用APCS进行在线筛查是一种首选的有效筛查方法,未来可能在印度尼西亚也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paper-Based versus Mobile Apps for Colorectal Cancer Screening in COVID-19 Pandemic Setting
Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Asia has kept increasing in the last decade. The morbidity and mortality for CRC can be reduced with early detection; however, mass CRC screening with imaging modalities such as colonoscopy, CT scan, or MRI is unfeasible in developing countries such as Indonesia. Asia Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) is utilized to stratify individual CRC risk. Online screening via mobile application is an alternative method to ensure the continuity of community screening without risking COVID-19 transmission. Objective: We conducted a descriptive study to evaluate CRC risk using APCS in two different villages. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study involving 925 and 207 subjects in 2019 and 2020, respectively. The APCS survey in 2019 was done before the COVID-19 pandemic with paper-based questionnaires and direct assessment by door-to-door approach. Meanwhile, the APCS survey in 2020 was done during the COVID-19 pandemic using websites and mobile apps available for Android and iOS. We gathered participants’ characteristics and the APCS score in both groups and tabulated them. Results: In 2019, out of 925 subjects; 472 (51%) have been classified an average risk of CRC, 370 (40%) have been classified as having a moderate risk of CRC, and 83 (9%) have been classified as in high risk of CRC. In 2020, out of 207 subjects; 106 (51.2%) have been classified as the average risk of CRC, 86 (41.5%) have been classified as the moderate risk of CRC, and 15 (7.3%) have been classified as high risk of CRC. Conclusion: Although there was a decrease in the participation of the screening program with mobile applications in the pandemic era compared with paper-based questionnaires before the pandemic era, online screening using APCS in mobile applications is a preferred alternative for an effective screening method in this pandemic and possibly in the future in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信